[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


What was kubrick trying to say with this and why did warner bros cut some scenes?
>>
>>215531997
In the original ending the couple sells their daughter to the elites and she's abducted at the mall. This is still technically true of the theatrical ending, it's just obscured in the background to the extent most viewers never register that's what's going on.
>>
>>215531997
I hate this pic because the message is essentially against age-gap dating/sex
>ugh, those rich geriatrics who paid for sex from young women are so evil (never elaborates why though)
Kubrick's advances must've been rejected by a some younger lass and he made it out of spite, the fat fuck. This movie has ruined an entire generation of younger women.
>>
.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.