>But Cosmic Book News said he would be replaced Apologize to Mr Gunn for ever doubting him
>>215580689If Gunn was replaced, would the autitic snyderfags hate the new guy as much as they do Gunn? Will they ever let it go?
>>215580722Probably if they don’t bring back their blading gay obsession Cavill
>>215580722Unless it was Joss Whedon or Taika Watiti replacing him, no. Those three are the unholy trinity of cinema and are the antithesis of what DC on film should be.
Snyder is the Yoko Ono of superhero movies
>>215580920> antithesis of what DC on film should be.No, that would be Snyder trying to turn the entire DC Universe into The Watchmen. Funny how the most successful DC movie was the most MCU type one
After Supergirl and Lanterns bomb expect the language to change.Gunn is getting fired in 2028.
>>215581145>After Supergirl and Lanterns bomb expect the language to change.Gunn is getting fired in 2028.
>>215581145>Superman bombed with test audience it’s le over>Sueprman will bomb with critics >Ok, it’ll bomb opening weekend >It will fall off a cliff it’s second weekend >F4 will break its legs off and destroy it >There won’t be a sequel >Gunn is getting fired by Paramount>Two more weeks
>>215581106>that would be Snyder trying to turn the entire DC Universe into The WatchmenAnd that's a bad thing how exactly? Better than turning DC into a knock off MCU clone quipfest with no gravitas or stakes. God forbid someone try to elevate the genre.
>>215581393> . God forbid someone try to elevate the genre.He failed
>>215581445In your opinion. But even if I was to grant you that, I would much rather watch an ambitious DC Universe that takes itself seriously even if it falls on its face rather than a complete farcical DC Universe filled with post ironic Gen x humor.
>>215581519nta but it's superheroes. why wouldn't it be farcical? why would it be serious in the first place? it's about aliens who fly and shoot laser beams at other mean aliens.
>>215581547Because if that's the case, then whats even the point of adapting this stuff to live action? Just stick with the cartoons made for children. And I'm not even saying it all needs to be super grim dark or anything. The Raimi Spiderman movies of good examples of cbm's that are light hearted in tone, but still take themselves seriously, are sincere, and have proper stakes and gravitas.
>>215581625i agree.but i see Gunn's Superman as closer to Raimi than Snyder was. i like Burton. i like Raimi. i can even stomach Matt Reeves, because it's so clearly over the top.but Snyder? Nolan? i don't get it.
>>215581625>The Raimi Spiderman movies of good examples of cbm's that are light hearted in tone, but still take themselves seriously, are sincere, and have proper stakes and gravitas.STFU! If Riami’s Spider Man came out today, faggots like you would be trashing it.
>>215581722Gunn's stuff is just way too insincere and cynical for my tastes. Also his out of place humor and the way he self inserts himself into his stories is abhorrent.
>>215581145This. If Superman was a dissapointment than Supergirl has zero chance to succeed.
>>215581068The person everyone wrongly places blame on?
>>215581797Not at all. Because Raimi actually knew how to balance tone and when to cut the humor. Gunn could never craft something like the Thanksgiving dinner scene or the final fight with Goblin.
>>215581808>insincere>cynicalthat's interesting.at worst i always felt he wore his heart too openly on his sleeve.
>>215581968The only thing he's mildly sincere about are his daddy issues.
>>215580689Only the most delusional, vantabrown disneyshills from the smelliest, brownest pits of India ever doubted that THOUGH
>>215581968This. He got people upset over a fucking tree dying
>>215582030Look at that pencil necked jew lmfao what an awful superman.
>>215582128Cavill faggot checking in I see
>>215580722Yes, they'd hate the new guy, no they won't let it go. It's not about Gunn. The new Superman was the superior modern movie by far. They'll hate anyone who comes along because it's about something bigger. It's about the past, the promise of a future they had when they saw Man of Steel. They wanted that vague optimism and hope to keep living on through Snyder, and to take him away is to end an era. It's a way for them to reject the world as it is right now though the guise of Gunn or "woke" or whatever else they can latch on to.
>>215580722They'd hate him as long as he BTFOs the inferior flicks they were hired to shill as hard as Gunn did
>>215582200But why is it specifically jeets?
>>215582200I think you faggots are missing the part where they hired a Marvel turncoat to run DC. It's what they were trying to do in 2017 with Josstice League. That's where most of the vitriol comes from. DC fans don't want to see the brand turned into a MCU clone. I guarantee you if Chris McQuarrie, Joseph Kosinki or someone of that ilk was put in charge of DC, you would not see nearly the same level of hostility.
>>215582325You’re an idiot if you think Gunn’s DCU is anything like the MCU. You think MCU would’ve allowed a show like Peacenaker? Or a rated R Clayface movie? They only allowed Deadpool-Wolverine because Reynolds had a contract for it that carried over when they bought Fox. Notice they’re not rushing for more Deadpool movies even though it made a billion dollars
>>215582482Gee you're right, it's like the MCU except we also get TV shows where they use naughty words and there's full frontal male nudity. Oh and we get our own Morbius type low budget slop about a D list villian! DC is saved!
>>215580722>>215582200If Gunn got replaced the Snyderfags would do some victory laps but the community would peter out by the time the next guy's reboot came along. This politicization of the matter is retarded and twitterbrained. Fandom movements like this aren't fucking political parties, they don't just sit around indefintely; if they don't have momentum they die. The hatred of Gunn is personal because he ended the 2021-22 Snyderverse movement, and without him there wouldn't be a personal motivation to keep going. But I will never be proven wrong because no matter who buys WB will keep Gunn and the DCU for as long as they avoid box office disaster, which seems reasonable for the time being.
>>215582325What DC fans don't want, and never wanted, is snydershit.And all the hate against gunn, regardless fo what you hoinestly think about the movie, only exists because it put an official end to snydertard and cavillgays delusions, even if the world already moved on 10 years ago
>>215582325Nah, Warner purposefully fanned the flames and caused this gay civil war in the dc fandom by shitting on Snyder and Cavill. Gunn is Snyder's friend so he had little reason to shit on his work
>>215584280What’s funny is WB wanted to replace Cavill long before Gunn. The only reason Cavill was brought back for Black Adam is because of The Rock and the director. The Rock seriously wanted his next movie to be Black Adam beating Superman’s ass. Fact Cavill faggots are cool with this just shows they really don’t like Superman
>>215580689>No idea who buys WB yet>Gunn's DCU flops and kills the studio>But but but Gunn is still in charge post buyoutBrain dead pedos.The average capeshitter IQ must be below the freezing point
>>215584334WB didn’t shit on Snynder. If Gunn’s Superman dropped 67% it’s second weekend, there would be entirely didn’t conversion going on. If Man of Tomorrow pulls a BvS and drops 69%, Gunn won’t have a job. Yet they kept Snyder on even after that for JL disaster. He was given plenty of chances not to put something out that didn’t fall off a cliff
>>215584364Nice cope faggot. Literally spamming Gunn was going to be fired minute Paramount buys it
>>215584386They did though, they wouldn't promote his snyder cut of JL, they wanted to kick henry and replace him with a black superman and most recently there was an official ad straight up mocking MoS with the squirrel from Superman.
>>215581145two more weeks
>if the Paramount merger were to happen
>>215581393>God forbid someone try to elevate the genreIs pseudointellectual-michael bay slop really elevation?
>>215580689DC fans should want Gunn gone. You have great characters still. But Gunn isn't the man to give that to you.I'm sorry DC fans. Hollywood keeps letting you down. See you at the premiere of Avengers!
>>215580689>Peter SafranYes, he renewed with Warner.>GunnIf Safrans wants to but who knows, yes Gunn needs to focus on the biggest hitters and not in the shitters from DC, so no Creature Commandos or Peacemaker/Checkmate and to focus on Superman, Wonder Woman, Batman (and all the Batman related characters), Teen Titans, Green Lanterns (maybe) and Constantine, maybe even Arrow, Aquaman and Flash.
>>215580689If Gunn stays, it's the definitive end of DCU and DC Comics.
>>215582031Because it is the easiest thing to do, like showing puppies dying or someone elderly dying of cancer. This while blasting some sad as fuck music and showing all the characters screaming and crying.
