>imdb: 7.5Ok, what am I missing? It's boring and predictable. I literally fell asleep watching it, and this basically never happens. Does one need to be 70 to enjoy it? I watched it for Nielsen btw.
>>215533005>7.5? what am I missing!IDK OP, a movie this good should have->It WuZ b0rInG aN pReDikTaBl!retard
its good but also robbie is iconic and shaped culture as we know it today
>>215533005
I mean, the set design is insane, for one.
>>215533366
It's basically a Star Trek episode that came out a decade before that show premiered. It's fun.
The blonde had great legs and waist. That's all I remember
>>215533005It was out of the 50s, you stupid fuck.No one at the time could have conceived a person of your lameness.Now go fuck yourself in the ass with your funkopop.
>>215533392>>215533366the sets are all iconic, the UFO landing especially. shot composition is beautifulsound design was way, way ahead of its time. fully electronic before synthesizers were inventedthere is a lot of schlocky old school sci-fi charm that is emblematic of the time. It's the very last, and the greatest, pre-Star Trek pulp sci-fi.Forbidden Planet has a few themes and film techniques that didn't age well, but many that did. It remains a very important artifact of sci-fi history.
>>215533005filtered
>>215533005Stick with capeslop, plebian.
>>215533523People in the 50's collected index cards and beige paint samples for fun.
>>215535429Sounds more fun than the crap Hollywood puts out these days
90% of people who complain about how predictable a good movie was cannot actually properly describe what happened.
>>215535461I hope he's ok
>>215533005For me it's the old school Disney animators doing the heavy lifting with the ending.
>>215533005It's a Shakespeare adaptation, which gave it credit in the eyes of movie critics.
>>215533425It even has comic relief elements like Star Trek. Such as the scene where Earl Holliman asks Robbie the robot to manufacture whiskey for him.
