>>216020163Dune. And running man I guess, but someone is going to have to give you their opinion on the book. I never read it so don't know if it qualifies as good source material.
>>216020163All of Star Wars.
>>216020163Start with Prometheus.
yeah, good luck trying to convince people to spend millions remaking a movie that flopped and everyone hates.
>>216020163so, another Tron movie? Who knows. Maybe this will be the time that it works
If I could make any movie I wanted I'd remake Zardoz.
>>216020163I'm not sure remake is the right term if you're trying to make a better adaptation of something that's had a failed adaptation. I suppose maybe you're trying to ride on some "We're doing it right this time!", but it's usually better to ignore the bad version entirely.
>>216020286That would be a demake, it needs no improving
>>216020396
>>216020292i don't think anyone thinks studios would go along with this but it unironically is what remakes should be
I uniroonically think a remake of "Deathbed: the bed that eats (1977)" would be great because that movie has very interesting ideas, but the execution is god awful. And it has a name recoginition attached to it.
Spawnthey can bring back john leguizamo though. i liked him
>>216020527The animation and cgi was crazy good in 1997 bro, what do you mean with Spawn not meeting expectations
I would love to see a remake of Metropolis, with modern VFX and production values. Problem is tho, that Hollywood would also attach modern writers for the modern audience, and some how find a way to make blatant commie propaganda even more retarded and insufferable
>>216020604>The animation and cgi was crazy good in 1997 bro, what do you mean with Spawn not meeting expectationsThat's like 30 minutes of the movie. You're forgetting the other hour of the movie being michael jai white in shitty makeup crying to a magical hobo that his wife is banging some new guy.
>>216020689>remake of MetropolisEw no
>>216020689>I would love to see a remake of Metropolis, with modern VFX and production values. Problem is tho, that Hollywood would also attach modern writers for the modern audience, and some how find a way to make blatant commie propaganda even more retarded and insufferablewasnt that basically Megalopolis ( i never saw it)
>>216020292this >>216020477Go remake John Carter or Warcraft
>>216020292They made 2 Tron sequels didn't they?
>>216020163i like you're thinking.it's not like they could fuck them up more, right?right?
>>216020163Better idea.Instead of remaking movies, they should make new movies.
>>216020163A proper Do Androids Dream movie>>216020250It's in theater right now
>>216020847i dont fucking know man. no one watched megalopolis. i just want muh chrome tiddies
>>216020163A waterworld remake probably wouldv'e been good about 10 years agoNow I no longer trust hollywood to be able to make a good movie that isn't filled with cgi jeetslop
>>216020163Has this successfully happened before?Remember X-Men 3 and then Dark Phoenix?
Imagine a big budget Pyun movie. It would be amazing.
>>216020163After Earth has a really cool premise, humans revisiting a planet that has evolved past anything they ever knew. Too bad it turned out to be shit.
>>216020163Just one more go at a Death Note series/movie bro. High Production. In and out, we know what to do now. I promise.
>>216020163>using Telnet in 2025just use SSH
>>216020163Remakes are a commercial phenomenon, a cynical effort to minimize the risks inherent in selling a film by utilizing an IP with a pre-existing reputation. They're never going to spend time remaking movies like Ghost Ship or Cube 2: Hypercube because there's next to no commercial value in it
