File: IMG_2662.jpg (137 KB, 1445x1160)

137 KB JPG

>>215546909
> However, Corcoran alleges that, in the years following the original film’s release and its subsequent rise in popularity, her royalty payments “became more and more sporadic and dwindled to amounts nowhere near commensurate.” The actress claims she has not received back pay since July 2024, and had only received $1816.35 up to that point, “with no explanation as to why the royalty payments ceased or where the remainder of the payments are.” Merchandise royalties are said to only total “approximately $6,408.26.”

> Corcoran claims to have confronted both Falcone and Leone about her royalty payments and that she was “brushed off, with Leone stating that Falcone handles all of the accounting matters and then with an aggressive and defensive response from Falcone saying he purportedly ‘doesn’t keep records.'”

>Additionally, while Corcoran’s death scene required her to be nude, the suit claims that the producers “never obtained Corcoran’s informed written consent” to film unclothed, as was required by the Screen Actors Guild. The suit alleges that Corcoran insisted she be allowed to wear underwear on the day of shooting, but that she still ended up performing the scene topless without written consent. It also claims that Corcoran was only provided a horizontal platform to break on between takes upon her request and that she “was wrapped in a blanket in between takes, but overtime the blanket became so saturated with fake blood that it ceased providing any warmth.”

>After filming overnight, Corcoran alleges she felt ill in the following days and that a doctor diagnosed her with cranial swelling and eardrum damage. In an allegation that ties together the suit’s claims of unpaid royalties and unregulated shooting conditions, the suit claims that the defendants have profited from merchandise depicting Corcoran’s nude body.

She was nude in Nuke Em High, was pretty hot for a lesbo scene

>>215546909
>with the agreement that she would receive 1% of the profits from the film
how common is this for actresses?
If they have a nude role, do they often get a percentage?

>>215547029
post the webm

>>215546961
>she still ended up performing the scene topless without written consent.
how does that happen? Did they rip the clothes off her before running the cameras?

>>215546961
Dumb bimbo thinks the first film is going to bring her steady money through many years, like as if its still playing in theaters.

File: vibrating.webm (4 MB, 840x708)

4 MB WEBM

>>215547057
Why would I have a webm when I have the movie?
but feel free to look up Janelle Brady + Nuke em High in the archives and you'll get rewarded

>>215546961
>approximately $6,408.26
That sounds about right for 1% of the merch profits for this shit, more than I would have expected it to be actually.

anyone that watches these films should be killed

the producers sounds like some scummy people, then again they must be really shitty if they produced junk like Terrifier

>>215547047
I don't think anyone expected Terrifier to be as big as it got. This was Art's second appearance and he didn't blow up after the first movie he was in. If it was going to be just one or two low budget films they could save money by giving actors a percentage instead of full payment.

>>215547138
Didnt the second movie make millions? It said 1% of this film and future sequels

>>215546909
>she would receive 1% of the profits from the film
>agreed in writing to provide Corcoran with a share in 1% of all net sales
They can just claim they just didn't make much of a profit with those movies.
This isn't even Hollywood accounting, it's just normal accounting stuff

>>215547217
For merchandise though, I don't think anybody is going out wearing Art t shirts, it would be chaos in capital cities

Did she ask for a different blanket

>>215547101

Bro…
https://www.fandango.com/terrifier-203558/movie-overview?date=2025-10-29

>>215546909
Well it certainly sounds like she's completely justified. Not the click bait nude title, being promised 1% of profit and not being given it.

>>215546909
What a dumb greedy bitch

>An attorney for Leone, Larry Zerner, stated: “Damien and Phil deny the claims in the complaint and will vigorously defend this lawsuit.”

>>215547283
They are trying though. He just released a low budget video game and had an installment at a Halloween live event.

>>215546961
>as was required by the Screen Actors Guild
This is why you don't run a union shop. I'd never allow a union member on set
>Corcoran insisted she be allowed to wear underwear on the day of shooting
That fucking bitch. She ruined the scene

>>215547376
She made a deal and showed faith in the product when they didn't really have reason to. There are plenty of stories of actors making these lucky deals. If she proves the deal, pay the lady.

>Thus far, she’s been paid roughly $8,300 under her 2015 deal, which notes it “shall remain in effect for a period of two years,” the lawsuit claims.
Her 2015 deal was for two years and it already expired according to the article. No one heard about this shitty franchise in 2017 so she probably got everything she earned. Clickbait thread.

File: Redditor.png (105 KB, 600x562)

105 KB PNG

>>215547445

File: 1761668294570312m (1).jpg (34 KB, 346x385)

34 KB JPG

>>215546961
Look! Her face is a scared clown

>>215546909
It's why the sequels don't have nudity
Female nudity is banned in modern cinema

Give the whore her money, her death was good. If you made a deal, stick to it, no take backs

>>215548140
You have access, on your phine, for free, anytime, to 18yo perfect girls getting gangbanged by dozen of guys and drinking piss while their rekt asshole spill cum of multiple guys in the mouth of another perfect 18yo girls. Why the fuck do you need nudity in your regular movie ?

>>215548318
Maybe that anon would prefer a milder form of titilation you porn-brained faggot?

>>215548318

Sex/nudity can benefit the story. This particular scene was shocking, directed well - by not making it torture porn: showing every step of the abduction, instead cutting to a different character, letting you forget it, before the horrifying reveal - and about the only good thing in this amateur first film. Had it been cut, no one would know who Art the Clown is today.

>>215547217
1% of PROFITS, buddy.

You go for the GROSS, not profit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHL91HQzhuc

>>215548318
Go to any art museum and you will see female nudes everywhere. Humanity has always been captivated by the nude form. Deal with it.

>Filming nude scene without consent
So she went naked in front of the whole film crew
Did the scene
Probably more then 1 take
Then years later realized she didnt agreed to it?

>>215547148
>kill people cause they watch a movie
I think youre the psycho in this, buddy

>>215546909
get jewed goy. shit like star wars isnt profitable 50 years later despite billions in profits. oops, no residuals for you.

>>215548533
Isn’t she suspended naked while upside down in the film? How does that happen without her consent?

>>215548455
Aren't these made on shoestring budgets? They've made their budgets back multiple times over already

>>215546909
So she filmed a nude scene and just thought it was for his personal collection or what? Sounds like she's just mad that the movie did better than expected and thinks she deserves more money.

>>215547083
>>215548533
This isn't like claiming rape after having drunk sex. If you're going to do a nude scene, the people making the film need to obtain written consent. If they didn't do that, they're dumb, and she's got a case. Doesn't matter that she did it anyway.

>>215546909
is this the girl from the old cringe dance video?

>>215546909
>2016 movie
>suddenly decides in 2025 after Terrifier 3 made a big bundle of cash in 2024 she was mistreated
Uh huh.

>>215548689
>>215548569
You could make a film with an actor, shoot the whole thing and release it. But if you didn't obtain a release form, signed by the actor, then you're going to run into major legal trouble. Doesn't matter if they willingly acted in the film. You can't just display video of a person without them agreeing to in via contract. The same goes for doing nude scenes.

>>215548693
but she took her clothes off, did the scene and then afterwards said they didn't have her consent?

>>215548693
Kill yourself faggot.

>>215548693
>Doesn't matter that she did it anyway.
Legally it doesnt matter but in the court of public opinion she's obviously a dipshit that's regretting what she did retroactively because the juice turned out to not be worth the squeeze. If the royalty checks kept flowing would we be hearing about this? Somehow I doubt it.

>>215548645
Oh man, you're dumb as hell.

>>215548693
>>215548768

I mean it sound exactly like claiming rape after having drunk sex. I would assume if someone is doing it of their own free will, they're consenting to it.

>>215548798
Yeah, this just sounds like gold digging. what has she done lately? Anything? Maybe why she suddenly bitching for attention.

>>215548768
Yeah, again, legal consent. Filming someone involves paperwork. How is this so hard for you guys to understand? As I posted upthread, an actor could star in your movie, do every scene, but if you didn't sign a release form, they can fuck you in court.
>>215548789
Cry, chud.
>>215548798
Does not matter. If they didn't not get written consent, she has a case. And if they didn't get written consent, they are the dipshits, not her. Even low to no budget film students know to have paperwork.
>>215548806
But you're working. Think of it like working off the clock at a business. Obviously that can lead to legal trouble if that's caught. The business can't just dismiss that by saying, "well, they willingly worked without getting paid!"

>>215547376
Youre a faggot and i hope you get taken advantage of every day of your miserable life

>>215548862
Not sure what part of nobody caring about the legal proceedings you aren't understanding. No one here is on the opposing counsel or standing to get paid for this. We're all just calling her a dumb and dishonest and noting that she's clearly grubbing for an undeserved payout after becoming disillusioned with the conseqnuences of her poor decisions, as women are notorious for doing in a great plurality of social and legal spheres.

>>215548862
we get the who legal thing.
we just aren't impressed because in reality she did something of her own will, was fine with everything, then ten years or so later is claiming she was victimized because someone didn't fill out a form.

I mean if you chose to work off the clock and then afterwards, complained that you worked off the clock, everyone is going to ask if you're retarded or goldigging because you're the one the victimized yourself and is now jumping on a technicality

>>215547101
>sign contract promising some of backend
>fail to follow through
makes me want to look up some early life

>>215548318
a nipple here, an ass cheek there is far more titillating than vulgar nonsense

>>215548976
Id call you a dumb slut too if you made a deal for 1% of a million dollars and all you got was $3.50

>>215547047
Well according to Hollywood accounting the lotr movies didn't make a profit. Tolkiens kid was supposed to receive a percentage of the profits but the studio told him the movies didn't make any money

>>215547101
Syndication and royalties are big part of the payment in the long run.
People who wrote King of the Hill still make thousands a month just from re-runs and syndication.
>>215548743
This, and addition to that - sometimes there might be pressure from the film crew, the director or so to do the nude scene or whatever without signing it - even if you dont want it, since you might be the person who gonna cost hours and thousands of dollars to the production.

>>215546961
>only received $1816.35 up to that point
>Merchandise royalties are said to only total “approximately $6,408.26.
This should be the takeaway for anons itt. This is scarily accurate and hyper common in the industry. People earn chicken feed for a lot of the movies posted about here. It remains one of the greatest illusions of modern culture. I know several actors who've never made > $20k for sizable roles. And if you luck into a hit, "Hollywood math" prevails, powerful lawyers will bleed you out before any trials and ruin your reputation. It's a nightmare world

>>215549185
The take away should be not to get naked in front of a camera for 4 or very low 5 figure payouts. Or just not to get naked infront of a camera in general.

>>215547283
Are you fucking retarded? Art the Clown merch makes millions at horror cons across the world. It's literally a near phenomenon. Watch videos from any horror con in the last 6 years and see all the Art merch. That and Scream are the leaders.

>>215547101
>Oy vey this goy thinks she can get the few thousands of dollars that she was promised in this contract that we both signed. THIS IS ANUDA SHOA. I'M BEING HOLOCAUSTED.

>>215546961
>a doctor diagnosed her with cranial swelling and eardrum damage
This happened because she was naked for a few hours? Do nudists know about this?

>>215549232

I think anon was just making a dumb post to reuse the “capital city” meme from when Terrifier first went viral here.

>>215549563

Upside down, dipshit

>>215548689
>Sounds like she's just mad that the movie did better than expected and thinks she deserves more money.
She's mad that this trash franchise blew up and made $100 million after her contract for 1% of profit expired in 2017.

>why am I not being paid for this direct-to-streaming horror schlock
Hmm

>>215547246
Maybe if they hadn’t gloated about how profitable it’s been as part of the marketing

>why am I being sued for ripping off my actors and now following the law

Hmm

>>215547101
How does that boot leather taste?

>>215546909

> :O wow

>>215548318
Nudity and horror go hand in hand. Exploitation is the entire point of the genre.

>>215546961
Without looking into this any further, sounds like she's going to profit handsomely.

>>215549794

Most people only know the movie because of that scene. She kinda deserves a nice slice of the pie.

>>215550115
Absolutely. Hope she's got the paperwork, but if she didn't, I doubt she would file suit. The jewish producers trying to scam her deserve to get fucked over.

>>215548318
>you can go online and watch real beheadings for free, why do you need violence in your movie?

File: 1759538820935056.jpg (1 KB, 60x60)

1 KB JPG

>>215546909
Uh? You cant see her pussy at all, case dismised! Next!

>>215547057
this

>>215546909
This whore needs to be disciplined

>>215546909

>>215548318
why does every thread have a numbnut asking this.
>why do you like to see things in a movie that you like to see?

>>215546909
Take those fucking yids to the cleaners

>>215546909
>hung upside down by her ankles for “over 10 hours in below freezing temperatures.”
She would have died from blood rushing to the head, this is an objective lie

Kek, imagine how retarded a person must be to sign a deal for profits instead of gross, which has been a well known scam for over a century. This dumb bitch is about to get pwned by an army of jewish accountants

>>215546909
>1% of all net sales
She literally fell for the Gross vs Net swindle. What an idiot.

>>215550828
>To mitigate the pooling of blood in her head while suspended by her ankles, Corcoran shot the scene in 40-second increments across ten hours, with a platform placed underneath her at some points so she laid horizontally.
> It also claims that Corcoran was only provided a horizontal platform to break on between takes upon her request and that she “was wrapped in a blanket in between takes, but overtime the blanket became so saturated with fake blood that it ceased providing any warmth.”

Anyone else remember that when Terrifier 2 was being made, there were rumors on here and le reddit about an upcoming indie release where the director was jerking it behind the camera?

yep, it was this director

>>215547101
It doesn't sound like she's the stupid one in the story.

I enjoyed part 2 but my god the acting is so bad and the length was too long. The movie also has a gross cartoon feel, which I don't like. Martyrs is gross for the torture aspect, this feels gross cos the director is a perv like Victor Salva.

File: IMG_2611.jpg (48 KB, 730x730)

48 KB JPG

>>215551054

Wait what?

Why does every post itt taking the foid's side sound a little ESL? Really makes you think

>>215546961
I hate how american litigiousness means people routinely have to make shit up like they got a brain bleed from being upside down for a bit, or they have "trauma and nightmares" after slipping on a stoop or some dumb shit like that.
The money thing is fair, you get shafted by the most jewy business in the world and you want your cut, ok. But you gotta bolster those tort claims, so now you're "forced" to appear in the nude and you got a brain bleed and eardrum damage. What a gay country.

>>215546909
>who farted?!

>>215551193
>what a gay country where they actually have laws
go back to south africa faggot lmao

File: soyjak-spinning-spinning-(...).gif (13 KB, 220x133)

13 KB GIF

>>215551110
>Actress reaches a deal for one percent of all profits across the franchise
>Hollywood accounting
>It doesn't sound like she's the stupid one in the story.

>>215548318
>you can watch standup any time you want, why do you need comedy in your regular movie?

>>215548976
Yeah, but I think what she's doing is not only logical, it's something any actor, male or female would do, in her case. Obviously she didn't star in the movie thinking that it would a breakout hit. But that's what happened. It makes sense that she wants to be paid, and if this rinky dink production didn't have the right paperwork, when they have actors getting nude onscreen, it's on them. You really need to know what you're doing in this case.
>>215548977
>she did something of her own will, was fine with everything, then ten years or so later is claiming she was victimized because someone didn't fill out a form.
You see that as hair splitting over a technicality, I see it as a pretty big oversight on the filmmaker's part. Again, this is all assuming her claim is true. Of course, had Terrifier not become a smash hit, she wouldn't have phoned. But since it did, they really should have looked into that. My guess is that the crew behind Terrifier are bunch of dumb goofs who thought they could throw money at a legal team to keep it all at bay. But who knows.
>I mean if you chose to work off the clock and then afterwards, complained that you worked off the clock, everyone is going to ask if you're retarded or goldigging because you're the one the victimized yourself and is now jumping on a technicality
Yes, but in part it's also on the business to make sure that's not happening. Matter of degree. When you have an actress showing her goods in your movie, you want to make sure you have all your ducks in a row. Hard to not see this all as a blunder on the filmmaker's part.

>The lawsuit names production banners Dark Age Cinema and Fuzz on the Lens Productions as defendants, in addition to producer Phil Falcone and Leone and the filmmaker’s banner Art the Clown.
The author should be fired for poor writing. This made me think the actor playing Art got sued too, and I read the whole story to see what he did but nothing came up. Turns out she’s suing the trademark. They could’ve explained that a lot better.

>>215548318
Where did this type of argument form? I see it thrown around at video games a lot, and now some faggot is using it to talk about movies?

>>215550332
I can watch a boxing or MMA match with my dad. What about you anon, can you watch porn with your dad ? I don t need nudity in my movie, it s cringe.

File: 1757275552053958.jpg (201 KB, 1000x668)

201 KB JPG

>>215551354
>I can watch a boxing or MMA match with my dad. What about you anon, can you watch porn with your dad ? I don t need nudity in my movie, it s cringe.
So obvious, every time

>>215551251
if you actually had law there would be laws to curtail this kind of behavior, but that would lower the income of jewish lawyers so it will never happen since your fake country is a scam designed to maximize jewish profit. continue bleeding, piggy

>>215547377
>Larry Zerner
This is Shelly from F13 Part III, BTW.

>>215551430
>how dare they just let people go around rightly suing people who break the law don't they see all they're doing is HELPING DA JOOS

these zogbots are really weak lmao

>>215551502
What's funny is that they're laughing at the actress for falling for Jewish accounting tricks - gross vs net. Their bias couldn't be more apparent.

>>215546909
>distribution of sexually explicit materials without consent
wtf

>>215547246
>They can just claim they just didn't make much of a profit with those movies.
>This isn't even Hollywood accounting, it's just normal accounting stuff


They could but it would be bad publicity. They did a whole marketing campaign about how successful the movie was. So to claim it didn't make money would just be a bad move.

Whats most likely going to happen is the producers are going to offer her a settlement to make get go away. Cut her a check for $10 million or something.

That way she doesn't take it to court and the Hollywood accounting nonsense they used won't be exposed.

>>215551776
Just further proof to me that Leone is semitic trash

>>215548318
You're a zoomer and your brain is fried from watching so much fuckin porn on your phone. I didn't grow up that way so seeing a bit of nudity does not offfend me the way it offends you.

>>215551957
So this dumb bimbo actress is... doing what makes total sense? Stupid bitch.

>>215551346
Probably people who have no kinks or preferences. Also could just be one of those generic responses that women love to use.

>>215551187
>capitalizing esl
GOOD MORNING SAAR

>>215552587
Yes, we capitalize acronyms. Don't accuse someone of else of being an Indian when you don't know writing rules

>>215546909
>Corcoran is best known to “Terrifier” viewers as the centerpiece of one of the original 2016 slasher’s most memorably demented sequences, in which the actress’ character is hung upside down, topless, and slaughtered by the villain Art the Clown.
Wow I didn't realise there was a film about the Angolan War of Independence.

Tl;dr? How do you film a nude scene without consent

She showed her goods. Pay her up, chuds!

>>215546909
How long before all women roles are played by men again?

>>215553197
Don’t need to, just use Ai

>>215553239
Two more weeks right faggot lmao

>>215548318
You wouldn't get it.

>>215551187
Because it's the same faggot simp shitting up the entire thread

>>215549704
>I'll use the law to get what I want.
>fuck you bootlicker!

>>215549185
No fucking way the terrifier creator is making little money from the merch and other shit to justify paying her so tiny. He's a Jew too funnily enough. Shame for the art actor. He does a good job acting even if I don't like the movies.

>>215548798
You might think it's bullshit because it is, but that's the bullshit you have to deal with making a film. The paperwork is more to protect the production from shit like this.

They fucked up and will end up paying for it.

>After the sequel premiered in 2022, Corcoran says she began receiving intermittent royalty payments. Thus far, she’s been paid roughly $8,300 under her 2015 deal, which notes it “shall remain in effect for a period of two years,” the lawsuit claims. When she confronted director Damien Leone and producer Phil Falcone, Corcoran was allegedly “brushed off” and was told that the production “doesn’t keep records.”

Hmm for a period of 2 years. The Jew director probably did Jew her out of some money but it wasn't anything massive like what terrifier would later come to gain.

File: 1759773867606845.png (273 KB, 533x358)

273 KB PNG

Whore smells money
More news at 11

i have less respect for fags who watch this tripe called "horror"
gore fags utterly disgust me

>>215551187
It's not that she's really wrong here, legally speaking. She has every right to sue them for that. But her behavior is just a regular woman thing. Decides to get naked, then finds out years later that she can cash in on that by claiming she never wanted to. I seriously doubt she had the mental capacity to get naked so that she can sue them later. At the very least I could respect that somewhat.

>>215555090
>I seriously doubt that she had the mental capacity to get naked so that she can sue them later

I have legitimately heard of women actresses and other types of occupations doing things like that so they can get a big payday later. Suffer a bit now to win big later. Even a few men are capable of doing this too. That's why some production companies are so cagey about their practices so they don't have to go through this ever.

>>215546909
FUCK THOSE KIKES. TAKE ALL THEIR MONEY

>>215555090
She's clearly using a legal loophole to get paid, but end of the day he is ripping her off. If he honored the agreed up on deal, this probably wouldn't happen.

Some guys just can't help but try to screw people over. Look at McMahon, If he just paid the girl the agreed up on sum, it never would have happened. Men out there losing dollars by trying to steal pennies.

>>215547047
>If they have a nude role, do they often get a percentage?
Nobody would have expected Terrifier to ever go anywhere. It was made for peanuts, basically a glorified student film. The director even had to launch an Indiegogo to fund the sequel years later. T2 and T3 then made over $100 million combined at the box-office.

>>215547148
The director is Italian, they are sick people. Just look at Salo by Pasolini.

>>215551122
If you think that acting was bad, watch all hallows eve. As far as terrifier 2, the young boy easily had some of the worst acting I've ever seen in a theater

>>215547246
>They can just claim they just didn't make much of a profit with those movies.
T3 made over $90 million at the box-office on a production budget of $2 million. How are you going to pretend you didn't make money? They spent $100 million on marketing? The movie has probably made double that by now from streaming, VOD, Blu-Ray sales, etc.

>>215550379
What is this, a Captain for ants?

>>215548455
>You go for the GROSS, not profit.
These movies have been undeniably profitable. It's like pretending Demon Slayer Infinity Castle didn't make profit somehow.

More blue tape, no wonder nobody wants to film in America. Donald!

>>215555433
Where the fuck they find that kid. kek

>>215547138
Nah, they're selling tshirts in the mall now. They've got licensed Halloween costumes, tsotchky trash of all kinds too. They're definitely making money hand over fist off merch. If (IF!) this woman is actually entitled to one percent of all that dosh, she'll get a fucking ton and the filmmakers signed a shitty deal. It's happened before, like how Kenner had exclusive toy rights to Star Wars which pretty much fucked George Lucas for years. Filmmakers sign shitty deals all the time when they don't realize that they've got a hit on their hands. Or maybe she's going home with squat, again I don't know if her case has legs.

>>215556343
I assume it's filed in California and she'll have SAG on her side. It has legs.

Most likely they'll do a settlement. These hollywood moneymen have been screwing people for years, I'm not going to cry over someone screwing them back once in awhile.

>>215546909
>>215546961
>1% of the profits from the film, as well as potential future franchise entries and related merchandise, including other licenses of the intellectual property.

That's why you sign up for 1% of the earnings, not profits, otherwise Jew accounting will turn every single one of those items "unprofitable".

>>215548862
>legal consent
This isn't the issue. She is saying they didn't have written consent for nudity as required by her union.

>>215549059
The author of Forest Gump also agreed to getting paid in profits. The movie apparently never was profitable until his death.

sounds like studio accounting. it happens a lot. they will claim the movie never makes a profit to avoid paying people when they can get away with it. same shit happened with mean girls.

>>215556638
So she's a scab then?
Fuckin' bitch.

>>215548318
>why do you want onions sauce on your fried rice? Just drink a bottle of it.
It's amazing these people can even operate a phone.

>>215546909
you see that dirty slut in return to nukem high 2 goddamn she'll do anything for relevancy and a chance to get paid doing horror conventions

might as well have kept the bra on, those arent even handfuls of titmeat

>>215547029
that movie is like from 85 the fuck you talking

>>215548318
It's not your fault you're like this. The infinite internet and porn access did this to you. You've separated your sex drive into a separate entity meant to be routinely handled as if it's nothing but a hassle that gets in the way of your life. You never learned to live with it and enjoy it. You guys never stood a chance though. They removed all the healthier erotic sexuality from tv and movies and left you with nothing but hardcore porn. Of course it fucked you up.

>>215546909
SUE THEM

>>215556638
What you described is legal consent.

>>215547376
Pay up, Rabbi