>79% on rotten tomatoes how? this is high kino compared to modern sloppa
>>215674254Well people weren't reviewing it against the movies of today years ago when it came out. Really they weren't even rating it against other movies of the time, they were rating it against the other pirates movies.
>>215674254Does anyone know how to live in a constantly dark environment Tortuga POTC like location? Shit is so comfy looking. Just getting wasted with tavern wenches all day and night in darkly lit bars with candles n shit.
>>215674295red dead 1 has an area like it. its the only thing i can think of or duskwood in wow
>>215674295If you want night time forever just go to Alaska and lurk in mountain villages that have at least 2 bars. If it’s winter time it will be always dark but you’ll also be very cold
Rotten Tomatoes has 44% for Mortal Kombat, yet it's pure kino. Those retards have no clue what a good movie is. Even good Arnie movies like Conan and Predator etc have 60%ish
>>215674275>the other pirates movies.anon its the first one
The Mummy is better than most Marvel flicks that get 90% or more.
>>215674331Dark souls 2
>>215674506the mummy is at like 63% and is high kino
>>215674254How many of the reviews were after the heard court case
>>215674506Love a good adventure movie, shame they're all very few and far between or complete shit. All the best ones seem to be around the early 00s too.
>>215674497Oh, I blindly assumed OP was talking about one of the later ones without actually looking at the imageFucked if I know then, snobs who think they're too good for it maybe
>>215674254Raiders of the lost Ark is a way better movie
>>215674254
>>215674254from 90s to 2010 are all good movies. Ratings can be ignored. Best time period for innovative stories and ideas in my opinion. Everything since is remake
>>215674254I always really liked the line, "You'd best start believing in ghost stories, you're in one." for a ghost to say.
>>215674254It’s 22 years old and standards were different then
>>215674295Asmongold never turns his lights on and has nearly completed his transformation into a moleman.
>>215674275It was great when it came out, too. Genuinely a timeless classic.
>>215674540Adventures of TinTin was pretty good
>>215674275It was actually considered corny and medicore back when it released. We couldn't have known just how bad things are gonna get.
>>21567425479% isn't a bad score. You retards see everything as black and white.
>>215674254Review websites are mostly full of bots and shillsPirates is 79% because it hasn't been botted and the few genuine users there are the sort of retards who only give good grades to shitty "avant garde" crap like Parasite which was a boring piece of crapYou want good reviews, just go on the internet on forums and look out for biases, or use YouTube (particularly reviews not done by people who are consoomers or obviously bought out), that will get you through easily>>215675613Nah, Pirates 1 was beloved, the original trilogy in general was. It was only considered mediocre when reviewed by people who clearly don't like the genre and are stuck-up pompuous faggots who only watch Citizen Kane and Metropolis and trash like that which only they enjoy
>>215676622Wrong. Listen to this review of Pirates 2 by Mark Kermode recorded at the time of release where he calls the franchise the 'death of cinema'.https://youtu.be/oLsqIrXIcbs?si=SJOAR2YVzYF3E7dI
>>215674254>17-year-old cleavage.
>>215677082>Oy vey muh film criticFilm critics are objectively worthless elitist assholes who get bought out by big companies to suck their cocks daily. Idk who this faggot is, nor do I care, but suggesting that a fucking Pirates of the Caribbean flick is "the death of cinema" is so pathetically tonedeaf it's hilarious. Meanwhile he probably would or does suck off shit like the modern Disney reboots for "diversitay"Like I said, stuck up pompuous faggot who isn't even consistent in his beliefs and has to overexaggerate his opinions because nobody would watch his shit show if he didn't. You can indeed dislike PotC but saying it's the literal end of cinema is absurd
>>215674254What's up with that font
>>215674295Invent a time machine and go back to the north of England circa 1975.
