>>216497805
How do you interpret the ending

>>216497964
/tv/ hasn't told me what to make of it yet unironically

>>216497805
Go ask Rob Ager. I just think every scene is aesthetically pleasing and perfectly framed. I'm not going to overthink it.

i remember watching this movie back in 2003. I was chewing on a bunch of morning glory seeds. Luckily I didnt puke. Anyway. I started to slightly trip and got totally locked in to the movie. it was fucking awesome.
As far as the ending? Complete and utter nihilism

>>216498074
I thought so too. I enjoyed watching it. They even kept the intermission in so I could take a piss and be comfy.
>>216498084
My experience was very similar to that.
It was very interesting for me to keep in mind that it was made in 1968 and to contrast that with the present day.
The person I was with was also seeing it for their first time and commented how surprised they were by the visuals and that it looked very modern.

>>216497805
you thought it was a boring and pretentious anthology with no direction or message

File: Heading-4.png (659 KB, 1110x740)

659 KB PNG

>I gotta keep... my... e-eyes ope-

this movie is good with weed or alcohol, it makes your brain in the right pace.
if you didn't get it you should read the book, it's nice

>>216497805
The HAL 9000 part is only part worth watching

>>216497805
you thought it was retarded and that Solaris was better

>>216497805
You thought it was pure cinema.

I need to watch it again.

>>216499580
DUDE