It stood almost 20 feet tall, was longer than a school bus from snout to tail and weighed 10 metric tonnes, with a 50,000 N bite force
>>216526513I think they're pretty fucking cool. Imagine seeing one of those bad boys in the flesh, face to face. Those things will tear you to fucking shreds.
>>216526513>50,000 N bite forcethat's a lot of Ns
big chickden
>>216526539honestly it would probably leave you alone unless you are the only option
I would like to watch television or maybe a film with a T-Rex
>>216526650I've seen the documentary Jurassic Park, but go off TRDF.
What would it taste like, that's the question
>>216526513Too bad Trex can't act. Otherwise, I would...
>>216526513Had feathers and made cooing noises
>>216526714Probably horrendously tough and hard to chew. Idk on taste though.
>>216526513Please post scientifically accurate depictions of dinosaurs. They are supposed to have feathers.
I think he's neat.
>>216526513I had a t rex toy, it was large, and a terrorizer of lego
>>216527002>Please post scientifically accurate depictions of dinosaurs. They are supposed to have feathers.
Dinosaurs did NOT have feathers.They are lying to you to ruin how cool dinosaurs are.
>>216526513They should have grown forepaws, but they didn't call out to their totem enough, it was their fatal mistake.
>>216528251>Dinosaurs did NOT have feathers.Archaeology has only bones. Bones are not enough to claim dinosaurs had feathers, or dinosaurs did not have feathers, bones are not enough basis for such conclusions. Archaeology and paleontology do not know whether dinosaurs had feathers or not.
Reminder that there is a specimen called COPE REX and it's bigger than Giganotosaurus. I swear that we're living in a simulation.
>>216526659how do you get one in your living room and what kind of movies would it like to watch?
>>216528609>watch dinosaur movie with Rex>having to listen to another rant about "anti-carnivore" propaganda
