Rank them from best to worst as directors/filmmakers based on their peak.Who has the strongest overall filmography out of those four?What is your favorite movie out of their combined filmographies?What is your least favorite movie out of their combined filmographies?If you had to pick two of them whose movies (past and future) you can never see again, which two would you pick?
>Rank them from best to worst as directors/filmmakers based on their peak.Cameron > Tarantino > Villeneuve > Nolan>Who has the strongest overall filmography out of those four?Tarantino > Cameron > Villeneuve > Nolan>What is your favorite movie out of their combined filmographies?T2>What is your least favorite movie out of their combined filmographies?Not sure but probably something Nolan made>If you had to pick two of them whose movies (past and future) you can never see again, which two would you pick?Fuck that's hard. Thought about it for like 5 minutes and can't decide.
They are all hacks.
bump
>>216037754>>216038070> If you had to pick two of them whose movies (past and future) you can never see again, which two would you pick?Easy as fuck. Villanueva and Tarintino
>>216037754Nolan > Villeneuve >>> Cameron >>> power gap > the turd I dropped this morning >>> TarantinoIMHO we haven't seen Villeneuve's best movie yet.
>>216039889Lost respect for villlifagghot after the dune movies. I can live one thousand lifetimes, miss his next movie and would give a fuck not once.
>>216039840Nolan over Tarantino? Not sure I could do it. Never think about rewatching any of Nolan's movies.
>>216037754Cameron > Tarantino > Vil > NolanAlthough I'm really indifferent towards Villeneuve.>Who has the strongest overall filmography out of those four?You could argue either Cameron or Tarantino, but Tarantino irritates me.>What is your favorite movie out of their combined filmographies?T2>What is your least favorite movie out of their combined filmographies?Prisoners is pretty close to the worst, but Oppenheimer takes the cake.>If you had to pick two of them whose movies (past and future) you can never see again, which two would you pick?Hell, I'll happily discard three of them.>>216039889Dumb zoomer.
Cameron > Villeneuve > Nolan > rodent poop > Tarantino Villeneuve Dune: Part Two (you didn't say best)Pulp FictionNolan, Tarantino
If you like Tarantino, you're either 16 or barely human.
>>216040439Same goes for Nolan and Villeneuve.
>>216040448No.
>>216040478Both are considerably worse, and both appeal to teenagers who think they have good taste and watch films with more depth than normies. Tarantino at least can stage a scene, and has a few borrowed ideas that are interesting.
1. Quentin. Actually made films that, dare I say, changed the landscape of cinema.2. James Cameron. Made entertaining films that withstood the test of time. memorable with whimsy.3. Christopher Nolan. Made entertaining films that people act like are groundbreaking, then 5 years later they don't care. 4. Villenueve. Same as Nolan but after 90 days no one cares.
>>216040507You're such a pretentious dimwit. Genuinely wish nothing but humiliation on you.
>>216040552>changed the landscape of cinemaL M A O
You know what's the greatest thing about Tarantino? Not only do his movies lack artistic merit beyond wasting ludicrously high budgets on aping grindhouse sludge, they also don't sell. Most astroturfed garbage director ever.
>>216040568Pretentious dimwit? Target audience for a Villenueve film then.
>>216037754Cameron>Tarantino>Villeneuve>>>>Nolan
>>216040714Rather that than whatever Nolan and Villenueve are doing.
>>216040720You say that, but you're a literal midwit, so it's to be ignored.>>216040742>Whatever Yeah, exactly. You can't tell. Because they unironically filter your 110 IQ reddit ass.
>>216040803>but you're a literal midwitFirst I'm a dimwit, then I'm a midwit. Why can't I just be normal?>Because they unironically filter your 110 IQ reddit ass.Nolan can't even direct, and Villeneuve is so dull that I'm tempted to pick Nolan over him even though he's completely incompetent.
>>216040845>First I'm a dimwit, then I'm a midwit. Why can't I just be normal?All the same.
>>216040870I'm being good humored about it. Nobody who thinks Nolan or Villeneuve are good directors should be calling anyone a midwit.
When it comes to raw talent and technical know-how I think Cameron might be the all-time #1.
Cameron > rest
