Overrated.
Underrated
>>216956531Yep. The "Psycho" book is so much better. But maybe for his times his movies were OK, Idk.
Birds was fun. Vertigo was trash
Vertigo was meh
Vertigo was good
Rear Window: I'm in a wheelchair and will spy on my neighbors while I have a hot gf
he made a ton of garbage in the 30s, absolute shit. he got better.
>>216956531Rear Window is great
>>216956531Disagree. Old movies suck. But his are still very watchable.
>>216957826Saboteur was mid but but they're mostly the first time those devices of storytelling were done on film. He innovated
>>216956531
39 steps is creaky but still so rousingly epic. Lady vanishes is perfect + so quaint, it's a time capsule like king Kong.
What are some "rated" directors?
>>216957849right, he made some not-so-shit but his technique was very rough and he was obsessed with adding terrible comedy bits in>>216957855love me some 39 steps even though its absolutely retarded, lady vanishes is okay but it suffers most from the comedy shtick i think. the 70s remake has a weirdly terrible cast outside angela lansbury but its much comfier in tone.
>psycho>strangers on a train>birds>frenzy>rear window>north by northwest>ropeMan was a kino machine
>>216957888rope is explicitly non-kino because it is theatrical. very very good, but jimmy stewart always is.
>>216956531>Overrat-ACK
