/tv/ - Is your lust for a person good enough of a reason - Television & Film

Anonymous

11/18/25(Tue)05:26:27 No.216008744

Anonymous 11/18/25(Tue)05:26:27 No.216008744 Archived

Is your lust for a person good enough of a reason to cast her as a protagonist in your new 100 million dollar production?

Anonymous
11/18/25(Tue)05:28:31 No.216008766

Anonymous 11/18/25(Tue)05:28:31 No.216008766

>>216008744
He's married and she's a good actress. Can't you just start a Pluribus thread without some nonsense headline?

Anonymous
11/18/25(Tue)05:30:16 No.216008777

Anonymous 11/18/25(Tue)05:30:16 No.216008777

>>216008744
If she looked like this, sure. He should also have cast Betsy Kettleman as her wife, with full nude sex scenes.

Anonymous
11/18/25(Tue)05:33:17 No.216008813

Anonymous 11/18/25(Tue)05:33:17 No.216008813

>>216008744
She was the breakout character of better call saul, of course he's going to utilise her in future projects

Anonymous
11/18/25(Tue)05:33:59 No.216008822

Anonymous 11/18/25(Tue)05:33:59 No.216008822

>>216008777
>looked like this
Like a hag?

Anonymous
11/18/25(Tue)05:40:19 No.216008892

Anonymous 11/18/25(Tue)05:40:19 No.216008892

File: IMG_7107.jpg (21 KB, 414x414)

Does /tv/ really not find her attractive?

Anonymous
11/18/25(Tue)05:45:07 No.216008945

Anonymous 11/18/25(Tue)05:45:07 No.216008945

>>216008813
>of course he's going to utilise her
Why not hire a good actor instead?

Anonymous
11/18/25(Tue)06:55:35 No.216009681

Anonymous 11/18/25(Tue)06:55:35 No.216009681

>>216008822
Faggot detected. It couldn't be more obvious that you fuck men.

Anonymous
11/18/25(Tue)07:04:09 No.216009793

Anonymous 11/18/25(Tue)07:04:09 No.216009793

Yes