Best Bond coming through
>>217007638definitely a top 5 bond movie
>>217007638George Lazenby could have portrayed James Bond all throughout the 1970s and into the 1980s, possibly a more serious version of Roger Moore, and making Diamonds Are Forever a little more serious than Sean Connery's movie went.
>>217008245Moore was a terrible bond.
>>217008253Indian post.
>>217008253you're a faggot
>>217008253Roger Moore was the right man for the times, particularly the general state of cinema at the time and the scripts he was given. He was great as the main James Bond of the 1970s into the early 1980s, but got too old by the mid-1980s.
>>217008493>>217008459>>217008272I was merely pretending. Im rewatching all of the Bonds
>>217007638Forced contrarian opinion. If Sean Connery was as the lesser known bond who only did one movie you would be saying he was the best. These fake takes are just a personality substitute for you
>>217008736I unironically like Dalton best
>>217008757See >>217008736
Whats the difference between Thunderball and Never Say Never Again?
>>217008493>Roger Moore was the right man for the timesAbsolutely.
savalas made a shite villain.
>>217009241>savalasI would say he was one of the best depictions of Lex Luthor before Gene Hackman and Michael Rosenbaum. He just happens to do it in a Bond film.
>>217009241nah he was great
I knew nothing about Bond up until recently and i am about to enter the Brosnan era, but to me they were all good Bonds up until this pointNow the movies are decent to good at best, i haven't seen a great Bond movie yet, but he has been portrayed fairly well by everyone
