This was really fucking good.
Kathryn Bigelow is guaranteed kino. This woman has my highest respect.
>>215655747>>215655814N shills get off my fucking board. this was the most mediocre slop in ages. Total waste of time.> nothing happens: the move =[> nothing happens: the movie DIRECTED BY A WOMAN =O
>>215656069>Everything happens>"Nothing happens"
>>215656069You seem unwell.
>>215656069>nothing happens: the move actually if you watch the credits and have subs on multiple [Explosions] texts are shown and heard over it
>>215655747it was not it had a shitty ending and as far as I know it was made by a woman
>>215656157>Ending make me think so ending bad
The point of a Rashomon story is to show how an event can be perceived can be perceived differently by people based on their personalities and biases, not to stretch out a story of by showing the same event over and over with minor inconsequential details added
>>215656405>war badfucking midwit.
Great movie otherwise, but the suicide made me laugh.
>>215655747Easily the most boring movie I have seen since House of Sand and Fog.
is that a prequel to the House of Ashur?
>>215656543Rashomon, nice
>>215656666Checked those Super Satan quads, figures you'd approve of suicide
>>215655747Act 1: president's voice sounds like TrumpAct 3: it's Idris Elba
Welp, our two intercepts failed.S'okay, we have fifty more left and a minute or two to try again."Nooo ... we need those if more showup"<boss has a rough day and goes crying to the parking lot>
>>215656850>He doesnt knowIt's Trump portraied by Idris Elba.
>>215656878no, it makes perfect sense. Watch Luther or The Wire and Elba patterns his American accent on Trump.
>>215656877The missile passed overhead. They were firing to intercept before; now they would be firing to catch up. Pay attention.
>>215655747Its cheap crap and a waste of time
This movie would have been better if it was just the Rebecca Ferguson parts stretched out for 90 minutes.
IMO, it was good but not great. First act was kino, but each subsequent act became more repetitive with less new (and important) information gleaned. The third act was the weakest by far IMO.Also, I didn't look at the cast before watching. When I heard the President's voice on comms, I got hyped as fuck because I thought it was Al Pacino. I was so ready for them to show him in the third act. Imagine my surprise when it ended up being Idris Elba. He's a fine actor, but I was a victim of my own expectations lol
Just watched this because it looked kind of fun, it was complete garbage. I don't know why I thought Netflix slop would be worth watching, if I knew the director was a woman I would've skipped it entirely.The dumbest part was when Baker jumped to his death before he even saw if the nuke hit.I can't believe they just did the exact same shit 3 times with barely anything different between them, what a glacial mess.
>>215658228The first two times were super kino, you just got filtered.
>>215658270The second time barely added anything new, it was all shit that could be obviously inferred from the first one. I should've thrown in the towel when the third act started.
>>215658349The second time added more than enough to justify it's existence. Some of the best scenes were from it.
>>215655747wokeslop plain and simple
why does Jason Clarke always play expert government drones who don't actually end up doing anything pivotal?why does Dumbledore's son an hero in everything?
>>215655747It was fucking garbage
>>2156557470/10prison for everyone involved
>>215655747Blueballs: the movie
This stupid fucking trend of showing different characters POVs over the same period is talentless and lazy. Weapons did it too. There's only like a handful of movies that it works
>What if we make a movie, where we don't bother to make an endingWhat a fucking waste of time. At least it showed the government being inept and indecisive, which is pretty accurate.
>>215658536It wasn't so bad in Weapons, and the characters were somewhat interesting. HoC was just bland and nothing happened.
>>215658590>NOOOO THE MOVIE MADE ME DO A THINK I CAN'T DO A THINK I DON'T WANNA SHIT MOVIE IT DIDN'T ASPLAIN TO MEEE
>>215656543This.
>>215658635>NOOOO THE MOVIE MADE ME DO A THINKAnyone who isn't a fucking retard knows what they would do in a MAD situation, there is no thinking involved.If you want a good nuke movie, just go watch Miracle Mile. I might give it a rewatch to take the taste of this slop out of my mouth.
>>215658674>Thinking he's only supposed to think about what he'd do in a MAD situationRetard alert.
>>215658674I'm fiending for a kino political thriller. which one should I watch first?>Miracle Mile>JFK>All the President's Men>Three Days of the Condor>The Hunt for Red October
>>215658635There was nothing to think about>What if Dr. Stranglelove, but replaced General Ripper with anonymous haxors, removed all the humor and also the 10 minutes of the film.If that makes you think, you are a retard
>>215658728>There was nothing to think aboutFor you. Most people aren't functionally retarded, however, and are capable of thinking about complex ideas instead of>DIS MOOVIE REMIND ME OF DIS OTHER MOOVIE BECAUSE DEY BOFF ABOUT NOOKS!! NO LIKE!!!!!
>>215658725JFK first, then Red October.
>>215658723What else is there to think about? Do you not understand MAD? Maybe you should look up what the acronym means.>>215658725Miracle Mile isn't really a political thriller, it's a shit hitting the fan type situation with an everyman protagonist. I'd go with Red October.
>>215658778>>215658789cool thanks
>>215658768Explain how this wet wet fart was so thought provoking then.
Weird movie, mid Bigelow. The 3 act/ensemble cast structure is the biggest problem. She's a master of tension and a nuke countdown is golden material for her. There are fantastic nail-biting moments in there even if it's just people talking on phones and looking at screens. But this screenplay choice of cutting off the real-time unfolding/build up and having no payoff does not work. The third act especially is a complete pacing killer. I can't tell if it wants to be a lean tense thriller or a satire on bureaucratic protocols. She's (and her MSM jew writer) also weirdly out of touch ideologically, that Obama stand-in feels disconnected from modern politics and she fucked up her attempt at conveying "nuke bad" message because any sane mind coming out of this would want to increase the defense budget instead of reducing nukes. And I'm tired of the pseudo-documentary style with shitflix photography, will date this poorly like Detroit, whereas a film like Strange Days is eternal.
>>215658789I'm genuinely insulted at being asked to explain what there is to think about other than MAD SHTF survival to do list. It's like being asked to prove pee isn't stored in the balls.Hey, here's an idea you vapidly retarded cocksucker. Maybe the gigantic fucking plot point about them not knowing where the fucking missile came from and how to respond was something to think about? About whether or not MAD would even be warranted in that fucking situation? About overreaction, retaliation, justification, etc.? Maybe if you weren't huffing whippets whenever you weren't huffing dick you'd be able to recognize and think about one of the key fucking points of the fucking film that it slaps you over your retarded dysgenic fucking head with you dumb little reddit rape offspring.
>>215658926He's a child who never watched anything like "when the wind blows" and thinks "nukes kill people!?" is some monumental new discovery.
why do you guys start chimping out whenever you don't agree with one another? how the hell do you survive in the real world (assuming you ever leave your bedrooms)? nobody would ever hire you or work for you or want to be your friend or love you
>>215658926See >>215658947
>>215658947In the absurd, fantasy situation in which there is no actionable intel and the US is completely caught with their dicks down with no sat coverage and the pentagon working overtime to determine the most likely target, yeah, you just nuke everyone. That's what MAD means.
>>215658950I watched When the Wind Blows years ago and this was on-par with it for the first two acts.
>>215658992Thanks for making your retardation clear for everyone to see and laugh at, clown.
>>215658943For me, it took a huge dive the second the president showed. I'm not even 13% as racist as the rest of you chucklefucks, but the pacing immediately fell apart, and the casting was highly questionable. The part where the POTUS asked that random guy in the limo what to do seemed rather explicit in why minorities shouldn't be in leadership positions.
>>215658973Is this your first day on 4chan?
>>215659017So I take it your response would be to roll over and die? Solid cuckold philosophy you've got there, shame you can't think beyond letting someone else fuck your wife.
>>215659042nah, been here since like 2010. I just don't understand how no one has grown up in the last 15 years. imagine being 40 or 50 and still getting into bitch fights on the internet
>>215658947You are missing the point that anyone, whoever it may be, who actively nukes Chicago is doing the world a favor and should be applauded.To answer your Question more seriously, the evidence for WHO SHOT NOOK would be answered immediately upon detonation, since the signature of the blast is very specifiic to the type of blast created.To answer cinematically, Southland Tales explored the aftermath of a random nuking much more realistically. This film was half baked, and Strange Days and Point Break remain the most essential Bigalow films. This was just a condemnation of DEI initiatives presented as a time filler.
1st act is kino2nd act is pretty good, I liked the scene with the deputy guy and the Russian foreign minister3rd act shits on all of the tension the last hour has set up with no new info gleaned aside from Cpt. Crozier killing himself and an extended Angel Reese cameo. Like the other anon said, this kind of Rashomon/The Last Duel style of plot only works if you are shedding new light on character decisions and previous scenes. It doesn’t work if we don’t see anything new about Elba’s character aside from him not wanting to start WW3
>>215659055>Roll over and dieOne (1) city is at risk. If you're not in Chicago, and your aim is to survive, then waiting for actual intel on who fired it, or waiting for an actual full strike is the best option. There's obviously problems with deciding to start a nuclear war with both Russia and China when North Korea might have gone apeshit by itself and you could glass them with less retaliatory damage.The fact you seemingly can't grasp this really shows just how dumb you are, seriously.
>>215659130ZDT was also very good outside of Chastain's Mary Sue extremes
>>215658973Fuck you fucking faggot ass casual. Go suck dick elsewhere.
>>215659078You can still get annoyed at retards when you're 30.
>>215656704Go back to watching "Stranger Things" and "Sandman" faggotSilly cunt why did you even bother to comment you degenerate retard
>>215659181ZDT was okay as film, but extremely destructive since it was big budge propoganda and a complete fabrication of events. The real story of how OBL was found and executed are fucking embarrassing, which is why this film was created.
>>215659236of course. how you respond demonstrates your emotional maturity and ability to self-modulate. critical soft skill in the real world
>>215659297>complete fabricationoverreach>real story of how OBL was found and executed are fucking embarrassingwhy?>big budget propagandaevery nation propagandizes. I'm glad we didn't condemn our ability to hunt down that rat fuck and take him out
>>215658973I have been here since 2007 and I assume a lot of people here have been also, maybe longer. The problem is arrested development. Some of us were like this as teens and then grew up, but it seems most didn't. They act today like they did when they were 15.
>>215659308This is 4chan, anon. You don't *need* to self-modulate when some dipshit annoys you. In fact, self-modulating is exhausting so arguing on the internet is a form of catharsis. I am enjoying my anger.
>>215659382>self-modulating is exhausting>I am enjoying my anger>[it's] a form of catharsissafe travels, anon
>>215659382You're not "self-modulating", you're being rational. It isn't a "I'm not going to get pissed mode" being turned on. It's the default. The way a lot of people behave here bleeds into their real life, it's unavoidable. And you shouldn't be people that need self-control to not be cunts. By default you shouldnt be prone to be one.
>>215659341>Be Pakistan>Know where OBL is hiding>Stay quiet>Eventually rat him out>US sends in death squad>No capture, no trial, no evidence, no body>The war drags on forever afterwards anywayIf you think is reasonable, you are the problem.Instead we got some OCD woman driving the men to keep searching for OBL every day until they finally do it just to shut her up.The dramatized raid was some good military ficiton, don't get me wrong, but it is no way to conduct foreign policy. It certainly didn't answer any questions about 9/11, which was allegedly the purpose of finding this guy.
>>215659412How is calling an annoying dipshit an annoying dipshit being a cunt? What in this thread has warranted you acting as if some line has been crossed?
>>215659454I may be the problem from your point of view, but you must realize that your point of view is immaterial and non-agenticI doubt a public trial goes much differently. he was a well-known Pan-Islamist who hated what America stood for and how it affected his slice of the world. we can see how other terrorist chiefs have held up in Gitmoyou don't stop jihad. violence just feeds the fire. look at Hamas, for instance. this is the nature of power. at the extremes of the civic arena, there is no stopping, only sublation/annihilation delayed by diplomacy/negotiation
>>215657626This
>>215659519Are you condemning violence, supporting genocide, or just a retard? Your post is very unclear on this.
>>215655747I want Rebecca Ferguson to hold my hand in these uncertain times.
>>215659564my point is plain to see. you just hate that I don't share your worldview. classic Osama move
>>215656543Rare perfect /tv/ post.
>>215659609Shut up or i'll knock down more of your stupid towers
>>215656666ok satan
>>215656850I thought it was Lance Henriksen before the Elbow reveal lol
even better than fail safe (2000)
>>215655747
>>215655747Yeah my wife's son loved it.
>>215655814Zero Dark was trash.
>>215660285No, it wasn't.
>>215656140Look it's a Jew making political psychiatry threats.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_UnionLets me know exactly that I should avoid this movie.
At first it was great.Then it got repetitive.
Jeff Daniels as the "Nuclear Launch HQ" general was excellent
>>215655814>>215655747kill yourself
>>215655747What a snorefest. Nothing Ever Happens: The Movie. What a waste of two hours. Nothing but whiny, angsty, low-IQ, emotionally fragile, unformed adults who are so ill-suited for their jobs that it is impossible to imagine how they were ever hired in the first place. What nonsense. A House of Dynamite is a movie written by and for silly, juvenile-minded adults.
Movie would have been kino if the first act was the same but with some president and war room parts, second act was russian perspective, and third act was whoever actually did the missile
>>215656543unironically 100% this
>>215660322And that concludes the stretching exercises for this year.
>>215659242Not the anon, but I've never seen a minute of Stranger Things and I've never even heard of Sandman. House of Dynamite is just not a good movie. It would have been better suited for a three-part mini series on Netflix or Amazon or Lifetime or Oxygen or some such women's network but it really isn't a good movie.
>>215660433That was Tracy Letts, but yeah he was good
Why didn't they just get a big net to catch the rocket?
>>215655747So I actually dislike it but not for obvious reasons. It's actually very well made as far as pacing, atmosphere, and tension go, and the ending being left ambiguous works perfectly fine for me. The main issue is that Kathryn Bigelow clearly has no fucking clue how nuclear wargaming works or how the US would ACTUALLY react in such a situation. If things went down the way they do in the film, there would be absolutely no reason for the US to launch a pre-emptive nuclear strike on the entire world. The single most rational thing to do would be to wait for the missile to hit, find out who's responsible (which would be extremely easy to do given every nuke's radiation pattern can be traced back to where it was made), and only THEN would the US need to consider retaliating. By all means, you'd still need to get the president and essential staff into the bunkers, and probably declare martial law in the meantime, but the way the film unironically suggests that the president would consider, let alone actually choose, full scale nuclear war is so beyond retarded it made it impossible for me to enjoy the film. I suspect the director was trying to communicate an anti-nuke agenda but neglected doing her research. otherwise decent flick>t. masters in international securities with a focus on nuclear weaponry
>>215661372and to clarify - as other anons have pointed out, as damaging as a nuke hitting chicago would be, the US' ability to launch a nuclear strike wouldn't damaged in the slightest. There is no rush at all to respond. Keep in mind also that with the entire rest of the world now on high alert, there's no hope at all of a pre-emptive strike on russia and china succeeding at wiping them out before they had time to launch against the US, so it would be total suicide. I really wish the film had made more an attempt to make the possibility of launching the nukes more reasonable (e.g. there being some evidence that russia and china really were planning something against the US or there being some kind of miscommunication with them that makes the president mistakenly think they're gonna launch first), because otherwise the only real message of the film is "nukes are dumb and bad" without any consideration for real world geopolitics.
>>215661204honestly had no idea they were different people lmao
>>215661372>>215661424they address this by saying they can't risk letting more nukes launch in case this was a "test" to determine our cold-bloodedness this. they want to launch first so that they played their hand either as a deterrent or in nuclear armageddon rather than risking passive annihilation
>>215659130>>215658590>>215658943I was gonna say the weirdest thing I got from this movie is that despite ostensibly being some form of pacifist film about the horrors of war and escalation, it ends up coming across like a manifesto for the government being MORE militarised and ready to respond effectively. Hell you specifically see the most competent, action-oriented individuals being the military and the intelligence officials vs all the high up elected officials being portrayed as incompetent and indecisive. then you literally have them showing FEMA as being run by a diversity hire sassy sheboon that the film itself portrays and describes as inexperienced and underqualified for the role she's being put into by the emergency. It's almost surreal. And then the film ends with this super hawkish, god worshipping military dude with the nuclear options book actually seeming like the most decisive individual present vs the literal president. it's kinda surreal
Unironically, why didn't a fighter jet or a turret just shoot the missile down over the ocean?>hitting a bullet with another bulletExcept the missile is the size of a motorbike and you have insanely sophisticated machinery designed to do exactly that.
>>215661480I get that they say this in the film but you need to understand how retarded this is in the context of the movie's scenario.let me show you three possible scenarios1.>the US pre-emptively launches all of its nukes at its adversaries for no reason before the nuke even lands>all of them instantly retaliate before the US' nukes even hit their targets>america, china, russia and allies all die in nuclear firescenario 2.>the us. tanks the hit and doesn't respond immediately, it waits to find out>russia and china for some reason decide to launch all their nukes at the US immediately because ??? some bullshit about it making them look weak>the us instantly launches all of its nukes at russia and china, they all die in nuclear hellfirescenario 3.>the US waits for the missile to hit in order to analyse its signature and determine the culprit, only then will they retaliate>it makes it clear to russia and china that this is their intention >the culprit is caught and everyone else fucks them for launching a nuke unprovokeddo you see how in the first two scenarios, it's suicide for everyone involved, whilst the third scenario is the only one where china, the us, and russia don't all immediately die in nuclear hellfire?
>>215659308If you can't differentiate between the real world and online you absolutely have no business being on the internet.
>>215661670I do, but that assumes a world of totally rational actors. as the movie shows, rationale and rational trust (honor-based) can unravel quickly in scenarios as existentially threatening as actual nuclear launch. you never know what a madman may do, and almost all superpower world leaders have moments of extreme hubrisI agree that it's retarded, and I think the movie agrees that it's retarded. that's why the whole thing is that it's absolutely fucking retarded that we're all negotiating with each other while living in a house that can kill all of us
>>215661653you clearly do not understand how nukes work. Proper nuclear ICBMs, at least of the range and type displayed in the film, travel high up into space (far, far out of the range of any jet or turret) and then come crashing back down, all of which happens at mach fuck. The only things that can reliably intercept them are super specialised pieces of equipment (like the interceptors we see in the film), which themselves are not very reliable because 1. what you're trying to hit is travelling at near-orbital velocity and 2. it can only really be viably targeted at certain stages in its' flight path (hence why there's only a short window in the film where they try to hit it and then cannot try again once this fails). There are theories that in the terminal phase (i.e. when it's about to hit a city in a straight descent) some of our modern anti-missile systems could still shoot them down; Israel's iron dome iirc managed to get a couple Iranian ballistic missiles during the recent conflict in this way, but many still got through and it was very much a cointoss. but yeah you can't hit a fucking ICBM with a jet or a turrettldr you can't because it's in fucking space
>>215661738if you have to act differently online and irl, then you have weak character and spirit
>>215661775why don't we build and send up a permanent military base manned with like a million interceptors so you can get a lot of shots at it and knock it the f out
>>215661785They're fundamentally different context. Acting the same means you literally have inability to adapt to the environment. Even in the real world you don't act the same way at work as you do at home. You don't talk to your friends the same way you talk to your mother. Its basic shit anon- If this is news to you you've clearly missed on the social development that people tend to have as soon as they start being sent off to pre-school.
>>215661653Same reason the USSR couldn't do it with the U2 or SR71 spyplanes, they fly too fast and too high. Only missiles work and even then they only work in very specific circumstances like if you detect it early and if it doesn't change course.
>>215661593>ends up coming across like a manifesto for the government being MORE militarised and ready to respond effectively.directed by the glowiest of the glowies filmmaker in hollywood, no shit
>>215661751I agree with you that the whole scenario is totally retarded (and I do actually think the movie has a pretty good attempt at showing how miscommunication between great powers can happen at a high level during crises) but I need you to understand that the world is nonetheless not THAT retarded. There are direct contact lines available 24/7 between the heads of state (or acting heads of state) of china, russia, and the US specifically designed for a scenario depicted in the film. Moreover, the US has set protocols for "rogue individual nuke from unknown actor hits the US" that each president, and each of the US' rivals, would be more than aware of and party to. It simply wouldn't happen the way it does in the US. Also the idea that anyone would "struggle to get a hold of" the president in any shape or form in the way depicted in the movie is fucking laughable. the way it would go IRL is>president immediately contacts russia and china on a joint call and confirms neither claims responsibility>all the staff taken to bunkers, martial law declared before the nuke even hits + evacuation/shelter alert sent to all the probable cities before it's even confirmed it's chicago>president agrees with russia/china that he's going to go on high alert/readiness as a precaution but will take no action beyond this until the nuke hits and they determine who is responsible from the radiation signature>everyone then waits, in a high state of tension, but with no further nukes being fired (unless either russia or china really did want to start a nuclear war in which case everyone is fucked either way)it would not go any other way. Putin literally phonecalled trump in the oval office at a moment's notice the other week. in general everything in the movie actually happens much more slowly than it would irl.
>>215661847you're justifying being racist and/or moronically hostile and/or other forms of retarded while anonymous as an apparently healthy learned social behavior in your worldthat in itself explains why you're trying to justify itthe fact that that's the environment is the sad part. people here are mostly in their 20s or older. it's subhuman shit
>>215661916*the way it does in the film
>>215661916>the US has set protocols for "rogue individual nuke from unknown actor hits the US" that each president, and each of the US' rivals, would be more than aware of and party toI hope that's true>the idea that anyone would "struggle to get a hold of" the president in any shape or form in the way depicted in the movie is fucking laughableyeah, this contributed to a weak third act. it made more sense for him to be going in and out if he's in some sort of absolutely next-gen safety bunkerI'm not sure that the scenario you outlined is the only way it goes. that's the rational way, sure, but when world's end is literally minutes away, it's just not the same as talking about it casually on a comfy Sunday night. people break over white-collar work deadlines. the sheer terror that would come with an actual nuclear launch is unfathomable. things can definitely go real bad
>>215661917Hopefully one day you'll make some actual friends who don't act like complete faggots when you get into a heated argument with them.
>>215661970>I'm not sure that the scenario you outlined is the only way it goes. that's the rational way, sure, but when world's end is literally minutes away, it's just not the same as talking about it casually on a comfy Sunday night. people break over white-collar work deadlines. the sheer terror that would come with an actual nuclear launch is unfathomable. things can definitely go real badI completely get that, but see that's kind of the key of my issue with a film. This is EXACTLY what good nuclear drama should have at its core - the dangers of misunderstandings, the risks of escalation, the stakes of nuclear war vs people acting like retards in an emergency, all that is great stuff. My issue is that the film does a bad job of presenting these dilemmas in the first place. I.e. if the film had presented a realistic way for the misunderstanding between the US, china, and russia to unfold, or a realistic reason for the president to seriously consider nuking them, then I'd have loved the film. But it doesn't do that - it presents this ludicrous scenario, incorrectly portrays how the US would react, and then suddenly pretends like the president has no choice but to seriously consider nuking russia and china, which WITHIN THE SCENARIO OF THE FILM, he does not. Do you get what I mean? Caps are for emphasis not anger btw.
>>215662128I definitely see your point. I'm of the camp that it was a decent film (like 6/10), but with each act being weaker than the prior. it really should have stayed in the situation room with Rebecca Ferguson. they could've just showed other POVs/rooms throughout for key moments. the repetitive acts made it feel half-baked unfortunately
>>215662072I have those friends, that's how I know anons need to breathe lol
>>215662391I'd agree with that. The first act is so tightly presented and well made that I could almost forgive the retarded geopolitics. The second and third not adding anything just rubbed it in until it became unbearable. >>215656543 makes a great point too about the second and third acts not really adding much of substance at all. The one saving grace of the movie for me were the scenes of the military guys doing their jobs directly (specifically the bomber pilots and the interceptor missile base guys), they were somewhat unrealistic but I liked the focus on service personnel "just doing their jobs" in the face of existential horror. wish they'd spent more time on the moral dilemma of the B2 pilots.
>>215655814She hasn't made any slop worth watching since Patrick Swayze was alive.
I like movies where nothing happens.
>>215661799Anyone with perfect defensive measures against nukes has less to fear from using them. it also prompts a military arms race in space to undermine your defensive measures which is an inherently offensive action which itself can escalate to war which can become nuclear in nature. Its also an insanely expensive system that would only really be justified to create if you planned on actually using it relatively soon.
>>215662669surely we can build in space in secret. elon has all the satellites up there. just launch in american airspace in the middle of some desert or something and issue a curfew around all the surrounding zip codes
>>215662730No, the major players all have systems that track anything getting launched, radars, satellites, etc. Any sudden and unannounced rocket launch triggers the kind of "Oh shit what is going on" that we see in the first stages of the events of this movie where they have to figure out what it is, where its going, who launched, and so on. Most of the time its a false alarm and nothing happens, every so often its North Korea launching dud missile over Japan or Russia launching conventional warheads at Ukraine and people have to figure out if its a first strike scenario as soon as the launch is detected.
>>215663013interesting. thanks anon
>>215655747This actually might be the worst movie of the year
>>215664506And somehow one of the better short films.
Anyone else think it's weird how Rebecca Ferguson has been completely slotted into Jessica Chastain's role in Hollywood? Even down to the mommy aspect.
>>215655747>WOAH HECKIN SCARY WHAT IF RUSSIA NUKED US I GOT LITERAL GOOSEBUMPS
>>215655814James Cameron ghost writes all her kino. This is common knowledge
Does it actually look and feel like a real movie or is it some typical Netflixy looking slop?
>>215656543The point of a Rashomon story can be whatever it wants to be. Despite common perception, each of the stories in Rashomon was an explicit self-serving except the final one. There was no 'percieved the situation differently'.The point in AHOD is to show the perspectives of the people at the bottom rung, the middle rung, and the top rung, and how the conclusion is the same regardless.
>>215656155I speaky the englishI don't use subtitles
>>215655747this almost put me to sleepidris elba was funny as a president, basicaly on the same level as Hugh Grant in Love Actually
>>215659078>>215659308>>215659410>>215659412People can have bad days especially when they're chronically deprived of REM sleep and someone is acting like a smarty pants while missing the whole point of the movie. In such cases channeling anger to throw in ad hominems is the only way to sum up enough energy to reply.
>>215661775>Peru nukes CaliforniaStrange graphic but okay
>>215662463>moral dilemma of the B2 pilots.This would just be a retread of Dr. Strangelove and other, better nuclear films.
>>215655747pure kino. only capeshit niggers who expected zogmerica to nuke everyone on screen are dissapointed by it. if you are a high iq kinoseur you will appreciate this masterpiece.
>>215670023You don't know the meaning of the word.
This board is truly filled with retards.
