►Current Round:As of this post, the Quarterfinals have begun! Next round will be posted ITT once Quarterfinals have concluded.►Vote: https://forms.gle/d2s1yj3BzcuJwcgC7►Timer: https://www.tickcounter.com/countdown/8934928/quarterfinals-of-the-god-emperor-of-tvkind-tournament-end-in►Current Eligible Entrants—Characters taken from threads >>216633520 and >>216612763 using the following criteria:>Characters must originate from a live action TV show or movie>Characters must not be bannable (i.e. no GR15 rule violations)>Real-life actors are not allowed. You must only submit the characters they play.>Characters have to be 18 and over>Cannot nominate multiple characters in one post>Generalization Statute: You are nominating and voting for the entire history of that character posted, not just one particular iteration.►Host>Anonymous►Round 1 Results: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScB6exT_mbZevAgMeoZtEwJJxA6FdURR99EKi8oL65-cPousw/viewanalytics►Round 2 Results: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfWftJOSYsHJLrseR8LF87DAEVHI4coyyyrZ0S155e6jzIaRw/viewanalytics►Round 3 Results: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdher248P9201wBTFAZhs-GC-D_B8o07MfpH84JYOoPqvh1SQ/viewanalytics►Previous Thread: >>216710893
>>216724313OC Anchor
>bro really thinks anyone gives a shit
>Officer K>Chosen One>Tony Soprano>Johnny
>>216724822Mr. President...
>>216724822>K>Bane>Tony>Johnny
>>216724822>George>Bane>Tony>Johnny
crashing this tournament
>>216726160WITH NO SURVIVORS
>>216724313A lotta pulp for a full breakfast!
>>216724542>I simply MUST rush into this thread to announce my lack of interest in this thread
>>216726804ishygddt
>>216724313Mr. Soprano, I'm Tropicana
>>216724313what, no Bateman?
CIA vs Bane finale was written in the stars.
>>216727959Removed while trimming the potential roster from 84 to 64 because:>Characters must originate from a live action TV show or movieIgnore the fact that Bane is in the bracket; my retarded ass didn't catch him.
>>216728061>>Characters must originate from a live action TV show or movieThat's dumb. Adaptations are a central part of TV and film, this isn't like a licensed video game of a film release. Friggin Gone With The Wind is a book adaptation.
>>216728061>spoilerFrankly this rule should be more lenient. Tons of TV/movie adaptations are far more well known than the original source.
>>216728061yeah we gotta dump that rule, that genuinely knocks out like 50% of significant film and TV
>>216728183>>216728189>>216728220I actually agree, these original rules are much too strict. We'll need to work out something better for next year.
>>216728292It seems mainly just copypasted from /co/ but with the age one added. Those rules make sense for /co/ but not for /tv/. The adaptation one has to go and we don't need the generalization one either.
>>216724313>K>Bane>CIA>MacReady
>>216729269
>>21672431350 minutes to go...
>>216724313CIA has this in the bag.
>>21673091530 minutes...
STOP THE COUNT
>>216724313Results of Quarterfinals round:https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf3-MWTpN978rHNwz64H6Vlk_NKBlZopFLFRCnPuz74gsDSPA/viewanalyticsNow for the Semifinals round!►Vote: https://forms.gle/YJVk575PRQXanjdp9►Timer: https://www.tickcounter.com/countdown/8942290/semifinals-of-the-god-emperor-of-tvkind-tournament-end-in
>>216731970ALL IN on bane and CIA.
>>216731970>Bane>CIA>Tony>George>Chosen One>MacReady
>>216731970Oh hi Mark
>>216731970The ultimate clash
>>216731970>>216732463I wonder if Johnny is secretly the Thing.
>>216731970BaneCIATonyGeorgeMacReadyChosen One
>>216731970Let's do this
>>216731970>up against the big guy
>>216724313That is the sound of inevitability
>>216732526What is this Thing, you are crazy.
>>216724542retard
What will your god emperor do upon being elected?
>>216735562Be in charge here
Your father never had the makings of a semi-finalist.
>>216724313I’ve been asking for a king of /tv/ tournament on /v/ do years and I’m just now seeing this. What did I miss?
>>216735745not much desuhaven't been pruned yet which is good but it's slow going
>>216735745Someone "started" one as a troll, others just took it up anyway. Might as well stop waiting for someone to make one and just go with it.
>>216735745>>216735845More specifically, someone's been going around different boards, pretending to start Mr. /co/ and King of /v/ style events, and never following up with that. This time, I figured, fuck it, might as well get this going if he clearly won't.
>>216735882>pretends to start one as a troll>inadvertently leads to one being started for realI hope he looks back in five years with regret and anguish.
>>216735745Consider it something of a prototype. We can do more of a proper build next time. Including alerting mods to it being made and having some announcement before nominations rather than dropping out of nowhere.
I did not tell them anything, it's not true, it's bullshit, I did not tell them, I did NOT.
>>216735774>>216735940I noticed that the first couple of threads didn’t have too many posts which is why I probably didn’t notice it. There’s lots of characters I wish I could have nominated. I guess I’m glad there’s finally a tournament. The only result I’m really surprised by is that Darth maul beat Rust by so much.
>>216736079at this level votes count for a lot, you can get a blowout with only a few
>>216735745at least the E8 of this inaugural one is about what it should be (barring the lack of Bateman)
>>216728183>>216728220>>216728292Yeah you can’t have a king of /tv/ tournament with a rule that leaves out Bane, Driver, and Patrick Bateman. As long as it’s a fictional character it shouldn’t matter. Also, the character should be based on whichever film they’re from instead of including every iteration of them. The different jokers for example should be considered different characters.
>>216736130I'm surprised Johnny got that far.
>>216736190Very much so, especially when a lot of adaptations hugely alter the source material, including a lot of great ones. It can simply be made clear you are nominating the character from the film/TV show, not the source material. So you can nominate a character from Game of Thrones, but not from A Song of Ice and Fire (No Darkstar for /got/, I'm afraid). That seems really obvious, but I think it's an important distinction to make anyway.
>>216736230Johnny is a wonderful person.
>>216736190Now to bring up another can of worms, biopics of real people. It would be easy to just bar them, but that knocks out films like Amadeus. But we don't really need "I nominate current divisive figure from recent movie" shitting up the place. So maybe no biopics of living people? Or no biopics of politicians.
>>216731970Investing in Officer K.
>Was getting caught part of your plan?>Of course! Johnny refused our offer in favor of yours, we had to find out what he told you.>You just a big chicken, CHEEP CHEEP CHEEP CHEEP
>>216736130we just couldn't...get dubs
>>216724313is that the official title we're going with?
>>216736936Nah, feel free to come up with a better one for next time.
>>216736961SHOGUN
>>216736936Same. /his/ already has the Emperor title. /tv/ should be something like /tv/.I.P
>>216736961Chairman and Chairwoman
>>216736961I would say President or CEO but there's no room for a gender one if we ever do get a female one.
>>216736961Master of /tv/
>>216736978Buff and Muff
>>216736994President and First Lady of /tv/.
Can I post my OC here?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tq8GlMT-Vgk
>>216736978I like this one.
>>216736936Would Big Guy be a little on the nose?
>Spiderman won for Marvel in /co/>there's a chance Bane wins for DC in /tv/
>>216736936Kino Commander and Clit-Kino Commander of /tv/
>>216737081Sure, I'll go ahead and anchor>>216724331
>>216737081
>>216737084Chairwoman's kinda long though and doesn't hold the weight of a title like Queen.
>>216737003Master and Mistress?
>>216737081I'm masturbating to this
>>216737003>>216737123Master of /tv/Commander of /tv/ (the clit is silent)
>>216737081You can if you believe you can.
>>216737081>"do not steal oc">anon clearly stole the ocOutrageous, anon. Outrageous.
>>216737003I like Master of /tv/, it works.
>>216736378I just think that’s it’s better to just bar real people or else you’re going to have people voting for Hitler because of Downfall.
>>216737386Hitler's a politician. No biopics of politicians sorts that. It's not as though we would be inundated with them. But a few really notable or loved ones on /tv/ ought to be eligible.
>>216736961My suggestion is to include a poll of various suggested options in with the voting form and let it be voted on at the same time.
>>216736190>>216736378just throwing out dartboard suggestions on rulesHard ban on biopics, unless it's a fictional films in that style like Dewy Cox. Weird Al would need to be a discussion on if he is valid.1 Depiction per Tourney, 2 Characters per series."Joker" is one nomination, perhaps the nomination picture determines which Joker. As for 2 characters per series, sticking with the DC example does TDK Joker take away a slot from Gunnverse? Are they considered separate? They'd have to be so it's not flooded with DC/Marvel. I just wrote out the 1 depiction thing but I think as part of nominations it should specify which film is being nominated. Bale's Patrick Bateman is going to be a heavy hitter, but we have the upcoming Luca Guadagnino American Psycho movie, sticking to exclusively one depiction of the character for the length of the tourney keeps things healthy.
>>216737509I think these things can come in votes as well, just include some polls with options, let people decide what they prefer. Like the biopic question, a poll of>No biopics >Biopics allowed with no living subjects>Biopics allowed with no politicians>Biopics allowedEtc. Just because a lot of them are so heavily fictionalized, either on purpose like Amadeus or Ed Wood, or just because they didn't care about accuracy that much like Braveheart.As for the series thing, I don't think it's that big a deal immediately, while there's some big series like Star Wars or MCU that have a lot of characters and movies/shows, I think they would get weeded out pretty easily in a potential qualifier, which we didn't have this time but might in the future. Even in this one, while the nominations were shaky, we were hardly inundated with franchise characters. We can do without a limit for now. If it looks like a problem later there can be a vote on that too.
Bateman.
>>216737743GET OFF THE INTERNET, BATTLER.
>>216737743That's not Bateman, that's a loser. Bateman is a winner.
>>216737476yup yup, just collecting some possibilities from the thread and elsewhere>God Emperor (as it is now)>God & Goddess>King & Queen (used currently on /v/)>Emperor and Empress (used currently on /his/)>Mr. & Mrs. (used currently on /co/)>Lord & Lady>Chairman & Chairwoman>Master & Mistress>Big Guy & Big Girl>Tsar & Tsarina>Chief/Chieftain & Chieftess>Count & Countess>Duke and Duchessand some that are non gendered for now, figure something out for females later if it happens>Commander>President>Captain>General>Kaiser>Mogul>CEO>VIP>Pope>Shogun>Sultan
>>216737889I think Big Guy & Big Girl would make sense for /tv/ because of Bane memes.
>>216737889Big Gal, rather than girl
>>216737858>>216737861Patrick Ushiromiya or Battler Bateman?
>>216737942>>216737929You're right, Big Guy and Big Gal.
>>216737954American Psycho: A Visual Novel
>>216737929>>216737942>>216737968co-signing on this t. random guy
>>216737889>First one to get votes gets to stay on my aircraft!
>>216737929It's incredibly dumb but it's also incredibly /tv/ so I'm with it
>>216737889I don't mind Lord actually, it still sounds very grand and it's associated with a lot of fiction in a way other titles aren't.
>>216737509I don’t remember the exact number but in the king of /v/ tournament there’s like 5-6 characters allowed per franchise. I don’t really think that it would be that much of an issue because most of the qualifiers would be meme pics like Bateman or Driver anyway not marvel characters. I think however that each depiction of a character should count as a different nomination. I don’t see why the Heath Ledger joker and the Phoenix joker shouldn’t be considered different characters.
>>216738108true, how many duplicates are REALLY gonna qualify? we're not going to have a dozen Marvel characters here
>>216737889I’d propose Star of /tv/ as well but I’m not sure how that’d work for feminine title.
>>216738157Starlet?
>>216737889Director of /tv/
>>216738167Sounds good, starlet, starlight, etc.
>>216738172Embarrassed I didn't think of that.
>>216738136I means as far as capeshit goes it's just going to be some Nolan Batman characters who get a lot of attention, thanks to Baneposting, bankposting, etc.
>>216738136Marvel isn't as much of an issue with dupes, but have 6 Jokers, 6 Batmans, 4 Supermans, etc is a concern. I'm not entirely opposed to letting Heath and Phoenix as two separate noms but I'm happy to lose it too side step Jokers running circles in each of their brackets.
>>216738298I don't see that many actually qualifying if you have enough nominations to need a qualifying round. Heath Joker, sure, but how many more incarnations will actually beat out 128 (or 64) other names in vote totals?I guess you could put a limit on adaptations of the same character if it's a problem, but I say only do that if it IS a problem, if it's sorting itself out, no need for a fix.
>>216738364I'm only concerned as I think it could easily snowball, at least with JokerAssuming no rules in place- Heath is a lock- Phoenix is a extremely likely lock- Jared Leto I genuinely think would make it to R1 just so people can vote him out like Banjo on /v/- Now you have 3 jokers, might as well support Nicholson and Cesar Romero to complete the set.I get what you're saying and I do agree, these kinds of things don't need more rules if they sort themselves out, but I also believe we'll get 3 Jokers comfortably.
>>216738543It's possible. But I say let it play out and if a problem arises, it can be addressed. Maybe a poll question on whether to have limits on adaptations of the same character.
>>216738543>>216738364Definitely needs to be a series limit in place to prevent that from happening, like 3 at most.
>>216738920I don't agree, I think it's putting the cart ahead of the horse. Fewer rules with rules added as they become necessary is better, /tv/ is its own board and TV & film its own media, copying rules from /v/ or /co/ just for the sake of it isn't needed. Even though there are TV and film franchises, there's not that many that would actually yield a large amount of characters that can get through a tourney vote. You could nominate twelve characters from NCIS but I don't think they'd get the votes.
The best sign thus far has been we have not been pruned, despite not clearing it with mods in advance. So there's not instant hostility towards it. Maybe if it were more bustling that would change but it's a good sign regardless.
>>216724313What do they win?
>>216737889I...Skeletor, will be Master of /tv/!
>>216739700They get...NOTHING
>>216739700They can stave off the inevitability of decay for one day
>>216739200>shitposting might of finally made /tv/ourney happen truly the most /tv/ way it could start
Other than Bateman, who are you hoping to see next time?>Mr. Roarke>Columbo>House
>>216736378What about iconic tv hosts? Could we vote on the rule if people like Steve Irwin or chris hansen would be allowed? Also we might need to debate on the animation rule. It means people can't enter characters like Godzilla in depending on how strict the rule is because Godzilla could be argued to be puppetry.
>>216739700A carton of cigarettes
>>216741614I think puppetry should just be allowed, it's live action, straight up.
>>216741614animation is covered by /co/ but Puppets gotta be included on /tv/
>>216741861>>216741736Agreed, stuff like the Muppets interacts with real people and actors as a basic part of their shows/films, and are performed on camera by actors. On a related note, there's stuff like animation and live action hybrids, like Who Framed Roger Rabbit, to consider.
>>216737889For the host, if you do include a poll of all the name suggestions in the next round, could you allow voting on multiple choices? I'm happy with four or five of the suggestions in the thread, I'm not married to a single choice.
>>216737889>>216738157Thought about it some more and I'm starting to really like Star of /tv/. It's a word that's intrinsically associated with film and TV production and it's unique from other tourney names while still sounding grand.
>>216742090Jessica Rabbit has been appearing in Ms. /co/ since it's inception, so Rodger would be counted as /co/.
>>216742266Also it would have a natural choice for organising winners (like Mr. /co/ joins a pantheon of/co/lympus), a /tv/ Walk of Fame, featuring each new Star Or constellations if you want to keep it mythic. Or both
>>216724331>Hi Dr. Pavel, these are for you. You look really sexy today, Dr. Pavel. I didn't get my promotion. That son of a bitch told me that I would get it within three months. I saved them bundles. They're crazy. I don't think I will ever get it. They betrayed me. They didn't keep their promise. They tricked me, and I don't care anymore. They already put my ideas into practice. The bank saves money, and they are using me. And I am the fool. >He wasn't alone>Here you go, keep the change.>Don't worry, no charge for them.>Nice to see you. I'm going to take a nap.>They work for the mercenary. The masked man?>Whatever. I don't care. Bye-bye now.>......
>>216744249AHAHAA haven't laughed this good in a while
>>216742592I don't know why that was deleted of all posts but It doesn't really matter if she is, Who Framed Roger Rabbit is a seminal film, excluding central characters doesn't seem right. I think hybrid films of live action mixed with animation (CG or 2D) can just be counted as live action. Otherwise, how would you handle CG characters like Gollum?
>>216744249>Johnny appearing in TDKR and rambling non sequiturs instead of responding to anyoneIt can work
Everybody betray me, I fed up with dis BOARD.
>>216724313
>>216737095>>216737968>>216737929Suggestion for Big Guy, rather than it be the title of the tournament, have it be the name of the trophy the winner gets. Like the Academy Award statue is called the Oscar, we have the Big Guy.
>>216724313Is Robert eligible for this?
>>216747956I don’t think that stock photos count as /tv/ unfortunately.
>>216748166Ok what about stuff like the Nostalgia Critic? He did make actual feature length films like Kickassia featuring him as the protagonist.
>>216748166A whitelist for certain characters that's voted on would be nice. I don't want to pressure OP though.
>>216748202frankly it meets the criteria so I don't see why not, as long as it's nominated from the film
>>216748202Works for me, Isn't Nostalgia Critic considered a series of its own?
>>216749092It's a web review series, I don't know if that really counts as a "show". But as pointed out, the Channel Awesome specials are feature films, cheap as they are, so it's a moot point.
>>216724313>no dale cooper in any of thisyou didn't even remotely try. pathetic
>>216749559Who is "you"? Anons are the ones who nominate. Why didn't you nominate him?
>>216748202kino
>>216724313>>2167319703 hours left of Semifinals...
>>216749559Nominations were marred by the initial poster not being serious about it, another person just took up the mantle properly from there. So we missed a few people.
It's time.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pd1YVxFUJc&pp=ygULYmFuZSB2cyBjaWHSBwkJTwoBhyohjO8%3D
>>216750259Year of the Spoony?
>>216748202>>216749035>>216749403He's still supposed to be a character played by an actor so I'd say it's fair game, it's like saying Pee-Wee Herman shouldn't compete in these.
>>216748202>>216748203I think that as long as it’s a fictional character that’s appeared in a movie it’s fine. There’s no point in over complicating things.
>>216737743KILL BATTLERDESTROY BATTLERDEFENESTRATE BATTLERFLAY BATTLERPUNCH BATTLERIMMOLATE BATTLERIMPALE BATTLER
>>216724313>>216731970Results of Semifinals round:https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe_eDBdUta4kawwecq8w0hvgcdM1M4TWGcgnnjIDHy78YTKog/viewanalyticsAnd now...FOR THE FINALS:►Vote: https://forms.gle/k2g8gqSaoz51Txvi8►Timer: https://www.tickcounter.com/countdown/8947330/final-round-of-the-god-emperor-of-tvkind-tournament-ends-inSome questions about future tournaments can be found at the end.
>>216754408>bane vs CIA finalI’m not surprised at all. There’s over three times as many votes as the last round so I think that this tournament might actually do well next year.
>>216754408And let's calculate our 5th-8th place winners:5th: Tony Soprano (The Sopranos) - 258 points6th: George Costanza (Seinfeld) - 227 points7th: The Chosen One (Kung Pow: Enter the Fist) - 187 points8th: R. J. MacReady (The Thing) - 178 points(5th place votes are each worth 4 points, 6th votes are worth 3 points, 7th votes are worth 2, and 8th votes are only worth 1 point.)
>>216754408The wording of the question kind of implies that the actor playing someone is getting nominated. Regardless, I think that there should just be a blanket ban on nonfictional characters.
>>216754606Thanks for catching that. I'll adjust the wording.
>>216754408Regardless if there’s a limit on how many portrayals a character can have, I still think that each portrayal should count as a separate nomination. I don’t think that the /v/ rule of all versions of a character counting for one nomination would work here.
>>216754408Vote totals are up, that's good. Absolutely no surprise to see Bane v CIA finale
>>216754408....I wanted this and now I don't know who to vote for. CIA is kind of the face of the meme but it's called BANEposting.
>>216754408Are we not having a poll option for a tourney name then?
I'm surprised the tourney actually managed to get to finals, I thought it was DOA lmaoare we really going to have these right next to Ko/v/? for such a big board 4U I think they should start on January or something, plus we barely had traction at the start so I'm not sure if the finalist or the E8 should get booted, what do you guys think?
>>2167553202026 should definitely have a different month. Could be early in the year, so it's close to Oscar season when there's a lot of interest in films, and while at the other end of the year technically, practically it's close to the two /v/ tourneys, but not right on top of them. January, February or March for instance. Two months if there's two tourneys.But I'm very ok with taking this as the official 2025 winner, I don't think it'd be fair to boot a winner or E8, we'd just have the 2025 and 2026 ones only a few months apart. And maybe we could squeeze in a female tournament before the end of December just to 2025 has two inaugural winners. It is all very haphazard but good films have come from absolute messes dozens of times, a more organized tourney can build on this too.
>>216755509>>216755320Honestly I think that’s it’s fine to have this tournament right after the /v/ one because the /co/ tournament is right before the /v/ one. I think that’s the should probably all be around the same time. Also, I don’t think that any of the top 8 characters should be barred from the next tournament because so few characters even got nominated. This was kind of a trial run.
>>216755598Except for the winner, surely?
>>216755625Yeah obviously.
>>216724313wait this got to QF's?
>>216737743Chadttler
>>216755509>2026 should definitely have a different month. Could be early in the year, so it's close to Oscar season when there's a lot of interest in films, and while at the other end of the year technically, practically it's close to the two /v/ tourneys, but not right on top of them. January, February or March for instance. Two months if there's two tourneys.I think it should be either January or February, I think the guys at the /tnt/ board on plus4 have their own side tourneys but I don't really care>But I'm very ok with taking this as the official 2025 winner, I don't think it'd be fair to boot a winner or E8, we'd just have the 2025 and 2026 ones only a few months apart.maybe, like I don't want to sound like a fag but I feel like it'd be kind of boring to have an official winner with this little traction, you know?>And maybe we could squeeze in a female tournament before the end of December just to 2025 has two inaugural winners. It is all very haphazard but good films have come from absolute messes dozens of times, a more organized tourney can build on this too.I personally wouldn't want a female tournament, I remember reading people suggesting to split the tourneys for film and television which I guess could work?>>216755598>Also, I don’t think that any of the top 8 characters should be barred from the next tournament because so few characters even got nominated.yeah it was a 64 man tourney, I think that's bullshit as a representation of /tv/, so I personally wouldn't want to have the E8 get booted out for next year, though the finals are fitting, I won't lie>This was kind of a trial run.absolutely, the fucking faggot original host ScuntAnon literally just left the tourney for dead and a kind anon took over as host
>>216755598Well, right before as in a month before. /co/ is September (Ms) and October (Mr). January and February for a Star and Starlet of /tv/ would be right after, but also it would be the next year so the winners will be the winners all year long instead.
>>216755758>>216755598I do think they can still be highlighted as Elite 8 even without the ban. As first ones go it's a good one.
>>216755708We really want to have a /tv/ tournament. We'll take a troll's scraps and make it into a real tourney if we must (and did).
>>216755708I'm as surprised as you are. But we sure could use some help from any experienced tournament hosts you might know around these parts...
>>216724313Peak image.
>>216755708Finals actually!>>216754408
>>216755708Oh, hello there.
>>216754408Any chance we get a poll on possible titles for the tournament besides God Emperor? We had quite a lot of suggestions this thread.
>>216755708It's Ballsanon!
>bane vs ciaWHO DO I VOTE FOR
>>216756492I DON'T KNOW
>>216755789>>216755758If you guys want to do it a different month in 2026 are you guys really planning on doing it in a month or two? I think that’s it’s fine the way it is.
>>216754408Dang wish there was a question on if iconic live action hosts would be allowed.
>>216757004While it does seem very quick, the very random way this one started has made it more of a test run, even if it will determine the inaugural winner. A proper full tourney should first off be cleared with the mods in advance and have a tripfag host or hosts (as it is in the other boards) who make the threads, one at a time, then should actually be announced ahead of time so posters know it's on, get to know the rules and the format, and maybe prepare some nominations. Then the nomination round can be properly done with a doc tracking those that qualify. I guess the numbers received would determine whether a qualifying round is needed or not, but preferably 128 in the final tournament. We lost a lot of this by how this one started, it's only happening because a good anon picked up the slack and made it an actual thing instead of a troll. But I'm just going by how /v/ and /co/ conduct their tourneys, which are pretty decently organized and aren't disruptive to the boards so there's no complaining.
>>216755901same here, if I knew it was happening I would've liked to have participated >>216755981I used to come to /tv/ a lot but maybe in the future if anons want help I can do that
>>216757257Hey Balls. Wanna say hello. The other thing is that I hope we can slowly get updates for the /v/GA voting system. I know it was said it would take time but please let us know so there's not a repeat again of r1 of Queen with some idiot rigging the polls.
>>216755981We don't need a /co/fag in charge of the /tv/ tournaments.
>>216757700I didn't ask him to run it, I asked him for help, given he has experience hosting.
>>216757257>if I knew it was happening I would've liked to have participatedwhen king ended this year someone tried to shitpost a tourney for /tv/ during the afterparty, but OP took up the shitpost and made it actually run.
Wildly unofficial poll about potential names for the tourney, taken from the thread, I'm not the anon hosting, just gauging enthusiasm https://strawpoll.com/3RnYXbOADye
>>216758326>choose at least 6hmmm, okay I suppose
>>216758326Having to choose 6 seems a bit much, no?
>>216758349>>216758368No chose UP to six.
>>216758326"Pope CIA" is too stupid for me not to vote for
>>216758326>Star is good, very uniquely associated with cinema and Hollywood>Lord seems "lesser" than titles like King or Emperor at first but then you think of how much it recurs in fiction as a title. Lord of the Rings is just the tip of the iceberg.>Director is very cool but has no female version>I like Master but not Mistress, gives the wrong impression for a tourney that's already a tough one to pull off.
>>216757800He also has no backup plan when someone openly reveals a round was rigged with over 200 accounts and instead of doing something when it is revealed he simply continued the rigged tournament like nothing. So yes, Balls can help with hosting but if I were you I would not do the same stupid shit he did this year with Queen.
>>216754529>6th place
Seu Madruga will be /tv/ pornstar 2026
>>216759581Based
>>216759385No one asked.
I do not know who to vote for. Bane or CIA?It's the ultimate clash.
>>216759637>please stop pointing out how the hosts in Queen were shown there was rigging and did nothing to salvage the situation and continued with the rigged resultsThe old-fashioned game of sucking the host's dick has gone on long enough and you don't even believe it anon. I'd like for you to actually articulate an argument justifying rigging. so everyone here can hear it. I'll wait.
>he continues rambling to no one
>>216757257>>216757407??
>My name is 216759965. I think rigging is ok when the character that wins goes through but it is bad when the character I want loses
>>216759637nta but the hosts really did a terrible job at the vidya tourneys and let the rigging results in despite the evidence
>>216757083If they're actually playing a character as part of a hosting show, like Elvira or Svengoolie, I don't see why not. But not just a talkshow with a guy.
>>216758326I vooted it
>>216758326Generalbros...
>>216758349>>216758368The settings were wrong, I fixed it.
>>216754408how about a question on what time of year would be good for future?
>>216761174Probably too late to add this to the existing poll, but I could add this question to a separate poll.
I nominate Slowpoke from Pokemon.
Was THIS part of your plan?
>>216752685BELIEVE
>>216762158Of....course. Dr. Pavel...found out what......for you...
>>216762856but who will be brave enough to nominate....him?
>>216763418DON'T YOU NOMIANTE ME YOU SON OF A BITCH
>>216760618GOOLD?
I wish we had this run with more numbers, maybe next year
