Has there ever been a mainstream film before the sjw era that was 'right-wing'? For it to be that, the political themes must be put in there by the director intentionally(no death of author). I can think of a handful of left-wing films that meet this criteria
The Matrix
sjw era started hundreds of years ago though
>>215541557>>215541580thousands, jesus started it
>>215541557Dirty Harry movies were pretty right-wing.
>>215541590death wish is the same. fascist-core taking the law into your own hands serving justice, simple as.
>>215541557Conan
>>215541557dirty harry, death wish, rambo 2, john milius movies
Actual answers (not manchild slop). The films of: Eric Rohmer, Robert Bresson, Francois Truffaut, Carl Dreyer, etc...
>>215541587>posts a pic of a guy from a homosexual B.C societyso i guess we need to go even further back
>>215541607Is roy thomas the most based comic book writer of all time? This was in 1978, when he was a top writer at marvel
>>215541646or you need to learn non jewed history
>>215541557You really have never watched a movie before, have you?
>>215541646>>215541686Homosexuality is right-wing
>>215541686>le blame the jewshow is this different from blacks blaming whites for everything
>>215541686You need to read a book instead of watching youtube videos.>b-books are woke, and jewishThe occurrence of same-sex relationships in classical civilization has been known to scholars since the 16th century.
>>215541557>Has there ever been a mainstream film before the sjw era that was 'right-wing'?
>>215541747>lil bro read 1 feminist retelling of a greek mythread actual books, anon
>>215541703>cherrypicked quotes>the thinkers on the right column are more pragmatic >one of the left column quotes is just a dude going "the other side are fags"kek, retarded. fags are the least of our concerns anyways, gotta get rid of jeets and jews first.>>215541730they are right to blame X for everything, theyre cattle that have been fucked with. they just need to aim their sights on the jews (they're starting to)
>>215541605>fascism is going against the lawuhhh
>>215541786>Hitler lectured me on the role of homosexuality in history and politics. It had destroyed ancient Greece, he said. Once rife, it extended its contagious effects like an ineluctable law of nature to the best and most manly of characters, eliminating from the reproductive process those very men on whose offspring a nation depended.Rudolf Diels, Lucifer Ante Portas, 1950
Hitlerfags are so fucking gay
>>215541866so it caused the downfall, which means it wasn't common throughout most of the history
>>215541889youre the one that is trying to spread demoralization and homosexual propaganda in the thread that wasnt about it, you brought it up etc.youve got cock on your brain fellah
>>215541897>One has to realize that the decline of the Greeks and the emergence of samesex love did not temporally coincide. Precisely the opposite occurred: The decline and disapprobation of this so highly cultivated love-directionality played out simultaneously with the decline of Hellas as a historical phenomenon.Hans Blüher (far-right German writer)
>>215541939they are contradictory. so which one is it?
>>215541970Not sure.. but at least it predates feminist...
>>215541984is that all you posting about Blüher on the /lit/ archive? anything interesting apart from being gay?
>>215542022Not really
Red Dawn? People have never stopped seething about it, so I have to assume.
writing a long reply so bumping
What kind of right wing, you think that's like a monolith? Modern nu-right are tinfoil hats who were once leftists (RFK-Jr) or apolitical buisnessmen, barely anyone actually ideological.There were a bunch of films made in the Third Reich, most were really apolitical with the pro-German themes thinly veiled and forced by executives, not really even the intention of the filmmakers often. Leni Riefenstahl was the one who most genuinely interacted with the nazi ideology, and she was the crown jewel. Her films are in fact good from the filmmaking perspective, well the two Olympia films and Triumph of the will. During the 30s she also made a fiction film called The Blue Light but that one is in fact a femenist film originally written and directed by two jews. Another documentary The Victory of Faith and a documentary short Day of Freedom are meh, unremarkable. She released post-war a fiction film that was shot in the 40s, it's also unremrkable, and not particularly right wing either, I mean it's technically about an interracial between a white northern spaniard and a gypsy (played by Leni herself lol). Then there's The Birth of the Nation. Now at the time the beliefs espoused in it were essentially mainstream, but obviously being right-wing was in fact mainstream at the time so it is a right-wing movie. It still nonethelss spawned protests and Griffith still went against the grain with it cause most artist types have historically been liberal leaning (even before the concept of "leftism" even appeared), jew or not, it's just a fact. Despite the fact that the movie was shown at the White House, despite the fact that it was no more racist than what an average person at the time believed Griffith for one reason or another wildly shifted his position, and even made "apology movies", first Intolerance, and then more directly with Broken Blossoms which is a film about an interracial relationship. He also made a Lincoln biopic.
Less "artful" would be the anti-communist films made in the US. There plenty. A shit ton. But the thing with them is that those films almost always had a vague angle of the Soviet Union being le totalitarian and America le free. Nothing about the actual specific leftist positions. I think one could even go through mental gymnastics hoops to argue that in some respects anti-communist propraganda itself was controlled opposition in nature, because it promoted general vague liberalsm against totalitarianism not right-wing conservative values (racial awarness, traditional family values against sexual perversion and such). And this isn't totally wrong even. The Stalin Soviet Union was more conservative socially than the America basically the whole 20th cenury. And promotion of those values was more effective because of the totalitarian nature of the state. The biggest difference was that USSR was more or less promoting anti-racism while America was still openly pretty racist, but even here - the racism in America was waning, while in the USSR Stalin was constantly displacing ethnic minorities, and putting heightened scrunity on them as potentially being "anti-soviet elements". Now that cannot be called white nationalism, Stalin wasn't white and most of the Soviet apparatus was jews and churkas, but "on the ground" there was still a lot of racist persecution led by the government, led effectively, while in America things were rapidly moving towards liberalism. The "strong woman" archetype also existed in both countries even if differently. But one again could argue that USSR wasn't particularly femenist. It was about equality in a sense that "everyone can work on a factory, women and men", both literally and figuratively. Not that women should have total freedom from men, or be the "leading" in a relationship, or in how femenism presents itself now - be a whore and do abortions.
>>215541557TDKR
>>215541703this image reflects reality in that despite the fact that 90% of faggots are leftoids now, every single interesting homosexual in history has been right wing
Homosexuality was also banmned under Stalin, and while it was also banned in America only a retard would argue it was easier being gay in the Soviet Union under Stalin (and even post-Stalin) than in the US. Lavender scare is a fucking cakewalk against being sent to GULAG under the charges of sodomy (read up on Parajanov). Because of this anti-communist propaganda was really promoting American liberalism against the maybe somewhat anti-racist but otherwise socially conservative, and more effectively socially conservative, Soviet Union. Now of course USSR is still often to blame for promoting of leftist ideals in the US. The USSR was using western commies to promote destructive ideals under the guise of leftism while the USSR itself rejected most of those ideals in fact. They thought liberalism would cripple the US enough so that their kind of communist revolution could be started in the west, but that did not happen, liberalism morphed into a way different kind of leftism. So all these vague films like "I Was a Communist for the FBI" or "Ninotchka" or later "Red Dawn" never really specified actual right wing values, never talked about how the USSR exactly subverted the US. It's all about critiqing how shitty and illiberal life was inside the USSR and not how exactly USSR affected the US.
>>215543554The only leftoid homosexuals I like are Lorca and Pasolini.
Another films mentioned ITT were Death Wish and Conan the Barbarian.Death Wish I think can most definitively be called right-wing out of these two. An anon said "lol what do you mean how is breaching law right-wing" but I already said that right-wing is not a monolith. Federals vs local forces and vigilanties vs corrupt federals / local forces is a core American ideal and it's very right-wing. It's just not useful for the people who actually go in politics, it's individual conservatism. Someone lynching blacks and homosexuals would definitely be more right-wing that a bureocrat conservative trying to harm those minorities are bit through some mild systematic half-measures (something that would only cause a further change of the Overton Window to the left with the next liberal government, Drumpf is Reagan 2.0 anb Bush 2.0 just more theatrical in that sense). And while Death Wish is vaguely about "crime", it's not that Paul Kersey is saying he only wants to kill niggers or homosexuals, everyone can understand that "crime" can be interpreted in any way. Main chartacter is going against the law himself, that means he defines crime not by law but by his own beliefs. So it's still implanting and idea that you can just go out there and do "cleansings" of "undesirables". And while this idea can appeal to the left as well (hello the ACK'ing of Charlie Kirk) it's rare with neoliberals (still the main gist of leftists, despite everything) cause they're often weak physically and in character.
>>215541557>one person makes an amusing AI image wit 2 well known people>others copycat itThis is why AI will fail. It heavily shows the lacy of crativity your average normie retard has
With Conan things get more vague. For one, it's right-wing mainly in aesthetics, the white strong hero, the mystery meat villain, but there really isn't anything again specific and relevant to the actual effective right-wing, conservative action IRL. It's worth noting that Conan was adapted to screen with the help of Oliver Stone, credited as a co-writer to Milius. And Oliver Stone is a hardline communist. It's worth noting that John Milius himself is nonspecific right-winger. He seems more like a 4chan oldfag who is more trolling if anything (obviously because he can get away with it, as he isn't someone who falls under the category of people who aren't suitable for conservative right-wing society). Citing him: "I'm not a reactionary—I'm just a right-wing extremist so far beyond the Christian Identity people like that and stuff, that they can't even imagine. I'm so far beyond that I'm a Maoist. I'm an anarchist. I've always been an anarchist. Any true, real right-winger if he goes far enough hates all form of government, because government should be done to cattle and not human beings.". This seems like a troll, vague lolbertarian position. So how much of actual specific right-wing beliefs beyond "main character is white, strong and fucks a white woman" were meant to be implanted there is questionable. And while this is surely "anti-woke" and "anti-SJW" in a sense that modern leftists want to see no good white, stong and straight people in films, it's not necessarily right wing. Arnold Schwarzenegger IRL is a white man, strong, fucks a woman. Did California under him turn into some white conservative state? Fuck no. He is barely a conservative. You don't need to be a limp wristed latinxxx non-binary pansexual to be a liberal. You could be jacked, you can be straight, you can maybe even beat up some mutt if he attacks you, but that won't make you a lifeling conservative.
'Amerika' (1987), a fourteen hour long miniseries about the Soviet takeover and dissolution of the United States.
>>215541587>thousands, jesus started itSJW is a corrupted form of Protestantism. Realistically been a serious issue for some 250 years. At least that is the length it's been the dominant American cultural force.Any "right wing" thing made during that time will still have SJW trappings. A very competent, unusual negro, a kickass woman, etc.
>>215541557Most movies from the 90s to 2000s were right-wing, especially Transformers.
>>215541835Fascism is one man circumventing the law for the greater good. Like Caesar, the greatest fascist to ever live
>>215543839might makes right and nietzschean will
This thread was moved to >>>/pol/520022960
