>when did Harry put his name in the goblet of fire?>we see all the other champions do it>it specifically shows us George and Barry not being able to put the names in as they are too young>so how did harry do it - invisibility cloak or was it a plot hole?
the answer is explicitly stated during the climax of the film
>>216945480Part of Voldemort lives inside Harry's scar and he is 70 or something.
>>216945504It was actually stated by the perpetrator long before that, in fact immediately after his name was pulled off
>BarryWhomst? A potara fusion of Barty and Harry?
>>216945480>this is clearly a plot by Voldemort to get Harry>yes, I agree, we should use Harry as a bait then>fail to do anything>deliver Harry straight to Voldemort, get another student killed in the process>ministry refuses to believe that Voldemort existsVoldemort was literaly the least problem of this demented society.
>>216945737Ministry guy who said Harry has to participate was mindcontrolled at that point.
Why didnt hogwarts have like security in order to avoid shit like cedric or leaks. Arent they like really good at this shit then what happened? Or was dumbledore screwing everything up?
>>216945828hogwarts had literally the best security in the wizarding world. this is as good as it gets when people can just abrakadabra shit
>>216945480You now understand that this movie was dogshit that killed the franchise.
>>216946013>voldemort second in charge infiltrated easily >dementors break in like whatever >no bodyguards or any guards whatsoever for the principal >leaks about the tournament easy to spread>All of this until umbridge assumed power Now what JK. your thatcher allegory didnt work
>when did Harry put his name in the goblet of fire? >we see all the other champions do it >it specifically shows us George and Barry not being able to put the names in as they are too young >so how did harry do it - invisibility cloak or was it a plot hole?
>>216946056Even that movie makes me less mad than Dumbledore winning against Grindelwald with the elder wandThey turned a feat of book 1 into a messy incomprehensible lie with a retcon in book 7
>>216946198It is suggested that deathly hallows are a scam>Resurection Stone doesn't actually resurects people>Invisibility Cloak can be bypassed by a map made by students, Moody's eye and a literal catIt's not strange that the wand is overhyped also.
>>216945504No it wasn't he gets whisked off by Voldermort
If Moody did it why didn't he just abracadabra Harry off the moment he met him?
>>216945480Deh!
>>216946419Yeah but downside of the elder wand was also stated (it counts as beating you if you die off-duel)
>>216946655Because voldy wants to take harry's blood as part of his resurrection ritual.
>>216945480>>216945737I'd swear, these books were published on the first draft.
>>216946056>this movie was dogshit that killed the franchise.The franchise was never good to begin with, you guys were just too little to tell.
