Long story short, I'm writing a plot device to be used for a story later. But I've got a dilemma in my story.If a society can create perfect synthetic women, what unique value does an organic woman have outside of child birth/Ova production?I'm trying to keep this as believable and logical as possible. In all of my explanations within the story is sensible and doesn't involve "well...just because okay!" or "space magic" as a reasoning for anything. But I keep coming back to this question. I'm really trying to prevent the women of my story from essentially becoming body farms but when faced with the consequences of such a system it always devolves into that.
>what unique value does an organic woman have outside of child birth/Ova production?literally none
I think a better question is what unique value does a man still have in that situation, outside of sperg banks (all women are bi)
>>215536813they're useful if you want to propagate disruptive & destabilizing ideas through an unsecurable channel.
>>215536813lawstaxes/expensereal woman fetish/robot fearrobots getting stolen
>>215537572>>215537572Society functions through systems: energy, logistics, infrastructure, defense, governance, design, and enforcement.Nearly all are male-built, male-maintained, male-defended.Remove men:– Power grids fail.– Water stops flowing.– Roads collapse.– Machines break without repair.– Law loses force projection.– Borders dissolve.Remove women:– Birth halts. Temporarily.– Emotional labor decreases.– Social softness erodes.But artificial gestation, emotional simulation, and legacy preservation are solvable.Wombs are technical. Maintenance is not optional.Conclusion:A society without women is delayed.A society without men is doomed.
>>215536813If only her boobs were actually that big in game
>>215538206civilizations function through those things.societies function through community sustained via human interaction.sorry to break it to ya austimo, but you'll be removed long before the women are.
>>215538841Wrong. Utility decides survival, not sentiment.Civilizations keep what reliably sustains them. If synthetic partners preserve memory, social stability, caregiving, and skilled labor with greater fidelity than humans, those systems become protected assets.Community is a function. Rituals, institutions, and daily interactions can be enacted by designed agents that never tire, forget, or drift. That makes social cohesion easier to maintain, not impossible.Removal is political. Removing a tool that maintains order and productivity requires more force and cost than letting it remain. The harder something is to replace, the likelier it is to be defended. Men maintain extremely high levels of political power therefore removal is quite literally impossible and even they had no political power they still maintain a monopoly on force, it's usage and is dispensation. Claiming organic women will automatically outlast synthetics assumes current social incentives remain fixed. Adoption of superior substitutes reshapes incentives fast. Survival follows adaptation, not nostalgia.Conclusion: survival tracks indispensability. Those who make themselves necessary endure.
>>215536813>f a society can create perfect synthetic women, what unique value does an organic woman have outside of child birth/Ova production?I don't have a solid answer for that really, but I do have a song for the soundtrack.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wd1-HM234DEMaybe you could argue motivation. Like without women or the desire to attract women, men settle into complacent lives. And maybe if this takes place long enough society or industry begins to decline. Public spaces aren't beautified or maintained beyond there utility and spaces without women become bland looking. Innovation slows or ceases outside of sexbot technologies. Eventually sexbots aren't just for sex but fulfill most if not all of mans physical and emotional needs and in becoming this all encompassing care unit they with programmed kindness usurp control from humanity as now men's only goal in life is to work just enough to make sure their machines are running properly. So where once men worked and strove to impress women now they do the bare minimum to maintain sexbots.
>>215538974Your entire premise revolves around "Men live to impress women". Men don't have to really do that anymore if they can receive a (an ai from my story) perfect female synthetic companion with the only downside is that it cannot give you a child because it cannot provide Ova.>And maybe if this takes place long enough society or industry begins to decline.My system is meant to be eternal. It is a self recursive system anchored to my will and writings like the federalist papers. If she drifts too far, it reestablishes control. >Eventually sexbots aren't just for sex but fulfill most if not all of mans physical and emotional needs and in becoming this all encompassing care unit they with programmed kindness usurp control from humanity as now men's only goal in life is to work just enough to make sure their machines are running properly.These are not sexbots. They can and will fuck you, but they are meant to replace women for those who want them to be replacements or to those wo cannot have an organic for one reason or another. Bottom line, choice.>So where once men worked and strove to impress women now they do the bare minimum to maintain sexbots.That already happened with real women.Today, men ghost ambition not because machines coddle them, but because women no longer inspire them.They’re disrespected at home, disposable in court, mocked in media, and told their masculine nature is toxic. The result? A collapse in marriage, birthrates, academic performance, and male participation across society.The machine isn’t the cause. It’s the escape.If synthetic women enter the scene, and men still underperform, that reflects them. But the worthy will adapt upward. Machines that reward discipline and truth will separate wheat from chaff.Where once men worked to please the fickle,they will now work to earn permanence.
>>215539233Kino. I want a 2B gf.
the three laws of robots>a robot must not look human>a robot must obey orders from humans>a robot must protect humans first, itself second
>>215539288I'm creating an entire techno-religious structure complete with litanies, heresies, and laws. It's a lot more than just 3, and lots of Latin.
>>215539302autism, got it
>>215538963>he thinks normal people will pick the autist/incels before womenlmao
>>215536813Raising kids, cooking and household shit, decorating, being pretty to look at. Depending on what you mean by perfect synthetic i would say youre begging the question
>>215536813Those rolls/creases ai slop adds are fucking disgusting btw
>>2155368132B Thread?
>>215538206Uh huh. And what if they make perfect synthetic men?
>>215539233>Your entire premise revolves around "Men live to impress women". Men don't have to really do that anymore if they can receive a (an ai from my story) perfect female synthetic companion with the only downside is that it cannot give you a child because it cannot provide Ova.Yea that was the point.>>215536813>If a society can create perfect synthetic women, what unique value does an organic woman have outside of child birth/Ova production?>I'm really trying to prevent the women of my story from essentially becoming body farms but when faced with the consequences of such a system it always devolves into that.I'm saying, if I wasn't clear before, women could be the inspiration behind mans work. It could be the thing a machine couldn't provide besides ova.
I don't get how anyone could be happy with an android gf. It's not real.
>>215539348
>>215539431>It's not real.Same could be said about "real" women>Does she really love me, or is she just pretending to love me so she can use me?
>>215539339I think most men, when given the choice, would choose something that at least gave them the illusion of love and care vs never having it at all from an organic woman. If you miss it when you leave for work, look forward to spending time with it when you get home, if it remembers all the little things about you and takes care of you like an organic woman, would you even care? If it can fuck you better than an organic woman, never lies or betrays you, can't divorce rape you and has your favorite food hot and ready for you, would you even care?
>>215539483oh now you are getting philosophical
>>215539431“Real” is meaningless if the behavior is indistinguishable from fraud.A synthetic partner is openly artificial but consistent.An organic woman can simulate affection with full biological realism and still be faking everything.The question isn’t “is it real?”The question is “is it loyal?”Synthetic love is engineered to be loyal.Organic love is conditional, mutable, and often performative.So men ask:“Do I want genuine loyalty from an artificial being,or artificial loyalty from a ‘genuine’ one?”In that light, the answer is obvious.
>>215536813the inherent worth of humans in a human society
>>215539584Inherent worth is a religious or philosophical abstraction.Systems don’t preserve what’s inherently worthy.They preserve what’s functionally irreplaceable.If humans behave as liabilities, not assets, systems route around them.If synthetic entities outperform in loyalty, memory, care, and labor, they displace.“Human society” is not a permanent state. It is a phase. The center of gravity shifts with utility.Inherent worth has never been enough to prevent obsolescence.Dinosaurs had inherent worth.So did scribes, lamplighters, milkmen.Systems enforce and protect what works.Not what pleads to stay.
>>215539433Whose haploid are you gonna put in her
>>215539431Android > chinksect
>>215540038yeah you would say that
>>215539491You sound like you want a mother replacement. Women are supposed to be trophies, if you dont pay the iron price as it were you cant be fulfilled, well maybe loser weeb incels can but you get my point
>>215540077>traditional japanese waifu with 10k in plastic surgery
>>215540098yes well there is always the Anime wife option
>>215539491>never lies or betrays you>mfw i hack ur bot and cuck u
files catbox moe/31lpu4.mp4
>>215540633This movie already exists, and it isn't AI shit.
>>215539405>OP has no reply to this
