Stuckman bros... Why is everyone turning against him and his SHELBY OAKS kino?
>>215548519Critics should never make the type of art they criticize
>>215548519Movie critics should never make movies and movie makers should never critique movies. It’s the only intelligent choice.
We have to save him bros
>director who spend years
>>215548519It's called jelaousy, his flick is a financial success meaning he will get more chances to make more movies, and has room for improvement.
Didn't Drinker do this too?
>>215548519Who gives a fuck OP's Redditor Sockpuppet Account #25653467 whining about him, I wanna see if the other Film and Grifter Youtubers review his film and if they praise it or roast it
>>215548519You just KNOW that Mike Stoklasa wrote that desu.
>>215548519Never liked his content and have no desire to support his work
>>215548519>rat teethhe's jewish
>>215548777That REDDIT summary would also describe Mike Stoklasa thoughbeit desu senpai.
>>215548995Stuckmann actually made a movie that feels like a movie and that even got a theatrical release. A mediocre horror flick has ten times more artistic integrity than fucking Space Cop.
What sort of person posts here?
>>215548565>>215548528worked for Godard
>>215549074well the entire French New WavePaul Schrader was also a film critic Peter Bogdanovich
>>215549053>My e-celeb grifter is totally better than your e-celeb grifter!!!This is just sad.
>>215548995No? Mike hasn't really tried to make his real film yet, Spacecop doesn't actually count since it was just a shitpost basicaly.Im sure when he finaly does it's gonna blow Stuckman's dogshit out of the water.>>215549053No, wrong. Stop.
>>215549053Wow, a movie with a six figure budget that hired actual Hollywood professionals to film it looks more like a movie than a no-budget movie 3 guys slapped together using their youtube cameras.How did Stuckman do it?
>>215549115I don't care about Stuckmann's YouTube content but I do enjoy seeing RLM suffer cause they're one of the biggest faggots on the platform, like top 5. Some random guy with iMDB Top 250 tier grasp on cinema getting to make a financially successful indie flick over those pretentious hacks is irony one can appreciate.
>>215549117Space Cop was a movie based on the kind of movies Mike typically criticizes and it has the exact same problems. Mike has also been afraid to criticize Hollywood slop ever since he started getting celebrity guests and cameo voice roles.
>>215549198They had a celebrity guests already in the first year of HITB.
>>215549223The guy who directed "The people vs George Lucas?" Some celebrity!
>>215549259They had Tim Heidecker on their show.
Name a bigger Chad in filmmaking today.
>>215548519chris is based
>>215549300Get real
>>215549061here's your top posts of all time brah
>>215550152>same redditor has the top two postsHmmmmm
>>215548519>>215549430>>215549980god he looks like a faglord spasticpost that one clip wheres hes just going down a main street
>>215550076More people heard of Tim Heidecker than Jack Quaid.
>>215550246And can’t even walk in a straight line
>>215550152Everyone on Reddit seems deranged and insecure...
>>215550726so just like this place
>>215548727To be fair to him, one of the main criticisms of Hollywierd that Drinker makes is "they don't make enough For The Dads shlocky airport novel action thrillers anymore" and that's what he made. It's not a great film, and his books aren't great books, but they aren't trying to be highbrow and his criticism certainly isn't.
>>215549074>>215549114It only worked because the New Wave was a circlejerk of a tiny community of critics praising each other's films incessantly.
>>215549118The Blair Witch was made by a couple dickheads walking around in the woods with Party City costumes.
>>215548528Agreed.They need to attempt it early in their career, fail, and then become and stay criticsNothing stinker than desperation of trying to climb back into the medium they criticize.
>>215551018Exception proves the ruleThanks anon
>>215548528> Francois Trufault> Anthony Asquith> Paul Schrader> Peter Bogdanovich> Jean Luc Godard
>>215548727Strangely, Mauler, who loves to slag off Stuckmannized, has said nothing about Drinker's cinematic abortion.
>>215548519Because he was a fraud then and he's a fraud nowHe offered weak, superficial critique often plagiariazed from other sources, and as a fimmaker is known for unintentionally hilarious shorts resulting in him having to literally buy his way into the director's chair because no-one would back him based on actual talent
>haha im not gonna do anymore negative reviews so surely all my former peers will do the same and not post any negative reviews of my movie!>25% from top critics
>>215548727Yes he literally puts a strong female character who is able to somehow overpower a dude 3 times her size in his "film" and all his cronies praised his amazing movie.
>>215550198He’s jewish
>>215548519I don't think it matters, one can be a good reviewer and a bad director, don't know who this guy is though >>215548727Yes though his was a proof of concept either way he actually made something
>>215551651>Yes though his was a proof of concept either way he actually made somethingSo altright chuds like participation trophies now?
>>215551576Why did they betray him Stuckbros?!
>>215551896He didnt make it full effort so of course it's subpar, Critical Chad is still the best youtube reviewer
>>215549061People to scared to post on /tv/ because of the racism and transphobia.
>>215548519Saw it yesterday, enjoyed it. But seeing that the writer/director likes Cowboy Bebop now don't like it. Worst movie I've seen all year
>>215552178im happy RLM decided to finally post rich evan's 10 million dollar bail so he could be in the latest episode
>>215548519I want his shirt.
>>215551576Unlike Mauler he was upfront about it and made it clear what he was doing.
>>215552178How old is Rich?
>>215549198>Space Cop was a movie based on the kind of movies Mike typically criticizesno, it was a movie on based on the kind of movies Mike says he ultimately enjoyed because they were schlock
RLM are cowards if they don't review it.
>>215550783Not particularly, no.
