How the hell did TB (yes that's what I'm calling it because this is what it felt like) win 3 oscars and score 7.3 on imdb? Superman (2025) for example is rated 7.1 and didn't win any awards anywhere? I want my fucking weekend back.
It was 100% just fine, passable but nothing new>guy becomes obsessed with endeavour to the detriment of his family and personal lifeSeen it>poor talented people employed and abused by rich talentless peopleSeen it>muh holocaustSeen it
what are some movies where jewish people are portrayed as villains?
I 100% cannot remember what happened in the last half hour of this movie, that would be the thesis to my review of the film, and I saw it this year>>215648412you say thatl like superman deserves awards, I wasn't a brutalist fan but its a much better film than 90% of capeshits
>>215648500whatever Xmen has Magneto as villain, I bet a few James Bonds have undeniable jewish villains without saying it directly, uhm A Serious Man? Not every antagonist is a villain I suppose
>>215648500You might wanna check out some films made in Germany from 1933 - 1945.Also A Serious Man by the Coen Brothers.
>>215648477It was terrible. The characters were stupid. We saw how it was going to end an hour into this 3.5h diarrhea stream. If I wanted to experience boring meaningless slop like this, I would just do some overtime. At least I would get paid for it.>>215648530Superman didn't win any awards. TB won a shitton of awards. Superman wasn't godfather or 12 angry men, but it was way better than TB.That raises the question. You can't trust oscars! You can't trust imdb! What can you actually trust to avoid wasting your time on a propaganda movie?
what even kind of a genre was this. made-up biopic?
>>215648607You can trust me.
>>215648607no Superman a james gunn film was not better than the Brutalist. Once again I didn't even really care for the Brutalist but at least it was a film and not a low tier capeshit that is one of the weaker DC films overall. You've probably got a juvenile film mentality if you think Superman is better. You can't even call Superman a film really, its a flick.
>>215648635Jewish misery porn
>>215648412>How TB won 3 oscarsArty Farty and Jewish>Superman 2025 didnt win any awardsAs it should be. Its equally terrible with TB, but at least its not boring. Both movies are trash>>215648500Unironically the Drawn together the movie.
>>215648783> As it should be. Its equally terrible with TB, but at least its not boring. Both movies are trashHonestly I find it hard to believe. Let's try to compare these two movies.* Story and StructureSuperman plot was decent, if not mindblowing. It was definitely more coherent than TB. Pacing was great too. It was engaging too.* Direction and Cinematic VisionThe main focus of TB was architecture, and I was hoping to see some awesome architecture related stuff, and it was pretty meh at that. So I don't think it scores very well in the cinematics criteria. * Sound and MusicSuperman soundtrack was pretty good.* Overall ImpactSuperman revived what people liked about the original superman. TB gave me TB.
so glad /ourguy/ Sean Baker bodied this pseud director
>>215648905You are not wrong about TB. You go in expecting the movie to revolve around architecture, but its mostly stupid jewish drama.On gunn's superman, well, its trash. David Corenswet was not a good cast, and that autistic goody-two-shoes immigrant approach to superman was not translating well on screen. I also didnt like how colorful it looks because it feels like a discount Marvel movie, and fuck that fucking cringy ass dog. The movie could have been way better if Crypto was not included. I dont want to devolve this tread to a Gunjeet vs Snyderjeet shitposting, (not a jeet btw) so I will leave it here.
>>215648412was the most interesting movie of the year for me
>>215648905Superman was a legitimately bad movie in every noticable aspect and comparing it to TB is like comparing a grape to a graham cracker. If you can't see this what exactly are you doing here?
>>215649399Dude these are all subjective things.> David Corenswet was not a good castI thought he was good.> and that autistic goody-two-shoes immigrant approach to superman was not translating well on screen.In my opinion was a minor problem at worst. The movie focused on it for like < 5 minutes in total.>I also didnt like how colorful it looks because it feels like a discount Marvel movie,I thought it looked pretty.>and fuck that fucking cringy ass dog. The movie could have been way better if Crypto was not included.I thought crypto was cute.>>>215649821> Superman was a legitimately bad movie in every noticable aspectWhy?
>>215648500Drive.
>>215650082Kill yourself
>>215648412>boiling down a movie's merit to a numbermidwit behavior
>>215648412>Why did the zionist-pandering movie win big at the jewish-owned awards show?
>>215648412WOW JEWS !!!!!!
>>215651133Not just one number. Two numbers! (imdb and number of awards). What I want to know is, if you can't trust these two things, how else do you decide what is delectable tea and what is deadly poison?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QChdBRsDJIIMost reviews also praise it for some reason.
>>215651082https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWdd6_ZxX8c
>>215651414Hump
