/tv/ i heard you wanted more interracial sex scenes, obsese black women yapping and mutts being the leads in your star trek so i made this for youenjoy!
>>215550305is that a boy... or a girl?goddamn it.
>>215550305How the hell did we get to the point of there being like 8 Star Trek shows and most people being unaware of all of them?!
>>215550374They're behind a paywall. Do you know the full show listings of services you don't pay for? I have no idea what's running on Netflix or Apple+ right now.
>>215550305I won't even watch the trailer. They don't want me as an audience. They don't want the most watered-down version of me imaginable as an audience. If you are not welcome, leave. Star Trek has died after VOY. Refusing to accept this reflects bad on a person.
sorry forgot the trailer linkhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnHc8cLLGAMplease let me know how much it reminds you of star trek in comments
>>215550305I thought it was going to be Harry Potter in space, not 90210.
Paul Kinomatti
>>215550305
>>215550685Star Trek is woke. Always was, always will be.
>>215550347>is that a boy... or a girl?No
>>215550474What's wrong with ENT?
>>215550685Military Socialism attracts both liberals and conservatives
>>215551114Not a lot, as far as writing and acting is concerned. But it was the first show that did not progress in the Star Trek timeline. Until ENT, every show advanced the timeline. ENT was a step back, it was kind of a prequel, and it rubbed me wrong.
>>215550305>i heard you wanted more interracial sex scenesyes please
>>215550305>be mutt trek>pioneer in interracial relationship decades ago>show is essentially noahide law in space>trek pedos still insist these newer developments are somehow out of character
>>215550684someone should make a collage of these
>>215550618>Mfw I realize I'm in a Star Trek show
>>215550432thats the double-edged sword, i bet. You used to be able to see what a lot of services had to offer, and you could browse them for "ideas" of what to pirate. curb that feature and now no one knows what you have except what you pump advertising bucks into.
>>215550305leftists consider paramount the chud network btw.
>>215551644Its honestly not a bad service outside of Star Trek, I watch it maybe the most. I have very boomer tastes though. I am about to drop Tulsa King though its just gotten way too stupid.
>>215551114>What's wrong with ENT?nta but it has that network porno aesthetic that was prevalent in the 2000s. Seems too smutty for star trek.
>>215550305>>215550684why is it so fucking orange
>>215551675You didn't realize it was stupid when Stallone was literally having people switch sides in a mob war mid-conversation?
>>215551644I thought it was Apple
