Our first class starts next week: 3rd november 11 AM sharp and goes on for a week. Next scheduled class will be the week thereafter starting 10th november.During a week we'll watch and discuss 9 movies picked by a representant. The first week the movies are:>Them! - 1954>Blue Thunder - 1983>Madame Web - 2024>Meet John Doe - 1941>Death and the Maiden - 1994>Yi Yi - 2000>Dreams That Money Can Buy - 1947>Oleanna - 1994>The Lobster - 2015Please watch a few to be ready for the discussion. To encourage discussion there will be a few questions for each movie but for now let yourself ponder on what these movies have in common (hint it's not political!). See you monday!
the idiots on this board don't watch movies and if they do happen to watch whatever the latest slop is they don't actually critically engage with them.
nobody is doing this why do you get to pick the movies fuck you nobody is watching 9 movies you like in a week
i would be interested in this. but i would only commit to one a week.
>>215585341I tried to pick popular movies most have seen. I'd be surprised if anyone on /tv/ hasn't watched at least one of the movies in the chart.>>215585346What 9 movies would you pick (make sure they fit the chart)?>>215585361See you monday mate!
>>215585403>What 9 movies would you picknta, but maybe a strawpoll for anons to vote on what 9 movies to watch out of a list of 200 popular films or something
>>215586060Anonymous polls are bound to fail. The old film clubs tried it and it's been done before and anons always pick Yi Yi as a memehttps://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/22608290
Bump
>>215585327Screw the wuzzies who's unhappy with the selected movies. I think you made out a solid mix. Perhaps I'd add a Tarkovsky, a Lynch and an Argento but then again maybe it would be too much for the action-focused capeshitobsessed zoomers out there.
Ok, I won't be here on monday and I spent 5 minutes trying to figure it out but I can't. Can you please tell us what these movies have in common?
Bump, cool idea.
>>215585327Cool idea. Appreciate the effort.
>>215585327That shit is definitely going to archives after 4 hours. What are you going to do, make a new thread ever time? Also you didn't mention a time zone.
I like this idea and I like the Lobster
>>215587192We'll see if it'll be any discussion. I'll try to post a thread each day the same time. Perhaps I'll post a few WEBMs from some of the movies to engage outsiders, idk.>timegood call11 AM EST, 8 AM PAC, 4 PM (1600) CET, late evening/midnight asian time
