Does his argument hold up from a philosophical standpoint?
let's ask the Greeks
>>215694703I've been madly lustful towards women who I despise and would never want to be romantically involved with so to an extent, yes. Sex and romance have a lot of overlap, but they're not always the same thing.
you can suck a dick and be incapable of falling in love with a man
>>215694711They fucked boys, not men.
>>215695649>>215694738Homosexuality has nothing to do with romantic love.
>>215694703Having relationships with woman and sex with men is somehow even gayer than just having relationships with men.
>>215695756says who?
>>215695786Homosexuality is the sexual attraction to people of the same sex. No where in that definition is romantic feeling or emotional companionship necessary. If your dick gets hard to men and you have sex with men you are gay.
>>215695811where did you get this definition?
>>215694711>>215695717They did neither, "Greeks/Romans were gay lol" is a myth perpetuated by the usual suspects.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNAT4ybsz_Ehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QVh3kj7CjAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9G5pDs40iiUhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOeiInUzkzw
>>215696424Obviously I'm not going to bother watching any of your videos but that fourth one sure looks unrelated, like you're some kind of faggot.
>>215696424Massive cope. Cicero even made fun of Greeks for it.
I think it would be better to be romantically attracted to men and sexually attracted to women, since men are actually empathic.
