[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1000013698.jpg (473 KB, 1080x803)
473 KB
473 KB JPG
Idiocracy was a documentary
>>
File: 1759113254874104.png (95 KB, 244x420)
95 KB
95 KB PNG
how come guys who have long hair since their early 20s are rarely balding after 30? Pretty much all the 90s metalheads and old rockers still have their hair in old age. How is that? am I just cherrypicking?
>>
of all the trends co-opted by normalfags, i find "x" maxxing to be the most annoying
>>
>>216152211
I like to use it ironically. Like yesterday I was at my buddy's place and I had to take a shit so afterwards I told him I was shitmaxxing. He knew this was a joke, but sometimes you say stuff like this and people don't know it's a joke so they ask you what that means and you give them some elaborate fake explanation which they always believe because nowadays everyone's retarded
>>
>>216152255
>I like to use it ironically.
thats how its supposed to be used but retards like in the OP are absolutely not joking at all when they use it and its just sad. they get irony poisoned so easily and severely
>>
>29 views

Yeah this is advertising.....
>>
>>216151870
they didn't tell you?
>>
>>216151870
the owner of the store treated me to this hair
>>
>>216151870
I have a theory that hair, especially thick hair, covers the scalp and protects it from sunlight which will damage it. Essentially the more buzz cuts you get the more damage you'll do to your hair over time.
>>
>>216152255
Ropemaxxing made me laugh the other day on youtube.
>>
He's right though.
>>
>>216151870
body is wasting energy to produce hair all the time and bloke heads be like
>long hair are fucking gay, time to cut it
body responds
>fine no more hair than asshole
>>
>>216151780
White men are the dumbest race on the planet
>>
>>216151780
Idiocracy was a horrible unfunny film
I genuinely don't understand how anyone can praise it after actually having seen that mess
>>
>>216151870
If you don't have long hair your family's hair will be executed
>>
>Corinthians 11:14
>Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
>>
>>216151870
Selection bias. You consider all metalheads who still have long hair after their 30s, and not the ones who shave it off because having long hair only at the back of your head looks retarded
>>
>>216154852
God's teachings come in the form of passive-aggressive questions? You can just answer that question with "no"
>>
modern science is a censored corporate leftists religion in itself so yes its retarded
>>
>>216154898
No, Paul is objectively correct here.
Longer hair is less practical and harder to keep completely clean and more susceptible to things like lice.
That's nature's way of telling you that long hair is for gay hippies.
>>
>>216154925
>Paul is objectively correct here
So why didn't he say "nature teaches you long hair on men is shameful"?
You saying you agree with him does not make it objective. He asked a question.
>>
>>216154852
>child sacrifice good
>long hair bad
>>
>>216154925
Or people with hygiene standards
>>
>>216154898
kek
>>
>>216154925
ask me how I know you're circumcised, faggot
>>
Honestly I'm not shitposting about the Bible or anything, I just thought it's God's word and not "this is (literal) gospel because some dude Paul said so". Isn't it blasphemous for Christians to accept a prophet other than Christ?
>>
>>216154975
Do you not know who Paul is?
>>
>>216154975
as a christian you can commit genocide on 7 billion people and ask for forgiveness and you will go to heaven
>>
>>216154994
I think he's one of the apostles. But again, that section anon quoted isn't Paul saying "Christ said long hair is icky", it's Paul saying "yo long hair in nature is shameful too, right?" so it's taking his word as law
>>
>>216154852
long as ass long not shoulders long
>>
>>216155008
He is the most important apostle, the one who spread Christianity in the early days after the Lords' ascension.
Literally the reason we have Christianity and know of Jesus' teachings.
>>
>>216155050
When did Jesus (not some guy named Paul who said it's true in nature) say long hair is forbidden?
Remember that you are an apostate if you take someone other than Jesus's word as law
>>
>>216151780
How can these people go through life saying shit like this?
>>
>>216151870
it was once in a lifetime. you will never see it again.
>>
>>216155060
We don't have Jesus' direct words on anything.
We only know what his disciples wrote down and taught.
>>
>>216154925
We have running water now.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.