Ffs, this. Just... no.
>>216966540man you know there's another thread going but I'm watching this teaser now and I just don't like the way it looks. I know obviously cameras and technology have changed but idk whose job it is, lighting, director? but they made it look weird
>>216966540>Ffs, this. Just... no.
>They could only afford Cranston for 4 episodeslol, lmao even.I bet this is going to be used to set up some halfassed sequel like "Fuller House" or "That 90s Show" or whatever the fuck, it'll prob star the least famous of the 4 kids and their dysfunctional family.
>REMAKE EVERYTHING! REBOOT EVERYTHING! RETELL EVERYTHING! REIMAGINE EVERYTHING! MORE SEQUELS AND PREQUELS! BRING BACK ACTORS WITH WRINKLES, WALKERS AND IN WHEELCHAIRS! MAKE IT WOKE! MAKE IT BROKE! ADD MORE BROWN AND GAY! NO ORIGINAL IP ALLOWED NEVER EVER!
UmMaybe we could just..i don't know? Just not?
>>216966949>I'm watching this teaser now and I just don't like the way it looks. I know obviously cameras and technology have changed but idk whose job it is, lighting, director?I thought the same. I wish they would have used filters to make it look like the original show.Roseanne and That 70s Show reboots look the same than what they did back then.
didn't pay much attention but haven't seen Dewey, Jamie and the sixth baby
>>216967332Dewey was recasted, looks identicalJamie apparently doesn't have a major role in the story, but he is there. He's the one on the left wearing whiteThe new kid (named Kelly) as the plot summaries has been leading to, was born a girl but apparently is gonna be non binary, to keep the joke that Lois only had dudes. It's the one underneath Jamie. She has more plot relevance because they will explore her character with Lois and Hal, and her sibling rivalry with Jamie
>>216966540>non-binary sisterLGBTBBQBRAAAP+ Chads. We won.
>>216967746Thank you anon
>>216967844they will be the best part of the reunion show
>>216966540Well atleast you didn't post the trailer so I don't have to watch it
How hard are you going to clap when Hal talks about his old pals Saul and Jessie and say they used to call him Heisenberg?
>>216967746Is this Dewey's wedding? he's not in the picture.
>>216968524It's been done https://youtu.be/GtYNX3JWzjc?si=r1Vu9L-OnruPb7JR
>>216968080oiy! wtf is that thing?
>Remember that thing you liked? Here's a shittier, cleaner version of it with none of the charm!When will this end?
>>216969578when you stop paying for streaming
>>216969578after you die
who is this for? people who enjoyed the original series won’t watch the new woke crap they come up with and the newer generation doesn’t give a crap about any of this
>>216966540don't care, still watching it
>>216969578it won't, you'll just have to learn to embrace the slop
>>216967134Can't do anything but the safest option in order to maximize profits- if they don't, someone else will.We just don't invest in real art anymore. Sign of a failing economy.
>>216966540this trailer felt so soulless, whats with all these nostalgia reboots being ass? Does half the budget go towards pulling the actors out of retirement?
>>216970486it feels like they were not in role , but just the actors doing a skit together.
>>216967746Does Cynthia show up?
>>216967746Or Jessica?
>>216967746>they have a trans kid and they will be the major focus and...
>>216967746>but apparently is gonna be non binary, to keep the joke that Lois only had dudes.Then make her ftm, sure non binary doesn't mean shit but it certainly doesn't mean dude.
>>216969952The safest option would be to stop pandering to women and browns and go back to their original constituency of young Western men, but they don't seem to be willing to do that.
>>216969952it's not just a sign of a failing economy, it's the sign of a failing culture.
>>216971458>the signa sign*
maybe just....don't watch it?
>>216966540>shitty punk rock chick version of the theme>not the original TMBG versionFuck you Disney. They're really skimping out on the budget with this one
