The first movie has a good story and sets up the characters very well, but the second movie benefits from the characters already being set up and just rolling with an established cast to make a fun movie that's more generally entertaining than the first
>>216527181This is genuinely one of the best-looking movies of the 80s and it’s just a mediocre comedy. Tony Scott made this shit look immaculate
>>216527266The wrong Scott died
>>216527266I noticed that too. The cinematography was very noticeably better than the first.
>>216527181they had to introduce a completely unnecessary secondary antagonist to explain why Crockett and Tubbs didn't carry over from the first movie
>>2165271811 > 3 >>>> 2
>>2165277772 is better than 1 and I haven't seen 3
>>216527777>look ma! I'm being contrarian!>...but not like overtly, I still put the first as #1 as not to be too overt!Well, got the (you) anyway I guess...
>>216528165>>216528185malding
>>2165271811>2>32 is still good, but it's jsut the 1st one, but bigger and dumber
I see everybody forgot about Beverly Hills Cop 4.
>>216528469>Netflix exclusiveI will never watch it.
>>216528515You aren't missing out.
