>Your bird may have blinded the basilisk, but it can still HEAR YOU!
>>216048201>HEARWasn't it "smell"? Snakes don't have good eyesight or hearing but they smell with their tongues flicking in the air I believe.
Is John Cena Tom Riddle now
>>216048201Why Dumbledore himself didn't come to help Harry?
>>216048271made me giggle
>>216048247Laughably bad biology aside, this excuse for a "climatic action scene" is poor payoff for anyone stuck sitting through the second installment in the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.>a-at least the books were good though"No!"The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>>216048201One of the DVD extra menus stated that it could smell human flesh, Wouldn't harry be fucked anyway if it could?
>>216048328i missed this classic. it even has "clifford for president"
>>216048201Breeding basilisks is incredibly easy in Potter books, you just need a hen and a toad while irl the egg needs to be laid by a rooster.
>>216048328Atlas Shrugged is horrid
>>216048328>ayn rand anon pls
>>216049042>>216049311it's ancient pasta
>>216048328> atlas shrugged and tolstoyevsky slop at top tierahahahahahaha
>>216049383newfag
>>216048328out of these 35 books I've read:god: 0high: 2mid: 0low: 1shit: 3
>>216049042>>216049311>>216049383That pasta and that image are most likely older than any of (You).
