[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_9124.jpg (61 KB, 1170x362)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
What’s the point of shit like this, everyone that didn’t see the interview will think that they saw your real tits in the movie anyway. Just commit to the bit or make way for someone that will. Dumb bitch.
>>
>>217008156
She's been fully naked several times before. They had to match her tits to Demi Moore. It would've been obvious to anyone who's seen her naked before that they were fake.
>>
Frogs worked overtime to make Qualley look like a bombshell.
>>
Those didn't really look real, sorry Jean-Pierre
>>
>>217008156
Are you a fucking moron? Anyone who has looked at Margaret Qualley’s body before Substance immediately knew that shit was fake. It wasn’t just the tits, qualley does not have that buxom hourglass in real life
>>
So she can preserve her dignity, she wasn't AKCHULLY naked, misogynistic pigs!



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.