College degrees will become worthless because of AI. Then we'll see whos laughing now.
Good
>>216996580We Humanities Chads tried to warn you.You are nothing more than replaceable code monkeys. When it becomes more convenient to replace you with a pajeet or AI they will
Who fucking cares anymore? Who is even bringing children into this world anymore so they can go 67 67 67 ad infinitum? Fucking NPCs. I sound awful saying this but it’s true. I’m sorry well-adjusted people of 4chan.
>>216996580DILLY DILLY MY BROTHERS
>>216996685Asteroid mining will give us a utopia 100 years from now. Have some faith.
I am autistic so my college degree has always been worthless.
I went to an online school, make over six figures and hate myself for it.
>>216996729Utopia is boring so people will keep electing clown Presidents who are somehow also the next literally Hitler so they have something to freak out about.
>>216996741That’s why I never even bothered going to college.
South Park was right. Better start learning a trade.
>>216996580Every kind of training will become worthless because of AI. It'll be office jobs first (and to a certain degree this is already happening, as more and more entry-level stuff is being automated). Then it'll come for the trades as AI-powered robotics start to hit the market. The difference between those two points might be a few years since robotics requires building the actual production facilities before you can get it off the ground, but I doubt we'll have any blue-collar jobs left decade from now. The demand for a worker that doesn't sleep, doesn't require pay, and can't file complaints is just too high.The professions that last the longest are going to be ones that humans artificially hold onto for cultural reasons, like teachers and hospice nurses--not because these jobs can't be done better by AI, but because humans will probably take a generation or two before we're willing to hand those jobs over. Nobody born in a world without AI wants a robot to deliver their baby or instruct their children or care for their dying parent. But even so, once our first generation of humans grows up in a fully-AI world, that taboo will die too. Bottom line, nobody in this thread is retiring in the profession they're currently in, except maybe if you happen to be an actual AI scientist, in which case you'll last until AI gets better at developing AI than you are.
>>216997432This two more weeks post? Written in 2015.
>>216997432How will this reflect on dating? If nobody works which men would be pursued by women?
>>216997557lamo no
>>216997557>>216997584Doh I misread your question. If this has permeated labor and every facet of life then pray to whatever god you have that AI also has delivered us from conventional bio-vagina pursuit reproduction
>>216997557Who fucking knows dude. How will it reflect on work? How will it reflect on human learning? How will it reflect on wealth, or quality of life, or anything else? No one has any idea. There's a smattering of tech companies engaged in a mad-dash to control the future of humanity and none of them can agree (or even really nail down, outside of "it'll be great") what that actually looks like. The prevailing idea here is basically to win the race to true AGI first, then figure everything out later, with the understanding that if you're the winner you get to decide how the world works afterwards.Everybody, including me or anyone else in this thread, that pretends like they actually know what the world's going to look like more than a few years in advance in anything but the vaguest terms is full of shit. Even my "ten year" thing for blue-collar jobs--that could be five years, that could be three years, who knows? People were predicting that we wouldn't have machines capable of passing the Turing Test for decades right up until ChatGPT launched and blew past it like it was nothing. All of this growth is exponential, nobody knows how far away the finish line is, and nobody knows what the world looks like afterwards.
