[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


These dead losers always had the shittiest, safest and most pretentious critiques. They filtered countless times.
>>
Because it was fun to see them argue
>>
>>216955603
They basically agreed on everything so their arguments were forced non issues

Fat fuck: Dumb and dumber was an absolute farce

Bald fuck:I disagree. I laughed one time

Fat fuck: you're bald

Bald fuck :you're fat!

That was every conversation these retards ever had
>>
>>216955662
hilarious!
>>
You're just angry because Ebert likely trashed your favorite slop. Almost certainly a Lynchfag, too
>>
>>216955662
Sounds pretty funny to me. Nice reddit spacing btw.
>>
The problem was how right they usually were, even if you liked the movie and didn't agree with them.
>>
I found them entertaining and largely agree with eberts taste. Roger was more old school and pretentious
>>
File: oldfags.jpg (84 KB, 800x640)
84 KB
84 KB JPG
>>216955577

i'm going to disagree with you here. these men provided a valuable service by helping you avoid the slop of the age.

i miss gatekeeping so much. you will realize your time is nothing to throw away as its reserves dwindle down.
>>
There were basically no other movie critics on TV. Gene Shalit and Leonard Maltin got some screentime on morning shows but S&E were the only ones with their own show.
>>
>>216956519
You also watched them to see the previews.
>>
It's fun to see people talk about movies, whether you agree with them or not. They were guys who clearly loved movies and were passionate about them, it's interesting to get their perspectives and some banter.
>>
>>216955577
It was comfy.
>>
>>216955662
Sounds like must see TV circa 1992
>>
>>216956519
You left out Rex Reed
>>
>>216955577
It was before the internet. To find out what movies are coming out, you had to read the newspapers. There were also a fuckload more movies being made back then, including cheap B-movies. You needed people who can sift through the chaff for you.
>>
>>216955577
Ebert has a PULITZER for film criticism. Show some fucking respect. Beyond the TV shows they had, they wrote columns and essays and Ebert wrote books.
His opinion was very important to actors and directors. I've missed him since the day he died.
>>
>>216955662
Actually Gene really championed the Farrelly Brothers and after he died they dedicated Something About Mary to him.
>>
File: 29979-26431-9115.jpg (103 KB, 750x600)
103 KB
103 KB JPG
>>216956301
I'm such an oldfag I remember when /b/ was the place to be. It wasn't ruined by logposting and wieners and "socials". What a cesspool now.
>>
zoomers getting filtered by ebert loving quality anime again:::

https://youtu.be/Il2l3hEEtdk



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.