Why did Daily Wire pussy out?
>>216043496Why did they put Ben Shapiro in drag? Was is supposed to be a parody of the left?
>>216043496She has a nice ass. Someone post some pics and videos before the thread dies. Whoever's fucking her is a lucky dude.
>>216043496You might as well ask why chuds worship Sydney Sweeney yet never watch her movies. Conservatives cannot create or enjoy art, and have no other ambitions than scamming their followers and "owning the libs".
>>216043529this pic was making the rounds on twitter a couple weeks ago
>>216043516it was a daring meta-aware critique of my burning desire to screw his sister
>>216043568muh dik
>>216043563>Conservatives cannot create or enjoy art
>>216043568I think she's a rancid bitch nut I'd literally kill to have her ass on my face. Too bad she never shows it off anymore.
>>216043920Wasn't she in lady ballers with short shorts?
>>216043563Every art made pre-60s in conservative art you stupid faggot
>>216043568>tfw unless this is made, there will never be a realm where she is Snow White
>>216043496Well her (ex) bestie got her fired and replaced her so doubt they're making it now
>>216043516Thanks. Can't unsee now.
>some guy out there has had brett's ass bouncing on his pelvisfuuuuuck
>>216043845Be so kind as to explain the conservative political leanings of the comic book writer behind that panel, Grant Morrison
>>216043496Gamer posture.
>>216044095
>>216044153I accept your concession
>>216043568>>216043920I would lick her ass clean after a man nutted in it
>>216043496Probably because the movie production shtick was just a scheme to get a ton of money from certain investors, and then those reliable backers backed out.Now all of that money has dried up, and so now the Daily Wire is like, "We are done with all these meshuggas" and "This, I do not need" And meanwhile, the producers were having a schvitz.
>>216043954Yes, Picasso, Dali, Matisse, Dadaism, etc... were highly conservative. Or how about Manet who stunned with blatant nudes, Cezanne who was mocked by the french academy, Caravaggio who was hated by the catholic church, Michelangelo a flaming fag who painted lots of nudity that was covered up by the church. Or even Leonardo who was sued for not going by the convention.Tell me you don't know shit about art without saying you don't know shit about art.
>>216044521>Yes, Picasso, Dali, Matisse, Dadaism, etc... were highly conservativeThe online right was a mistake.
>>216044521
>>216043568Brapp Pooper
>>216043516Let's say, uh, hypothetically, you saw a comatose lady in a glass coffin.
>>216044521>Tell me X without saying XEvery time i read a zoomnigger express himself in this tired tiktok template and see no one call him out and put him in his place, I die a little inside.If you want to express yourself in tired madlibs templates why don't you post those animal meme pics?
>>216044521There are other right wing values besides "nudity bad".Art has historically been nationalistic, and promoting positive morals and family values. Sex is a part of life and celebrated in art. In the Bible, the song of solomon is downright pornographic. You don't need to be an openborders cuck to enjoy the female form.
>>216046148>Art has historically been nationalistic, and promoting positive morals and family values.Only in certain pockets. Art has always been used as propaganda to push certain ideals. Most of the famous celebrated artists that are known today pushed against those ideas. From Leonardo, to a certain extent Michelangelo, Parmigianino, Botticelli did later become more conservative to the point that he burnt his own paintings but his early work was a middle finger to conservative values of the time, the entire mannerist movement was all about breaking the rigorous rules of art, the 1800s is full of libertines and rebels, and the bottom half of the 1900s is nothing but a break from rules and values. Yes there have absolutely been artists that fit the "conservative" roles like Bouguerau, David, and the whole French academy, artists loved by the church, some pre-raphaelites, etc... but to say that all art pre 1960s is all conservative is a grossly massive retarded statement.
>>216043496it was never a real movie, it was just clickbait
>>216043496Release the Shapiro cut
>>216046585>even bigger manhands than ChloMo
>>216046328>to say that all art pre 1960s is all conservative is a grossly massive retarded statement.99% of artists would be disgusted by trannies reading to elementary school kids and infinite immigrants coming into their countries. Whether or not they give a fuck about obamacare, weed, nafta, or even promiscuity, is not really what anyone was arguing itt.
>>216046328>>216047071In other words THEY'D BE "CONSERVATIVE" BY TODAY'S STANDARDS.
>>216047071>99% of artists would be disgusted by trannies reading to elementary school kids and infinite immigrants coming into their countries.Politics is all relative. If this is your definition of "liberalism" than liberalism has only existed for 20 yrs. BTW tons of artist were flaming homos or were friends with flaming homos, dating all the way back to antiquity. Dali in particular loved trannies, Michelangelo is probably the biggest homo in all of art that even when he painted or sculpted women he used male models.
>>216045936Probably be weirded out and curious why there's a woman in a glass coffin
>ffw I see Brett's face and the words "pussy out"
>>216043529The dude is going raw, she's already pregnant
>>216047125>Politics is all relative. If this is your definition of "liberalism" than liberalism has only existed for 20 yrs.See >>216047084They may have been homos but I doubt most of them were trannies.Yes, by "liberal" i mean "contemporary liberal" because that's what is relevant on a board about contemporary movies with woke shit. The French revolution may have invented liberalism depending on who you ask, but they would right ...Why am i wasting time writing all this shit? You know exactly what you're doing. You're being disingenuous and I'm going to bed.
>>216043496>>216043568>>216043920>>216046585>>216047168shes cute when getting jewpilled
>>216047235>Yes, by "liberal" i mean "contemporary liberal"This is a retarded convo. If by liberalism you mean what has been happening in the last 10 years then yes "le all art is consevartive". Would modern conservatives accept all artist as part of the "trad" movement? Lol nope. Going all the way back to Leonardo he was highly critical of the church, he practiced vegeteranism, in his notebooks he wrote that he wished that the killing of animals would one day be seen as bad as the killing of humans, he would buy birds just to set them free, and once again he was a flaming homo, he also flirted with enviromentalism. So don't pretend you would be a cheerleader for him, would he be alive today. You would call him a woke leftard no more different than Greta.
>>216047399And that's someone who lived 5 centuries ago
>>216043496They already got the publicity. It's a waste of money to actually make the movie
>>216043529Her face is too Jewish looking like Ben hard pass
>>216046082The phrase predates zoomers by a few years.
>>216043496Is she Jewish?
>>216047773No she's a WASP turned Catholic
>>216047179She's already pregnant again?
not sufficiently jewish enough
>>216043563You're getting mad at the things you invented in your head again..
