Inb4>It's only a vibe a broKys subhuman. I am also looking for something beyond superficials like>It's about human evolution bro>It's a celebration of the upcoming space age broPut some effort into it.
>>217004614Super beings controlling humanity. That’s the movie that’s it. What else do you want you nigger?
>>217004662That's vapid. Is that all there is to it to the supposed greatest film of all time?
>>217004735I appreciate having people like you around to cook fries and dig ditches.
>>217004760Capeshit has more depth than that kek. I suppose midwit boomers don't like to be challenged.
>>217004614The biggest case of Emperor's new clothes in cinema.
>>217004760Hilarious concession.
>>217004818All capeSHIT is this movie over and over and over and over. You’re just too stupid to realize it.
>>217004614>I don’t know how to read!Yes, OP. We know.
>>217004614>Put some effort into it.I think the reason 2001 triggers retards like this so hard is because the film is so obviously well made and morons like this guy get super upset when watching it because it makes crystal clear that if you want to make anything of quality it is going to require two things they dont have, talent and the ability to work hardAnd so they just come here and pretend not to "get it"Theres an image I saved a while back that resonated with me and it said something like online political discourse is impossible these days because 90% of it is just leftists pretending not to understand things, thats what I thought when I read this drivel
Hal and the monolith are interchangeable
>>217004614>hey you, put some effort into my low effort thread
>>217005010>making it about left or right immediatlybitch, he's asking about a movie, get your bearings
2deep4u
>>217004951>>217005010>>217005033Notice how these boomers do anything but articulate their views on why this is deep. Hilarious.
>>217004614It's not deep. It's the Avatar of its day. Gimmicky travalogue movie made for the cinerama.
>>217005063Lmao>"Hey! You're not allowed to criticize me!"Something else that I thought of, you see these threads on /tv/ about 2001 constantly, like every dayBut you never see them made about The Third Man, you know why?The statistical probability of some moron like this sitting down and watching The Third Man all the way through is effectively 0% but they will watch 2001 because le heckin space and reddit threads!
>>217005258Schizo meltdown
>>217005289Are you okay?
>>217004614one of the few space flicks who paints an "accurate" depiction of an incident in space>the emptyness>the vastness>the scale>the loneliness>the horrorman was not made to go beyond the atmosphere of the earth, Kubrick understood that even though plenty of other people at that time didn'tcompare 2001 to Gravity (which has a more realistic scenario) and hopefully you'll get itbut.. is that "deep"? I think so, but then again I can't fully know. OPs question is a bit ignorant and edgy, making it less clear what he (she?) means.
>>217005258>The Third ManLooks cool. Thanks. I like 2001 regardless of you weak association.
OP, do you not see the parallel between the band of hominids learning of violence and the the modern day race between the biological and the technological? What could you say to contextualize what the winner of the situation gains or ascends to?
>>217004614Its not super deep, it just has some interesting themes about consciousness, reason and evolution as well as an excellent early depiction of artificial intelligence. Aside from that the special effects are incredibly gorgeous and it benefits from Kubrick's talent as a director and cinematographer.Its a film not a book, how much depth do you really expect? Did it get you thinking? Then it did its job.
>>217006979If you think the resonant pinnacle of this film is in the editing prowess and not the themes, I think you are a pseud.
Sorry, you need to be really smart to understand this film.
>>217007120Favorite of his films?
>>217007134I you think you can understand what I think then you're a midwit!
>>217005236But why would the world's best living directors widely consider it the best directed film ever made? When directors get a bone for something, it means the story is told with shots and not words. So guess what, I hope you're autistic or schizophrenic because 2001 comes some assembly required. When I watched this in school, the teacher showed us a bit from 2010 to explain that Hal was programmed to kill the astronauts after finding the monolith.
It's kino (the dumb baby part kind of ruins it though)
>>217007120Technically, it both. Clarke worked on the novelization at the same time as he and Kubrick made the script. It's why the movie ends with the Space Baby and the novel ends with the Space Baby unarming all nukes in the world.
>>217007199He engaged the proto-tool and evolved.
>>217004614Howard Stern hates this movie too.
>>217007154>Favorite of his films?For me its 1: Dr. Strangelove,2: 20013: The Killing4: Paths of Glory5: A Clockwork Orange6: Full Metal Jacket7: The Shining8: SpartacusI haven't seen Barry Lyndon, Eyes Wide Shut or Lolita yet so consider them unranked.
do I have to be into hindu young boys to fully appreciate movie?
>>217007366No.
>>217007274eeeh, are you 21 or younger?
>>217007120See was that hard? It's not particularly deep. Just a good film.
>>217007198>But why would the world's best living directors widely consider it the best directed film ever made?Emperor's new clothes.
>>217004614Amazing. Not a single interesting comment about 2001. This piece of shit truly is the most overrated film of all time.
>>217007382I'm 40. What do you object to?I like black comedy, political thrillers and war movies and I particularly like George C. Scott and Sterling Hayden so Dr. Strangelove is one of my favorite films. I also really like film noir so The Killing is higher up on my list than it is for most people.
>>217007376why not?
>>217007501I object to you. Your list is bad and not even Kubrick himself would approve of it.
>>217004760Hmmm your emotional reply lessens the credence of your argument
>>217007500It really is something isn't it? That is really the case with most of these "classics" just sheep following commands because their film professor said so.
>>217006979Best attempt itt so far but I haven’t scrolled all the way down
>>217007906What is bad about it? 2001 and Strangelove being top 2 makes sense, and Kubrick would definitely agree. Has the biggest themes among his films.
Lol baby ass thread. He broke ground in cimetography. You're literally meant to watch Marvel movies zoomie fagstick
>>217007906Nta but rude and pointless reply
for me its the sexual symbolism of the penetrative design of the spaceships..they are all prolongative in their form, they have little people inside them which splurg out at times and they all enter black space, off and on, in and out. it's like Kubrick is made a porno movie for naturally bio-aclined proto-scientists
>>217007929>>217007937nah, ACO, The Shining and EWS would top Kubricks list. then FMJ would follow. then perhaps Dr.S and 2001. Barry Lyndon next together with Paths. then the rest in the dumpster (not nearly on the level he'd like them to be)why? because as he got older he made better movies, simple as that. why isn't FMJ better then the others then? because sometimes you fail and the stuff you make is flawed (same with Barry Lyndon). happy pappy?
>>217007937I am the anon he replied to and its a lame attempt at a troll. I enjoy a good troll; but I don't get the point of just telling someone they're stupid. Like I'm not enough of a newfag to give a fuck and there's not really any sport to it. Its just maybe griefing someone for no reason, like you said pointless.For me a quality troll is convincing someone that you're the weirdo. Like if he'd told me that only homosexuals like Dr. Strangelove because its full of jewish mind control subliminal messages to make you queer. That could have been a fun troll. But just telling me my list is bad? What's the point?
>>217007962I've tried to decipher this image for 5 minutes but I'm lost! WTF am I looking at here? What is it supposed to symbolize?
>>217008005>sometimes you fail and the stuff you make is flawedThat's definitely EWS, really boring flick. His best films are objectively in this order: 2001, The Shining, A Clockwork Orange, and Dr. Stangelove. The ones with the most to say and most rewatchable. Everything else he did was mid to shit.Your taste is actually laughably bad. lol
>>217008096>That's definitely EWS, really boring flick.I've been browsing /tv/ a lot and EWS and the shining are the biggest memeable movies of his. Next is perhaps 2001 maybe ACO, then FMJ and Barry Lyndon. Further down Dr Strangelove. Rarely Lolita. Almost never see Paths or Spartacus talked bout here. But sure, who am I to tell you what's interesting or not, you do what you do. I don't care.
>>217004614It's not he's just a jew so everyone sucks him off
>>217004614>Can midwits here explain what's so deep about it?Can midwits here explain what's so deep about posting things like this? I mean I know this is an interactive magazine for emotionally stunted people, but yeesh.
