This is the ugliest art style ever
>>216934254Go back to /a/
>>216934254Why do Jojofags insist this shit isn't gay?
>>216934276They do? It's gay af, is there a single character in this universe that doesn't look zesty
>>216934254try seeing more than 5 animes tourist fag
>>216934254I want hot sex with gwess.
>>216934254it's pretty bad but there is worse. Simply flipping past this shit back in the day was enough to make me loose my appetite.
>>216934254It’s not as good as Parts 2 or 3 but miles better than 4 and 5.
>>216934381How can that be when 4 is the best part and you're a raging faggot?
GOAT Ocean getting such a mediocre adaptation pains me greatly.
>>216934381Part 5 is second best part after 6.
>>2169344084 is boring slice of life slop with a weak cast that tries too hard to be funny.Kira carries the whole part on his back but he doesn’t even get introduced until halfway through.
>>2169346385 is just 3 again but worse in every way.
>>216934254Fuck off, OP. You have absolutely no right to say that when stuff like South Park, Smiling Friends and that other crap with some deformed teens and their father exists.
>>216934758Its like three but with absolute zesty bucks hell yeah. I do think however that polpo got wasted. Wanted more of that fat fuck.
>>216934758Part 5 had the best aesthetics. Peak no homo.
>>216934563Haven't seen it yet, did they not follow the manga or what?
I like part 6 because it stars women. That makes it the least gay jojo part.
>>216935312I like part 6 a lot too but I wanted more lesbo action.
>>216935169It was the quality that was the problem. Lots of poor animation and direction. It also didn't add any new scenes if I remember right and the part really needs a bit of a breather because its non stop.
>>216934254Everytime they try to emulate the look manga more the uglier it gets, part 6 anime has the ugliest color palette for their outfits too, like they used the colored manga scans for reference except for Jolyne whos palette is even more dull. Genuinely ugly.
>>216934254his artstyle makes women look like men
>>216934276It's homoaffective, but not homossexual
