The dust now settled, are we finally mature and old enough to admit that Fellowship is the only good movie and masterpiece of this trilogy?Two Towers and Return of the Shit are basically boring proto-capeshit action flicks that lack all the fantasy magic and comfy feel of adventure of the original.It's no surprise years later these films are only shilled by rigt-wing chuddies due to the obviosu fascist undertones (for example the ride of Theoden which has a bunch of white people ride to their deaths against the evil orcs while blatantly ignoring any political context and discussion, class commentary on why poor mistreated Rohirrim would march for their rich "king" cladden in gold) and other such fascist nonsense that you have to shut your brain down and see it as a little kid with 0 knowledge of the world to even relate to
0/10 bait
two towers is for males who have sex
>>216005688Bumping a Tolkien thread, Two Towers is great, but ROTK is full of quips. It's still a good movie.
>>216005688I like how at the start of two towers it's a horror film
>>216005688They were all filmed at the same time with the same people on the same set in the same location. Every film is magical.You’re a loser tranny who spends all day online trying and failing to convince people that 10/10 movies are bad.Your life is meaningless.
>>216005688>The dust now settled, are we finally mature and old enough to admit that Fellowship is the only good movie and masterpiece of this trilogy?Yes. Even the book start to suck after Fellowship unironically.
>>216005688>The dust now settled, are we finally mature and old enough to admit that Fellowship is the only good movie and masterpiece of this trilogy?tl;dr stopped reading there and no
Fellowship is the only 10/10 film in the trilogy, but they're all excellent.
>>216007091What about when they reach the Volcano
>>216005688I have issues with RoTK, in particular the butchering of Denethor and the Ghost army deus ex machina, but it's still excellent. I would say FoTR 10/10, TTT 9/10, RoTK 8/10 are fair ratings.
>>216005688First movie is bad because it skips essential book parts like Tom Bombadil and hobbits being trapped by undead.
>>216005688The Two Towers was the best book.
>>216005688The Two Towers and Return of the King are both inferior to Fellowship, mostly for different reasonsHowever, they have the highest highs of the trilogy (and the lowest lows)
>masterpiece There's not a single LotR movie that is a masterpiece. At the end of the day they are still Hollywoodish childish blockbusters.
>>216008353Then by that logic, King fucking sucks because they omitted Scourging of the Shire, which is true as it's probably the best chapter in the whole book.
