It does NOT stand the test of time.
A review can't "age poorly" or "not stand the test of time". Either it was good when it came out or it wasn't
>>216045471I rewatch it several times a year. Still hits the spot
>palpatine: do evil things>aliens: durrr okay!Here's your deep intelligent political movie bro.
>>216045471>axewound starts rotting about a video from 24 years ago
>>216045471https://youtu.be/oKm4ueVuxpY
>>216045471They were wrong then and they're wrong now. The prequels are beloved by everyone that matters.
>>216045631No they aren't, who the fuck are you talking about?
>>216045712>If I keep saying it, it'll become trueNope, go back to your Reddit overlords
>>216045735
>>216045471The prequels suck, get over it
There was a real sense of almost literal disbelief about how bad those movies were.
>>216045766>>216045768>>216045895Mike!
>>216045471The prequels suck but in a good way, especially now that they're older and everyone who watched them as kids has a sweet spot. RLM just had pure hatred which has aged badly because its fucking star wars who cares
>>216045735WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOUR FORESKIN?
>>216045712>>216045631prequels were great. A bunch of retarded kids born in the 90s btfo the 1970s orig hippy-dippy SW fans. Sorry bud
>>216045768It is only boomers and gen x grandpa fags who hate the prequels
>>216046408>>216046499
>>216045471Star wars was shit when it released too, it never stood anywhere.
>>216045601For me? It's the TNG movie reviews.
>>216045471The funny thing is people either liking or at worst being lukewarm on the prequels is reflected in these videos. The ROTS video opens with Mike telling all the people who said they liked ROTS that they were actually wrong. And I forget which one it was but the one where he kidnaps the girl he asks her about the prequels she says something along the lines as "yeah I remember them, they were okay, kinda bad."
>>216045471It remains an eternal gleaming diamond in a shit sea of zoomer opinions.
>>216046568same
>>216045471>Plinkett's review doesn't stand the test of timecorrectpeople wised up to his flimsy arguments and surface level critique
>>216045631Everything you just said is wrong. (I’m quoting even more ‘Star War” trash)
>>216045471 nope
i remember, when i was a kid, trying to watch SW(prequels) and giving up after like half an hour because it was so boring, despite it being a movie for kids as prequel fans put it
>>216045471The real highlights of their channel will always be their Jack and Jill review and their reappraisal of Freddie Got Fingered. That's the most lucid that they had ever gotten. The Plinkett stuff is Nostalgia Critic tier work, albeit with funnier skits.
>>216045471First episode was very good.
>>216045471I loved it, and I loved all the fun shit that was attached to it. Og Star Wars boomers can fuck off.
I enjoy the prequels and I enjoy the plinkett reviews
Plinkett is stupid af
>>216046568
>>216045471Like Marx, who correctly identified the problems with Capitalism, so did RLM correctly identify the problems with the Prequel films. Yet also were both their so-called solutions far worse than the original flaws they were meant to address. This is clearly evident in both the travesties of communism and Disney's sequel trilogy. And for that, I will never forgive them.
>>216045603nooo, you're supposed to focus on the events and characters, not the ideas driving them thats reddit
>>216047258Yeah never understood the praise for abrams in any capacity. He makes shit movies and always has.
>>216048622saying abrams should do star wars is a condemnation of his star trek moviesno one ever said or thought disney should control star wars
>>216045766
