/tv/ - Did the past have better actors? - Television & Film

Anonymous

10/28/25(Tue)18:01:01 No.215553365

Anonymous 10/28/25(Tue)18:01:01 No.215553365 Archived

Did the past have better actors?

Anonymous
10/28/25(Tue)19:10:38 No.215554581

Anonymous 10/28/25(Tue)19:10:38 No.215554581

>>215553365
Yes

Anonymous
10/28/25(Tue)19:16:30 No.215554686

Anonymous 10/28/25(Tue)19:16:30 No.215554686

No

Anonymous
10/28/25(Tue)19:17:04 No.215554695

Anonymous 10/28/25(Tue)19:17:04 No.215554695

Maybe.

Anonymous
10/28/25(Tue)19:55:17 No.215555384

Anonymous 10/28/25(Tue)19:55:17 No.215555384

I don't know.

Anonymous
10/28/25(Tue)19:55:42 No.215555395

Anonymous 10/28/25(Tue)19:55:42 No.215555395

File: 1758670822722771.jpg (324 KB, 528x558)

>>215553365
>Chef... some customers just walked in... and get this... they are going to want to order items from our menu...

Anonymous
10/28/25(Tue)19:56:37 No.215555413

Anonymous 10/28/25(Tue)19:56:37 No.215555413

>>215553365

Anonymous
10/28/25(Tue)20:02:09 No.215555517

Anonymous 10/28/25(Tue)20:02:09 No.215555517

>>215555384
>CAN YOU REPEAT THE QUESTION?!?

Anonymous
10/28/25(Tue)21:20:24 No.215556861

Anonymous 10/28/25(Tue)21:20:24 No.215556861

>>215555395
>I need more fucking Oompa Loompa hands!

Anonymous
10/28/25(Tue)21:20:56 No.215556869

Anonymous 10/28/25(Tue)21:20:56 No.215556869

>>215553365
No, but it had better writers

Anonymous
10/28/25(Tue)21:21:23 No.215556879

Anonymous 10/28/25(Tue)21:21:23 No.215556879

>>215553365
There are 0 good actors under the age of 40 now, so yes