[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


kino that only gets better over time
>>
0/10 bait. Try harder.
>>
File: podrace.jpg (196 KB, 1560x780)
196 KB
196 KB JPG
Sound mogs you
>>
>>217020082
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2PDTVmcM9c
>>
>>217020027
Certainly not that.the og theatrical cut of new hope remains the best star was ever was
>>
>>217020027
takes a giant shit in your mouth
>>
The prequels are great
>>
>"At last we will reveal ourselves to the Jedi. At last we will have...revenge"
Unfathomably based + kino.
>>
Trash
>>
>>217020315
i didn't say it was better than the original
i just said it was kino
>>
>>217021199
>it was movie
>>
>>217020027
It's certainly the prequel I've watched the most. Jar Jar and the kid never bothered me. RotS is a better movie, but TPM is a more enjoyable watch, IMO.
I can't even remember the last time I watch Attack of the Clones.
>>
>>217021690
>RotS is a better movie, but TPM is a more enjoyable watch, IMO
it's a fair take
>>
This ruined my life
>>
File: 1656554225790.jpg (653 KB, 1316x752)
653 KB
653 KB JPG
Just dropped in to point out you guys have to frame every prequel thread as the movies not being bad and you're still seething about friend simulator videos that came out 16 years ago. If the movies were actually good you would have moved on by now and the eceleb videos wouldn't have got so much traction that they still live rent-free after more than a decade and a half.

Cry, seethe, ignore the fact you feel the need to continuously defend them instead of enjoying them. Just remember that you're low IQ for taking Star Wars this seriously in the first place.

Do with this information what you will.
>>
>>217020027
The other two look like video games, so I guess it wins by default for having physical sets
>>
>>217022916
2 and 3 have plenty of physical sets as well
what phantom had over 2 and 3 is it was still shot on film while 2 was shot on a first-gen digital camera which is why its cgi aged poorly in some shots
3 was shot on a 2nd or 3rd gen digital which is why the cgi looks much better
>>
File: 3.png (746 KB, 910x732)
746 KB
746 KB PNG
>the physical sets
>>
File: Untitled.png (3.05 MB, 1600x1040)
3.05 MB
3.05 MB PNG
>I'll Try Flipping, that's a Good Trick!
>>
>>217023060
I don't know what they did exactly. But those Naboo palace and Tatooine village scenes actually looked real (for the most part) while everything in 2 and 3 looked like dudes in front of green screens.
>>
>>217020027
Rewatched it and had my wife watch it for the first time and it was honest to god excruciating. The cool parts were few and far between and the acting was so much worse than I remembered. Gungan battle still held up but outside of that it was grim.
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (97 KB, 1280x720)
97 KB
97 KB JPG
>>217023185
they were still using real world props in e1
>>
>>217020027
>Still causes seethe to this day
Basedquels
>>
>>217023185
2 and 3 utilized a lot of miniatures due to the fact that the locations simply don't exist and building full-scale sets would be impossible and cost tons more
that is why they were dudes on green screens, but again some shots look better than others

>Naboo palace and Tatooine village scenes actually looked real
because they are real, you can visit them right now
naboo palace in italy
they built a full ass village for mos espa and then ditched it in the desert lol
>>
File: Actual shot form TPM.png (574 KB, 1280x720)
574 KB
574 KB PNG
>>217023061
Kek



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.