Mike won.
>>216964899Hopefully they do the whole trilogy. RotJ was raped.
How are they gonna do Jabba? It'll be funny when RLMcucks find out the original cut kinda sucked lmao.
You can like the Prequels and still advocate for multiple versions of the film. Not sure why these 2 unrelated points are being conflated.
>>216964975he doesn't appear, dumbass
>>216964975kys retard
>>216964986There’s a handful of autists here that feel the need to defend the special editions because they have to defend Lucas and the prequels by proxy. But yeah in general I don’t even think that most prequelfag like the special editions.
>>216964899imagine wasting decades of your life in your parent's basement doing fan edits named project4K_778910 pretending to be proper restorations only for disney to suddenly release a restoration of the theatrical cuts, rendering your subpar efforts meaningless KEKLMAO
Mike is the reason we got TFA, which was just a ripoff of ANH. he convinced everyone Star Wars could only be this one thing so instead of making a proper realistic political sequel trilogy they had to reboot the OT instead
will they release it on streaming so we can download?
>>216965144> Mike is the reason we got TFAhe even endorsed JJ Abrams as director. but tired to back peddle after
>>216965100That's pajeet mentality. It'll be fun to compare when they release these on blu ray
I'm not opposed to this. I like all 6 SW movies.
>>216965100They're not actually restoring the real original version, and I can prove what I say. Book is coming.
>>216964899who is mike?
>>216965173If they intend on keeping the film clean without any crappy dnr and the like then streaming/downloading it sounds miserable. Best thing we can hope for is a proper blu ray release.>>216965217How so? Is there info out there?
>>216965100>he thinks it's the real cut>he thinks yidney will just let him have access to it forever
>>216964899>remake>with AIIndia century SARS!
>>216965049I'll defend the SE's in as much as they do have genuine improvements, and I think directors have every right to revisit their movies (no one gives Ridley Scott shit).I'd still like every cut of the movie to be available in the best quality possible.You don't understand holding a nuanced position, because everything is a team sport, to people like you.
>>216965217yes, waste the rest of your life on a fanfic book nobody will read KEK
>>216965254>How so? Is there info out there?I'm writing the book right now. My sources are from Lucasfilm and officially released products. Anything I cannot prove is admitted. In a court of law it would stand up quite well.
>>216965293SAAAR AI AND INDIA ARE VALID!! SAAAR YOU ARE TIMMIE!!
>>216965209changes are fun to compare. noise and grain structure on pretentious fan edits? not so much
>>216965293Lucasfilm left some proof decades ago, anon. Not many have seen it because one needs either a PC that's old enough to play older software, or they need to bother with a DOSbox or other solution.
>>216965316I want rescans and restorations to have grain and the like. I don't get why there are people who want these things to be blurry and smoothed out. Go watch modern movies if that's what you want.
What no one wants to admit is that all 6 movies could probably use a new cut.A lot of the hasty decisions of the old SE's need to be reversed, but also a lot of the wonky CGI needs updating.We don't need to go back to "yub nub", windowless Cloud City, or a complete lack of exteriors for Moss Eisley. Honestly, it's fine.Then again, I don't want to give Disney ideas.
>>216965001This. It was a deleted scene that Lucas added back in with cgi jaba
>>216965311LMAO not even jeets will pirate your bookcope and seethe
>>216965311Why do Indians pick on Timothy Chalamet?
>>216965349Anyone who is interested in the real actual original version will want to read it and real official proof is indeed offered. Not my opinion or memories, but actual proof, not evidence, but final proof.
>>216965049> But yeah in general I don’t even think that most prequelfag like the special editions.us prequel fags don’t like 99% of the changes outside of a new english to common letters changed, some minor corrections to dialogue and the emperor in strikes back
>>216965334>I want rescans and restorations to have grain and the likethey do. the official 4K versions are great with a nice grain structure, unlike third generation scans from fans who can't tell the different between grain and noise KEK
>>216965385explain what in the dickens you're talking about, schizo.
>>216965203all he did was acknowledge that Disney maybe watched plinkett but couldn't confirm it. It's not like the guy drive to Disney headquarters and said "Hire JJ Now, You Fucks!”He made a funny internet video, said the star trek reboot was good (before JJ ruined the series with his sequels), and 10 years later Disney decided to follow the advice (without taking into consideration that JJ actually fucking sucks at everything he does and Mike's opinion was outdated)
>>216965385yeah yeah, whatever you need to tell yourself to sleep at night>le proof>le actual proof>le final proofLMAO
The Max Rebo musical number is way better than the original.
>>216965401>I'm going to act like an asshole from the start and basically COMMAND you to do things.No, you can buy my book instead.
>>216965489which book?
>>216965478I enjoy your post because you're so wrong.Without spoilers, the version Disney is restoring is an edit, the fourth one actually.
>>216965515Not done writing it yet. Sorry, I got a life too.
>>216965451nah, Mike fucked uswe could have had Lucas' vision of the sequels with Leia restoring the republic and Maul coming back
>>216965541>I got a life tooclearly, you don't
>>216964899Anyone skeptical that there exists an original cut, considering George says the source were worn out 20 years ago?
>>216965573yeah, 20th century fox was careless
>>216965566I don't matter, you don't matter, but the book does. You can try and trash talk me, but my book is loaded with facts. And the key facts are backed up by proof, not evidence that is debatable in any way.
>>216965217Its a print, but its a very, very well preserved three color separation print whose colors have not faded. It loos fantastic, but they’ll almost certainly jot use its original opening crawl.
>>216965573George Lucas, myself, and possibly The Vatican has the exact original version. Although mine is technically not a copy because it isn't, it's a reconstruction of Lucas's original.I mentioned the Vatican because they have copies of nearly everything. Everything.
>>216964899No one won.Unless you have a copy of the 1995 laser disc/VHS anniversary release you cannot get the theatrical cut of the OG trilogy...it's all butchered by Lucas
>>216965636Even those prints were struck after Lucas altered it.
>>216965666The 1995 release is very far removed from being original in video and audio departments.
>>216965648>Although mine is technically not a copy because it isn't, it's a reconstruction of Lucas's originalyeah, they were released on DVD as a bonus for normal people to own if they wanted to
>>216965515All of them, blueberry scout.
>>216965702That bonus version is the fourth edit, but Lucas considers that to be his "original."
>>216965237Mike Plinkett.He wrote a lengthy book review once, before his house fell off the cliff into lake michigan.
>>216964899>>216965573>>216965636>>216965698>>216965702I think this video is an interesting dive into all of the different versions of the Original Trilogy (and the Prequel Trilogy).https://youtu.be/xaeTOMvf67c
>>216965783That's a good channel DESU
>>216965783>into all of the different versions of the Original TrilogySeen it and it's not complete, sorry.
>>216965344Give me yubnub or give me death.One is a fucking tribal party song that matches the scene and closes out the original film in an upbeat, intimate & fun way.The fucking SE version completely butchers that, gives us a fucking Star Trek Enterprise like adult contemporary theme that neither fits the scene nor makes any fucking sense in the timeline and is bland, boring and cold.Unfirgivable.Repent.
>>216964899they're already making the 90s toys again, why not just release the original trilogy on bluray or whatever? put the original box set art onto each one for nostalgiafags and charge 80 bucks for the whole set
>>216965783>>216965826Stop advertising your channel, Rick.
>>216965648Do you have the secret scene where Luke turns directly to the camera, and reads out your complete name and address?
>>216965273There's like one good improvement in the entire SE trilogy, and that's the ending song in Return of the Jedi.
>>216965273I give Ridley Scott shit. His “Deckard is a replicant” edits in The Final Cut made the movie retroactively worse.
>>216965451> He made a funny internet video, with tens of millions of views btw. saying politics is boring. and guess what we got?
why don’t they just reboot the entire sequels? or is it too late with carie fisher gone?
>>216965451>He made a funny internet videofunny...?!
>>216965989At least the original cuts were available on the blu rays and weren’t hidden like Star Wars
>>216965842But people will make fun of us with pointing-jakk memes for yubnub ewoks. We better not get too hyped up.
>>216966045Fisher being dead is a problem, but Disney will never admit that they dropped the ball with the sequel trilogy. The only thing we could get is more televisions shows after Return of the Jedi with deepfake cgi actors.
>>216966111so, what if I want to watch the theatrical cut in 8K?
>>216966308>8KNot a thing for Star Wars.
>>216965049The only thing I dislike about the special editions is the Jabba scene in ANH since it's redundant after the Greedo scene. The seething is mostly overblown.
>>216964899So if I like the prequels I'm supposed to hate this because...?
>>216964899No one cares anymore about star wars except for a few low-t millennial manbabbys.
>>216966323Blade Runner.
>>216966323>not a thingi TaLk LiKe A 2yo aNd eXpEcT PpL ToO TaKe Me SrLoUsRLyKys in the face. It’s 2025, all archival scans are performed at 8k & only distributed at 4k post edit. Learn to use your fucking words, not spew memespeak like an etard.
>>216966542Probably not as well. Even if it's possible it won't look all that better because of the lenses and film stock.
>>216966335The stuff where they overly mess with footage (namely the Greedo and Jabba scenes) are clunky and garish to look at. That's my only major problem with the SE's, really. I think the new establishing shots on a lot of locations are good, actually. I think touching up the laser effects or whatever are fine. I don't really care.
>>216966566I know you're angry, but I still know more than you, see: >>216966573
>>216966463I didnt care either but now that im old and the world had gone to utter shit, I have nothing to hold on to but the past, so there is nothing more important in my life than seeing the things I liked when I was a happy 8yo not fucked with and properly, respectfully restored to their original state, not attacked and butchered to fit someones newfangled ideas du jour.It’ll happen to you fucks too, just wait.
>>216966639>the things I liked when I was a happy 8yo not fucked with and properly, respectfully restored to their original state, not attacked and butchered to fit someones newfangled ideas du jour.I'm writing my book for anons exactly like you.
>>216966598You don’t know dick. I’ve got the leaked fucking file, you’re still spitballing imagining hypotheticals, you jackass.
>>216966700What file, Mr. Happy?
>>216964899Lucas has final say on his art and it is his opinion if one wishes to enjoy Star Wars they should watch final special editions of Episode I - VI in numerical order.One can enjoy it in another way but according to the artist that is not the optimal way.The best way to think about the earlier editions is to think about an incomplete painting. Sure you can look at the incomplete painting, enjoy it, and maybe even think its better than the complete painting but it would be sub optimal
>polyshitop is a massive faggot for getting his news from polyshit
>>216964899>Prequelfag humiliation ritual You will eat shit, fatso.
>>216966730The trouble is, Lucas said Star Wars 1977 as released in May of that year was the final edit. Then he changed it at least 7 more times, just for SW alone.
>>216965451Mike never suggested that JJ should WRITE though.
>>216966700WHAT FILE? MOVIE LEAK? ANY TORRENT LINK?
star wars fatigue is real
>>216965543>we could have had Lucas' vision of the sequels with Leia restoring the republic and Maul coming backGeorge would have had to recast the leads and he's too cowardly to do that
>>216966789jj didnt write the force awakes retard
>>216966770I don't see how that is trouble. The artist didn't feel the work was complete so he continued to work on it until it was finalized later.The work is complete when the artist said it is complete and that happened later than 1977.If you enjoy his earlier incomplete work that is awesome, more power to ya, but it is incomplete and I want to watch the Star Wars that the creator says is his finished complete work.
>>216966811> star wars fatigue is realdisney wars fatigue is real. people just want good shit to watch. like andor
>>216966198>Fisher being dead is a problem, but Disney will never admit that they dropped the ball with the sequel trilogy.Easy fix.>Make it animated, but realistic mocap animation. Something like Death Stranding. https://youtu.be/wbLstJHlC4U?si=0WPa_xLD8hoAM2o3>Recast of course.>Because the ST didn't use episodes in their titles, we can use those here.>Use George's treatments.
>>216966789That's clearly his little cope to escape the accusations that Disney did exactly what he wanted, which they did.Plus, none of the ST was solely written by JJ, and they also brought on Lawrence Kasdan, who Mike also puffed up as one of the "true talents" behind the original movies.
>>216966814just AI deep age them and AI recreate carie fisher
>>216966836Yeah, but her said it was final four times before the 80s even got rolling. And then people bought the film with the notion that it was the thing released in theaters in 1977 when it is no such thing.
>>216966867Just do it in Lego. Fuck it.
And his original work is pretty frigging complete, so the idea that it's like a blank canvas in spots is just wrong and frankly insulting to one's intelligence.
>>216966863There's no way disney was going to not meddle in the scripts no matter who was directing/writing.Creative control in big budget movies is long dead unless you are Nolan for some reason.
>>216966888Don't tempt me, Satan.
They would have balls so big, if they made the Lego Star Wars movie, and it was just an actual good sequel trilogy.
>>216966635>>216966635>>216966635thoughts?
>>216966879he changed his mind, simple asi don't see why that is an issue. he released something he thought was complete but changed his mind and later released a revision.this happened a few times and eventually he sold the work to Disney and when that happened his ability to revise the work ceased.Until he sold it to Disney it was like a painter who owned the canvas and he was free to update and revise the painting. When he sold to Disney it is like an artist selling the painting. The new owner can do what they want, burn it if they like, but that is something else and not the work of Lucas.
>>216964899>newly restored>original cutI want to see the version before they made THX. That's the original cut
>>216967044George can do as many updates as he likes. No problem.Just don't make the original cut so hard to get. Put it as a special feature on a new edition dvd idgaf
Being a star wars fan is a humiliation ritual itself ;^)
>>216966966*Man I'm glad I know the facts. Heh. The trolls really do think I'm stupid and they're smart. Ha!*
>>216965237George Lucas' arch nemesis
I can't watch Star Wars without Maclunkey
>>216965237A fat midwit.
>>216967096>is of the tribePoopery
>>216967075>the artist is obligated to provide me with the version of his work that I preferThink about what you are demanding.
The problem with the Special Editions was never that they were created, it was that the original versions were buried and no one would release them again. That doesn't really matter now but it did back then, and that's what pissed people off so much.
>>216967132I didn't say obligated, but we are talking specifically about star wars here.The original cut was massive and frankly important to film history. And don't act like you don't know how fucking stingy Lucas was with it.There was no reason it couldn't have been made available after the shift to dvd. In fact george woulda made even more money
>>216967198Not them, but come on, not even the original cut is available to Congress. You think it is, but it isn't. Now you stopped reading and are retrieving a link proving that someone gave Congress the real deal under the table. I know all that, but it's still not the real deal.
>>216967142What pissed people off is that an artist has a vision for his work that did not align with what people had built in their heads and they felt Lucas was obligated to fulfill their desires and not his.>>216967198>There was no reason it couldn't have been made available after the shift to dvd. In fact george woulda made even more moneyno technical reason but that is not the point. for whatever reason he felt the work was incomplete and decided to make changes and he felt those changes should be the version that is released in the better formats.you can disagree and you can hate the new versions but Lucas never had to release any version on any format. He was within his right to release whatever version he wanted and people should not be upset by that.
>>216967265>What pissed people off is thatNo, it was that I couldn't go buy the original versions on DVD easily. I was around back then and I remember it. The special editions could have been ignored if you didn't like them but Lucas wanted to make those the only versions of the films that anyone could acquire.
>>216965144No he isn't. You faggots always seem to fucking forget the prequels sucked. And yeah that shitty FOrce Awakens movie is only worse than Revenge of the Sith
>>216967265>What pissed people off is that an artist has a vision for his work that did not align with what people had built in their heads and they felt Lucas was obligated to fulfill their desires and not his.Cut this shit out. Nobody would have cared and would be more lenient on the special editions if the original was easily available.I don't dislike the special editions outside the Greedo change anyway. If George didn't want people to want acess to the original version then he should never have made it available.It's his right to do whatever he wants, doesn't mean we cant criticize it.
>>216967302>Lucas wanted to make those the only versions of the films that anyone could acquire.Yes an artist gets to determine which versions of his art are reproduced and sold. This is not something new that Lucas pioneered.
>>216966045>>216966198just recast her, simple. it's not like Obi-Wan was played by the same actor in the OT and the PT
>>216967366What are you his lawyer?Nobody is debating that George had any legal obligation to do so. It was still faggot behavior on his part to not do it
Reminder Lucas is a hypocritical fag because he was moaning (rightly) about Ted Turner colorizing b&w movies then turns around and pointlessly fucks with his edits and keeps Star Wars 77 off the market.
>>216966716>>216966805Niggas the files leaked a couple months ago, around the same time as the press videos for its restoration were made.Yall are asleep at the wheel over here.
>>216967456Yeah, other people's movies. People who were dead by that point.
>>216967465File(s) as in plural?
>>216967401>It was still faggot behavior on his part to not do itThink about how lenient Lucas was with fan creations. He was kind enough to provide audio samples for people to use and would allow people to play in his world with few restrictions.Lucas was the exact opposite of being a faggot when it came to how generous he was with the fans. Fans could create to their hearts content because Lucas as an artist respects the work of other artists.Demanding Lucas release what you want him to release instead of what he wants to release is faggot behavior. People are doing it in this thread and its disgusting.
>>216967465WHAT FILES ? QRD? LINKS?
>>216966814nah, Disney could have still used George's original blueprint after buying the rights instead of not just rebooting ANH
>>216967468He'd have objected even if the filmmakers agreed to colorizing because it's philistine bullshit
>>216967518Yeah fuck art preservation! Fuck history!As long as the industry laws are followed nothing else matters!You gotta be baiting or soul less suit for a marketing firm.All that other shit George did for the fans? Great! It's completely irrelevant to the point
>>216967578>Yeah fuck art preservation! Fuck history!As long as the artist is alive if they want to destroy their property they are free to do so. I don't care how valuable it is to others because it does not belong to them.
>>216967618Yeah and that would be selfish behavior. Thanks for playing
>>216967265you seem to think that someone can legitimately own the rights to a piece of art they created. IP is a bad joke. who owns the rights to the idea of Dracula, for example. George should be allowed to put out new films but then anyone that wants to should be able to put out the originals. IP laws give the creator of a piece of work too much power
>>216967553It's not inherently wrong to return to a piece of art after the fact.People literally only think this because they don't like the Star Wars SE's.Even Tolkien was planning to basically rewrite the Hobbit, at one point, because it does stick out as clunkily written, and out of step with Lord of the Rings in some regards.
>>216964899Of all the catastrophes to befall this franchise, the Special Editions will always be the worst. Nothing Disney ever does can ever be as bad as Lucas actively destroying the original films.
>>216967639That is how ownership works. Now that Lucas sold the property to Disney they are free to do with it what they want. Maybe they will preserve the original film or maybe they will destroy it, who knows.What you are arguing is that a man does not have ownership of his property. If enough people think something is of a high enough value they are free to make demands of a person and force them to do things they don't want to do.You are basically arguing that Lucas is a slave if enough people think he should be.
>>216967698who owns Shakespeare?
>>216966847This.I just want to live in the fucking star wars world for a while, but like in the OT that everybody actually liked, not in some fucking gaudy cgi wasteland like the prequels, not in some gluttonous 80,000 twirling lightsabres at every opportunity & 20 more doom moons and stupid low voiced looking through their eyebrows comic book villains, no siths & jedis around every corner, none of that shit. Luke needs to continue to grow, learn, and utilize his wisdom to make choices as he becomes a man and makes his way alone in the galaxy. Thats a lifetime of material they never even bothered with. A single trudge through a gloomy swamp to have a confusing talk to yoda was 1000x more interesting than any of the trash the sequels contained, and they gave up & just started shovelling twirling glow stix down our throats and calling it star wars instead.
>>216967662I think Lucas owned the original film as in the bits of celluloid and he was free to scan that film and use it to create new dvds or whatever and that is what he did.People still owned their vhs copies of the old version or whatever.What people in this thread are demanding is that Lucas scan his original film and edit up a version that they want released, not what he wanted to release, and that is little more than slavery.
>>216967698No you cocksucking fine print licking little boot fondler. I am not arguing about Georges legal obligation on any fucking level. Stop quoting ip law on me like it makes any difference to the moral point.George can legally do what he wants with it, but he is an asshole for locking it up and making it unavailable, considering how important the original cut is to history and that there was a clear and obvious market demand for it.
>>216964899I've seen this movie enough times, but I like the idea of old movies coming back to theatres, so I may just buy a ticket and stay home
>>216967764At this point no one his works are in the public domain and people are free to copy them, edit them, and release books of them as they wish.One day Star Wars will be in the public domain and people will be free to do with it what they want just like Shakespeare.
How did you people get to be such absolute faggot contrarians over a YouTube channel?
> Twelve Years a GeorgeOk he can burn all his negatives and no one can raise and eyebrow because that's slavery
>>216964899You'd have to be clinically retarded to care about star slop at this point.
>>216967808when does a house that someone owns become public domain?
>>216967504Yeah the theatrical scan of this print, plus the outtake scenes scanned at the same time. They were on tpb but under cryptic names. I stumbled on them by chance looking for a plugin package a colleague was trying to upload to me. Then i searched their filenames and found a vid of Harmy coyly discussing them, so theyre “around”.
>>216965049>the autists are the people defending the official versions of the films and not the faggots who get hung up over minor shit like Han shooting after Greedo or seeing a Dewback on Mos Eisley and are obsessed over outdated effectslmao this is your brain on internet echo chambers
>>216967767no they have a problem with other people not being allowed to release his versions
>>216967875When it's forcibly taken from you in a communist revolution
>>216967784I may just biy a ticket and stay home to Carrie Fishers O face side by side with Sasha Grey getting her sweet round ass turned inside out by a whole line of dudes.In fact i think, fuck the ticket imma fap right noww
>>216966045>skipped through the first one >only saw select scenes on YT of the 2nd one>only saw "somehow, Palpatine returned" on YT of the 3rd one (i rewatch that one from time to time)am I based?
>>216967875Never, as far as I am aware. What is your point?Regardless it is a moot point. The ownership of the original negatives I assume were transferred to Disney along with the IP.At some point in time the film will enter the public domain even if Disney retains ownership over the film negatives forever.
>>216967875When after decades of disuse, it stops being maintained and is societies problem to deal with legally, just like ip law.
>Copyright laws are sacred guys>Hang on Disney just paid millions of dollars to have the public domain limit extended again
>>216967937>>216967986see, the point i'm trying to make is that IP isn't actually property because we don't govern it under the same laws as other things you can own. therefore ideas mustn't be naturally ownable and their ownability must be just something be artificially constructed
>>216967990you could theoretically pass a house down for an indefinite numbers of generations
>>216965217based autist
>>216967265This. But specifically it's pure autismoBasically manchildren (because that's the only people who give a fuck about "muh SW 1977 cut", any normal fucking person watches the SE just fine) want to live out the same experience they lived when they first watched SW when they were 6 or whatever. The issue is that they won't ever feel that way again so they seethe at everythingThey seethe at the SE and extremely minor changes even though there are fan remakes like 4k77 that have existed for years now and are for autists like themThey seethe at the PT because it wasn't just the OT again and it didn't make them feel like they did when they were childrenThe biggest issue this generation of babies has is the lack of understanding that you can't go back to your childhood. It's gone. Grow the fuck up already
>>216964899Didn't they rerelease the prequels in theaters like 6 months ago or something
>>216968091>Just delete history bro who cares its just autismos who care about it
>>216968061Personally I don't have a problem with people doing a edit of a film but at that point the edit becomes a derivative work of art and is no longer the work of George Lucas.If bob wants to release his custom version of Star Wars and says this is Bobs version of Star Wars that is fine by me. Not the law but that is something else.The problem I have is if Bob tries to pass off his edit as the original work of art by Lucas and not an edit by Bob.
>>216968091i'm seething at your post right now fuck you aha
>>216968129Comparing the outdated cut of a movie to history IS autism retardReminds me of all the megafaggots who act like lost media akin to A Day With Spongebob is on the level of importance of the missing Greek and Roman epics. No it fucking isn't, you're just delusional and can't get over the fact that nobody who was worthwhile shit to do cares about a Spongebob knockoff that was on stores for like three months at best. Same shit applies to SW
>>216968150Bob can still give ol' George credit while still releasing George's creations though
>>216965001Never even occurred to me that people didn't know this.
>>216968108They released Episode I and I watched it alone at the local AMC. Never before have I watched a movie in a theater by myself, it was kino.I got a big bucket of popcorn and a beer and had a blast.
>>216968192Star Wars was important enough to be saved.As much as possible should be saved. I'm not going to greave for some Spongebob advert from the 90s that nobody recorded, but if it's saved I'm glad.Just because you don't give a shit doesn't mean its not important. How about since you don't give a shit about archiving you stop broadcasting your brazen ignorance here at least.
>>216968083You could, or the city could claim your run-down shitbox as abandoned, condemn & demolish it to dump the liability of it, or sell it for a dollar to someone who’ll actually make use of it. …all of which happens every day in this country. In ip, if you dont maintain your ip, spend money defending it legally, you end up with a very hard time defending it at all. From Jay fuckin Z or whoever. However, if youre broke AF, this may be your best option, hoping someone piches your work and then makes millions on it, so you can sue them for a slice of that big fat pie, rather than spending your $ up front defending it and having no one wanting to use your shit bc its expensive. The former gets you paid, the latter you pay and usually get nothing. Like everything in this country, IP law and its actual application are a fucking mess made by & for big business. The rest of us are foraging for their breadcrumbs.
>>216967948
>>216964899>original cut>newly restoredI'm sure George conducted minimal electrical inefference
>>216968282Whatever. No point discussing with you, you're too obsessed with this nonsense.Just heed my warning: it won't be enough. You'll give Disney money to watch an old outdated film upscaled with shitty AI, expecting to finally satiate that part of you that wants to be a kid again, but it won't. And who knows what you'll blame that time, maybe you'll say SW was never good anyways or you'll say it's the AI or something else. The reality is, again, you need to grow up
>>216968317uh huh yeah but there are a lot of people who would argue that the city should not be allowed to do that and that a house can be passed down indefinitely. logically if you think ideas are actually ownable you should argue for no public domain for them and that e.g. the Tolkien estate can own the rights to the LotR in perpetuity
>>216968382You are the biggest corpo dick sucking faggot on /tv/, congratulations.For the record, I barely give a shit about Star Wars at all, and I haven't knowingly given Disney a cent in over 10 years.
>>216968429>You are the biggest corpo dick sucking faggot on /tv/In what way? I am precisely fighting against watching this movie and giving Disney any money. Last Disney film I watched was TLJ. You're the one that's saying that Disney exploiting nostalgiafags and using their autism as a cashcow is great because it means archival.
WHATS WRONG WITH YOUR FACE??? ANSWER ME THING THE MOUTH FACE!
>>216968481>Disney exploiting nostalgiafags and using their autism as a cashcow is great because it means archival.Fuck you. I was always talking about George Lucas. I care about art preservation and that history isn't fucked with. My entire point is that George was an asshole for locking the original cut away.I HATE Disney and I hate miserable little penpushers like you that argue that ip law is just or moral, just because.Go buttchug some bleach
