[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


why did the audience turn their backs on twin peaks in 1991?
>>
>>216008856
because they had no idea what to do with the show after they were forced to solve the murder. it's plainly obvious while watching that it goes off the rails after that. the back half of season 2 is barely tolerable now in the digital age where you can binge it, imagine watching it as the audience back then.
>>
>>216008881
There's some good individual bits happening in that slump era, but it's really obvious how aimless it is. For every decent arch in that period like Ben Horne goes civil war theres an even more pointless and more annoying James plot.
The actors are trying but the spine of the show is gone.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.