/tv/ - >shot for shot remake of the documentary but with - Television & Film

Anonymous

12/20/25(Sat)05:19:23 No.216740809

File: 680739-the-smashing-machi(...).jpg (457 KB, 1000x1500)

Anonymous 12/20/25(Sat)05:19:23 No.216740809 Archived

>shot for shot remake of the documentary but with the Rock, brighter colours and free jazz soundtrack
Wtf was Benny thinking?

Anonymous
12/20/25(Sat)05:34:55 No.216740971

Anonymous 12/20/25(Sat)05:34:55 No.216740971

File: unnamed.jpg (80 KB, 341x512)

80 KB JPG

Many (or at least one) such cases.

Anonymous
12/20/25(Sat)05:49:16 No.216741114

Anonymous 12/20/25(Sat)05:49:16 No.216741114

>>216740809
The part that gets me is that that era had so many more interesting fighters than Kerr. Dudes with absolutely outrageous backgrounds, skillsets, track records. Kerr was better than average, but mostly unremarkable. Make a fucking Fedor movie, a Hendo one, a Rampage one. Goddamn.

Anonymous
12/20/25(Sat)05:50:23 No.216741123

Anonymous 12/20/25(Sat)05:50:23 No.216741123

>>216741114
can't put on enough prosthetics to make the rock look like any of them

Anonymous
12/20/25(Sat)06:26:43 No.216741531

Anonymous 12/20/25(Sat)06:26:43 No.216741531

>>216740809
I love Safdie films, Good time and Heaven knows what are some of my fav movies. And this film... was an absolutely bizarre watch. It's like watching a biopic on acid or something. Everything about it is wrong. It fails as both an arthouse and a straight biopic film. The entire time I was watching it I was just thinking "what the fuck even is this? how did this get made"