Can Star Trek ever make a comeback?
>>217015757only after WW3 and the world gets "corrected"
>>217016028which will happen right after you get your dick wet
>>217015757Not as long as subversive jews remain in charge, so >>217016028
>>217016131
>>217015757So long as there are fans that remember the good star trek (TNG to ENT) a new, good star trek series has potential. They did kinda ruin the immediate post-TNG era with PIC, but it's far less egregious than what the sequels did to star wars so it's still salvageable. Star trek was always a setting as much as a story, and that setting is still worth telling stories in.
>>217016172>discounting TOSDude.>a new, good star trek series has potentialA new, good *anything* has potential. And there won't be one.>They did kinda ruin the immediate post-TNG era with PICKinda ruin? *Kinda* ruin? And just with Picard?>so it's still salvageableBy whom? Who's your saviour of Trek who (a) has or at least recognises talent, (b) cares about the franchise, (c) doesn't want to keep churning out girlboss-and-nog-filled feelings-in-shiny-corridors slop, and (d) won't be forced to?
>>217015757This OP made me kek. I will save it.
>>217015757Does anyone have the version of the original image with the ingroup/outgroup heat map?