[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1738341499829084.jpg (1.17 MB, 2028x2048)
1.17 MB
1.17 MB JPG
Should Ridley Scott make a sequel to Legend?
>>
>>215551682
god I hope not, Ridley Scott has become a washed up hack
>>
I'd rather just remake the first one to not suck
>>
>>215551682
He should've retired and left society after Alien.
>>
>>215551682
sadly wouldn't be the same without tim curry
>>
>>215551682
Personally the idea of these direct numbered sequels to classic movies is slightly off putting to me. If it wasn't planned as a multi-part story, I wouldn't make a sequel and call it "[movie title] 2"
But a spiritual successor? Something similar, in the same spirit, even using the same characters or being tied to the story, in the way Prometheus relates to Alien?
That I'm ok with.

So yea sure, I'd watch a sequel to Legend
Just please don't call it "Legend 2"
>>
>>215551682
It's called Zelda and they're already making it.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.