Is /tv/ going to check out Rachel Sennott’s new show? Will it top Girls?
>>215556232Does Sennott really have that much pull where you advertise things “from Rachel Sennott”?
>>215556232I refuse to believe this bitch isn't a member of the tribe.
>>215556232JFC… they gave this hideously repulsive, no-talent cunt her own show???First Bella Ramsey, now this ugly troll getting her own show… I don’t see how Hollywood could sink any deeper into the pool of shit it’s created for itself.
>>215556232Are they really trying to market this as the next Girls?
>>215556232>jew shit>2025Hell no
Is Girls worth hate-watching?
>>215557057I remember watching Girls when I was 20-something, I wasn't redpilled yet and recognized myself in some of the situations. But it did expose to me the shallowness of some girls and I could find some resemblance with the girls I crossed path with in Paris, France.>t.frog