>Modern cartoons are woke propaganda! I will only let my kids watch old cartoons!Meanwhile old cartoons:>Sharing is caring!>Don’t judge a book by its cover!>Multiculturalism is cool!
>>216049502The difference is that OP's pic is true diversity. Modern diversity only counts if the majority of people are brown enough because apparently brown = diverse.
>>216049571>Modern white genocide is too much! We need a little bit of white genocide!
>>21604950290s cartoons were far more diverse in terms of disability representation compared to modern slop, which is either brown people or gays.
>>216049588how many children cartoons have gay people in them?
>>216049502Letting kids watch cartoons instead of movies is stupid either way.
>>216049587>hey arnold is white genocidejust kys /pol/yp
>>216049502/tv/ was young when they watched these cartoons so it didn’t bother back in the day. It’s just childhood nostalgia clouding them, every other answer is just cope
>>216049587Cuntfucking retard, where do you see white genocide in Hey Arnold? This better be bait
back in the 90s we could all agree that racism is bad before the internet broke everyone's mind
>>216049606you'd be surprised.
>>216049693back in the 90s blacks weren't chimping out about reparations and representation
I can't believe Hey Arnold is set in the Pacific Northwest, like Seattle or Portland. I always thought he lived in NYC.
>>216049753We had shit like the LA riots in the 90s, zoomie.
>>216049771was that about reparations or representation?
>>216049771rooftop koreans did what the white man wouldnt...
>>216049735wow something that could be a tame gay kiss (or just a mannish tomboy) in the background for a second in one episodethe west truly has fallen
>>216049789You're the one who asked, bro
>>216049782it was about black people being awful to asians, that's for sure. an intriguing contrast to gerald and phoebe
>>216049782yes, people were talking about represenation and tokenization, etc. in the 90sand talk about reparations started in like the 70s
>>216049753>back in the 90s blacks weren't chimping out zoomer retard
>>216049502>I will only let my kids watch old cartoons!Says no one. Unless they mean Looney Tunes and Ben and Jerry.
>>216049502I'm not a /pol/tard, so i don't care if non-white people get more represenatation, infact I support it. But there is a difference here. The shows in the 90s were pandering to ethnic minorities. They said, non-white people watch our show, so it would nice (and probably increase ratings) if we included them in our shows. Being aware of how non white people are generally represented on tv, aknowledging your ability to change that, and doing something about it, this was being woke. Modern "woke" is disney pandering to the white liberals that think disney should shoe horn non white people into anything at any possibility. Instead of letting non white people make shows about non white stuff.
>>216049502>mostly white kids in a way generally reflective of demographics>prosocial messaging>no gay shitI fail to see the problem.
>>216049811>yesNope. LA chimpouts were not about reparations
>>216049825Do you need glasses to read the complete sentence, you presbyopic tard?
>>216050189>>216050201What difference does it make?
>>216049789>erm actually this is normal
>>216049753Oh definitely not bro, in the 90s? Everything was hunky dory
>>21604950290s liberalism>treat everyone the same! share things equally!2020's liberalism>white people are fundamentally evil and don't deserve anything
>>216050851Both are the same slippery slope, one is at the bottom the other is at the middle
