[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images.jpg (26 KB, 495x619)
26 KB
26 KB JPG
Did anyone see this? I watched it last night with the missus. It was atmospheric and the dog was a surprisingly good "actor". It had a simplistic plot but it was short enough that it didn't overstay it's welcome. The ending was more sad than scary.
>>
Hate dogs
>>
>>215628014
People who own dogs for anything other than hunting, herding or any other job related reason are the most obnoxious people aside from cat fags.
>>
>>215628046
>>215628101
This thread isn't for you brown subhumans.
>>
File: file.png (376 KB, 720x527)
376 KB
376 KB PNG
>>215628046
>>215628101
shalom
>>
>>215628176
Brown people are retarded enough to think that dogs have the capability to love, when all they care about is shelter and food.
>>
>>215628217
>bbc
>>
>>215628014
>the dog was a surprisingly good "actor"
I imagine there was a lot of CGI on the dog's face, and perhaps a few of the full body, but I agree the dog was a good actor.
>>
>>215628046
It’s pronounced HOT dogs…
>>
>>215628237
No, brown people see dogs as something to be exploited for hunting or guarding. Dogs are the white man's best friend.
>>
>>215628240
No
>>
>>215628305
Wrong. I still imagine this, and still agree.
>>
>>215628239
Brave
Black
Canine
>>
>>215628217
So this is why muslims hate dogs - they know the dogs can sense their evil nature.
>>
>>215628339
Imagine away but with how low budget the movie was, mixed with how bad the CGI there was is, it is pretty clear what is real. The extreme zoom ups on the eyes, as well as "breaking" through the window to leave the house was all super fake. Jumping off the roof I imagine was some sort of stunt with how the landing was covered up but that would be the only questionable part.
>>
>>215628014
>OMG LE HECKIN GOODBOY PUPPERINO BOOP LE SNOOT
>>
>>215629159
>it is pretty clear what is real
Desperate claim of victory from a losing person. It is clear there is CGI on the dog's face,and at times on the body.
Prove which scenes are and arent, if you want to go further than just disagreement.
>>
>>215629198
You are brown.
>>
>>215628014
NORMIES GET OUT REEEEE
>>
>>215629358
Reread the post you replied to and you will see the scenes that are CGI is mentioned. What other parts of the movie did the dog's face look CGI to you?
>>
>>215629418
I read it. You agree with me, but want to use the vague "not so much" instead of the vague "lot of".
Or, you can go beyond simple disagreement and find something objective.
Otherwise, you are wrong, and you have already agreed with me.
>>
>>215628046
Hate non-whites
>>
>>215629457
Okay. I will allow you to move the goal post away from "lot of". For the real confusing part is more you saying you imagine there is CGI. As if there are parts you can't tell. It's pretty clear cut what is and what is not, no need to imagine. Are there other parts you believe to be CGI on the dog or just the two or three extreme eye zoom ups? You mention thinking the body is CGI as well? What scenes?
>>
>>215628014
What's the ending?
>>
>>215629628
The dog dies
>>
>>215628014
Why didn't you watch it in theater?>>215628240
You can imagine anything you want but it's a good thing your imagination isn't reality. If you had watched in theater like you're supposed to you would have seen the BTS segment and know nothing about the dog was CGI(though the second dog did have be composited in because you can't have two dogs on set and get the kind of behavior from them they wanted)
>>
>>215629159
>breaking" through the window to leave the house
Yeah, of course the window was added in post
>>215629358
>It is clear there is CGI on the dog's face
No, it isn't because there isn't. What you see on screen is the result of hundreds of days of working with this dog
>>
>Dog Looks At Shadows For An Hour: The Movie
Absolute trash movie. The ending was also terrible.
>>
>>215629628
>>215629663
No he doesn't. The owner does. The dog chases the owner's ghost down to the cellar trying to save him but can't and gets trapped, but is saved by the owner's sister.
>>
>>215628046
>>215628101

Non-white opinions are irrelevant.
>>
>>215629628
The dog lives, the owner dies and the dog is unable to save him. The whole thing was a metaphor for the cancer that was killing him. The dog could sense it, and it saw it as an evil force, but it ultimately couldn't stop it.
>>
>>215628046
>>215628101
Niggers.
>>
>>215629575
That's a lot of talking to say you cant find anything that gives, objectively, what has all the CGI your eye couldnt detect, and what scenes had none.
you already agreed with me there is a lot of CGI on the face, and some on the body.
>>
>>215630167
>the whole thing was a metaphor
Fucking hell, enough of this
>>
>>215628014
>movie about a dog
>ends sad
Well, I don’t know if you’re new to planet earth, but here on this world this is how it’s done.
>>
File: 1761361652002777.jpg (49 KB, 498x498)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
>>215628046
We hate you too nigger
>>
>>215628046
>clawed shit and litter caked paws made this post



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.