>>216057243
the fight choreography is very good in these movies, you dont know what youre talking about

>>216057264

The Bourne trilogy trashed modern fight choreography by making everyone think shaky cam and rapid-fire cuts were a substitute for real technique, and James Bond stupidly followed along. Before this nonsense, guys like Jackie Chan, Jean Claude Van Damme, and even Steven Seagal could hold a wide shot and just do the fight because they actually had the physical skill to make choreography entertaining. You could see the strikes, the reactions, the rhythm, the geography. Bourne shows up, shakes the camera like its being chased by bees, and suddenly whole franchises are hiding behind visual noise instead of showing real movement. Jackie Chan built entire set pieces around clarity and timing. Van Damme let you see every kick. Seagal could dismantle six guys in a single shot. Bourne replaced all that with confusion, and Hollywood spent years mistaking blurriness for realism.

I'm not sure any other action movies have done the shakycam thing in a way that's comparable to these. At least not ones with similarly big budgets.
Maybe the Bourne movies were criticized for that enough to rein in the influence it could have had

File: ancient chinese gun-fu.webm (2.95 MB, 720x404)

2.95 MB WEBM

>>216057264
no