>*proves ur favorite film is objectively bad using facts and logic*your response?
tldr
films are an emotional experience. only autists and psychopaths think everything must be rational and logical.
>>215670252I hate eceleb faggots so much its unreal
>>215670252Objectively bad films can be great. Needing this explained to you is inhuman.
>>215670252>gave up doing real film analysis to exclusively chat aimlessly about the latest slop on discord calls with his furry butt buddies and call it contentI get it though, it's much easier and rakes in money from parasocial fans
>>215670252Locked
>>215670252I don’t think MauLer even claims to do that. I think he proves using facts and logic whether a plot makes sense, whether character behaviors make sense, and whether good storytelling techniques were used to tell the story. Your personal determination of Good/bad is inherently subjective when it comes to art and he would agree with that. But you knew that already.
>>215670252To make a better film, obviously. What else? Start a shit flinging war on Xitter and turn my online tantrums against anonymous critics into what I'm known for? Who would do something like that?
>>215670297The opposite.A movie that is only enjoyable though emotions is objectively bad
>>215670252Clearly has autism. Why even give him the clicks? Just laugh and move on.
>>215670252>my favorite movie ends with a White Guy ad a Nigger hanging a woman and laughing at her as she diesNope , it was Kino
>>215670252Who cares? What I want to know is how he's recovering from the brutal beating Mike Stoklasa gave him. What the hell, Mike. What the hell.
>>215670252>Fart huffing furfag
>>215671601You like the foced nigger blowjob movie that much? That's so weird!
>>215670393I respect him for also bringing on right wing normal people, but it's kind of psychotic the ratio of shitlib furries to normal humans. Rags, Wolf, Jay, Das, Deorio, Destiny, Actman, etc etc
>>215671501You are objectively a gay retard
>>215671723You're allowed to like bad movies. It's just unhealthy to pretend they're not shit.
>>215670252Why does his mask have a keyhole?
>>215670252>filmThis faggot doesn't watch films. He watches flicks and capeshit.
>>215670252I would rather watch something brief and funny, like Nerdrotic or Drinker. I hate long-form yt videos, they are an affront to nature. Some of his stuff is several hours long too... I mean just watch the fucking movie by that point. It will take you less time and you can come up with your own opinion on it.He is an alright dude btw, and the BBC podcast he does with those other two is fun to listen to while gaming or working out or whatever. But godamn, watching his stuff from start to finish should be classified as a mental disorder
>>215671837>Literal longman bad in the wildYou should be embarrassed
>>215671707>DestinyDestiny came on? I would've thought he'd regard MauLer as a Nazi or something.
>>215671837>watching his stuff from start to finish should be classified as a mental disorderVery few people do this, moron. You realise youtube has a pause function, right?
>>215671837>bbc podcastwhat?
>>215670252should art be looked through a lens of logic and facts?
>>215670252This faggot and his gang break down and over analysed a bunch of chucky movies for fuck sake.Only decent thing hes done was his review of 'The Father'
>open random episode of his podcast>its a bunch of gays laughing and having fun, talking about why some slop is bad>this makes /tv/ shake with rageI will never understand why you people don't just move on, did he ignore your superchat? Did he criticise something you like? Is it that you're jealous that they have people to discuss media with?
>>215672858Oh right one non-blockbuster film he watched and liked and he announces it everywhere (and how he likes Anthony Hopkins) to debunk accusations that he only watches Marvel and Star Wars.
>>215670252who?
Isnt this faggot a pedo or something? Can he even analyze it from a metaphysical perspective or is he too much of a lazy midwit to just be like‘IT MAKES LE NO LOGIC FOR LE CHARACTER TO ACT LIKE’- No shit autist thats why it is called a movie
>pretends to be detail-oriented autist>gets confused by child's play 1 after not paying attention because he thinks the movie is "beneath" him
>>215672772They call it their show real BBC on jewtube cause the one in bongland is a heap of turds.
>>215673099>‘IT MAKES LE NO LOGIC FOR LE CHARACTER TO ACT LIKE’->No shit autist thats why it is called a movieCope, faggot.What you are describing is a bad movie
>>215670252He's still on that "objectively good/bad" shtick? God, this guy is a pompous retard.
report eceleb threads as off topic
>>215670252Frankly, if it was possible, I would call him and his gay little pals out on their hypocrisy and illiterate approach to film criticism that relies on a misunderstanding of what their holy objectivity is. But the fact is that they're too locked into an echo chamber of circular penis glucking to recognize reason when they hear it, not that they hear much reason from the goyslop-consuming mongoloids they surround themselves with. So really I wouldn't waste my time.
>>215673908>objectively good/bada thing that it's factually true, inbred
>>215670252>why do you let drinker speak to you like that
>>215673193The child's play movies are garbage, there's nothing to "understand", end of story.
>internal consistency is badt. /tv/
>>215670252I don't understand why /tv/ hates him, he seems like your average /tv/ poster except less openly a pedophile.
>>215674292You don't know what words mean, my ESL friend.
>>215674352>I don't understand why /tv/ hates himHe and his gay buddies have cornered the market on antiwoke and parade around like they represent objective criticism for media. Despite this anon clearly shilling for him >>215674342 it extends well beyond internal consistency, and he will frequently critique things that are subjective. He suffers the same faults as drinker in that his taste is incredibly inept. It becomes immediately obvious whenever he's not bashing on whatever the slop of the month is.
>>215670252Maybe if I took it very slowly and step-by-step I could demonstrate to him the logical gap between "I perceive a logical inconsistency in this story" and "this is objectively bad"Though it's very unlikely he'd agree to speaking with anyone without his support group to keep him safely immersed in delusion.
>"It was the best of times"Well, that's presumptive. How do you know times were so great? Where's your objective proof?>"It was the worst of times."Wow. one sentence in, and already we have an ideological inconsistency. Who does this author think he is?
>>215670252>your response?I cum again
>>215670297Correct.
>>215672925He was based until he criticized a zack snyder movie and which point /tv/jeets couldn't handle it. It shouldn't matter to them anymore, since the crew has had arguably more to say on more recent DC capeshit projects.
>>215670326Maulerfags just consistently prove their idiocy.
Please explain why he uses pre Endgame marvel movies as examples of good/positive filmmaking. Is this an Andy Kauffman style long-con prank?Is he trying to discredit himself?Is he retarded?Is he a massive hypocrite?
