Why aren't people having existential crisises about film and tv being 100% over now?There is NO stopping ai "slop" no matter how much shaming it's users and followers anyone does.Everyone you even complain to on these kinds of sites, or in the comments of videos will end up being ai.It's hilarious. Content and the people watching content will be the creators. No more 3 parties, no studios, no writers, no actors, just you. Your personal Dreamworld is now reality.
>>217064021Because no one cares, and the fact you care so much means you're probably a virgin who should have sex. People who have sex regularly don't obsess over stuff like this.
>>217064021It's prohibited from depicting rape scenes, we still have to do them ourselves. Cinema isn't going anywhere.
https://youtu.be/eJu8rYLjNak?si=pDaTkHh5PkM05EhEActually GREAT quality fan stuff is MONTHS away.Just look at this.It sucks. But once refined it's over.
>>217064061Only troons say shit like this.
>>217064021that was kino
>>217064021With the gatekeepers out of the way, we’ll enter a new golden age of entertainment. I’m glad you’re noticing this too OP.
https://youtu.be/UytgD39PXoQ?si=W8eEMqDqLeSBvGZcImagine witnessing this, be at awe, but have to be forced to hate because of your philosophy
>>217064021Picard has the wrong jacket
>>217064021>>217064079AI can't beat Hollywood because no-one will pay to see this shit
>>217064133its being held back so much. the normies have completely taken the side of people trying to slow crawl this tech out so they can get as much as possible.
>>217064021>3 seconds shots of stiff characters copy pasted from various moviesLiterally the same shit AI was doing 2 years ago. It looks better now, but there is obviously a threshold AI """creativity""" can't overcome.
>>217064213Hollywood dies BECAUSE it will be free moron.Paid netflix troon nog propaganda or shit people actually want to see made by people who don't care if they make money or not.
>>217064021>Picard in yellowDamn AI is still shit
Saar redeem the AI it is beauty beyond your wildest dreams saaaaaar
>>217064021AI costs too much money to render anything longer than 15 seconds. Cope. It's hit a wall.
>>217064021It cost probably hundreds or thousands of dollars to generate that slop and the AI resources that went into it still operated at a loss. This notion that "Your personal Dreamworld is now reality" is completely false. Nobody is willing to pay for this shit and it's all being propped up by phantom money swirling around the proverbial toilet. You can't generated video on consumer hardware of that fidelity and they won't let you anyway (already ram prices have skyrocketed). Enjoy a life of subscription slavery and until then the jeets and ai trannies will be spamming OP's sort of propaganda until the money runs out or they they their way and you'll own nothing.
>>217064298>it will be free How will it be free? Lol.
>>217064133You could make an independent film tomorrow if you really wanted to. You won’t though, because you have no drive or ambition or even ideas. So instead you dream up some fantasy where the heckin based AI companies will help you defeat le evil pozzed Hollywood Jews. You are retarded beyond belief.
>>217064322Nothing will stop it.Saying anyone using AI are pajeets will not stop it.Pajeets are the ones doing the shitty cgi for all the blockbusters now.I'd rather have AI do the special effects than a pajeet.
>>217064021>what if [recognizable character] from [X franchise] met [recognizable character] from [Y franchise]This is like the worst excesses of referential slop cinema turned up to eleven.
>>217064021>a bunch of characters walking forwardWOOw siir this is amazting they are walking forwards and some are sitting and do nothing this is magic wooooow sir this is wow
>>217064021Stop having "existential crisises" over the products you consume.
>>217064133Even if legislators try to stop it by blocking it from using existing people and IPs, other countries will just push forward with all the pirated content in the world as the basis.>>217064394I imagine that isn't really too big of a hurdle. It's just a difficult for current video algorithms. What you need is a system with many agents in which agent 1 will generate content, then another agent 2 will verify it as good and forward it as basis for the next generations back to agent 1 or maybe agent 3 who is good with continuations. You need a bit more complex algorithm like this and you can generate hours. Currently it's doing something pretty crazy under the hood since it has a hard time keeping even seconds consistent, meanwhile we can feed it an image and it can instantly generate a scene out of that, so for some reason they aren't really generating continuing scenes out of their own content yet. This kind of multiagents already handle text generation much better than before.
>>217064298Netflix has a 25% profit margin. OpenAI's losses are triple its revenue.
>Nothing will stop it.>Saying anyone using AI are pajeets will not stop it.>Pajeets are the ones doing the shitty cgi for all the blockbusters now.>I'd rather have AI do the special effects than a pajeet.
AI is already being used in SFX workflows to make things like masking faster, or to help de-age actors. That's the real use case for AI. But this idea that in two more years(TM) you'll be able to generate your own movie is just a jeet fantasy.
>>217064298>shit people actually want to seestranger things is literally the biggest show in the west right now theres even characters from it in OPs video, youre just doing the ugly propaganda for free now
Can't wait to direct my Upskirt Opera. It's gonna be a three hour long panty shot, I've been working on it for years and we finally have the technology to achieve my vision
The Iq of the general posters on here is so incredibly low, the lack of foresight some of you "people" have is incredible. It's okay, I know most of you are 12 years old though.
>>217064021Cinema will become freer as it getx rid of bloated budgets, immense box office expectations, infantilization, ratings etc. Authors will thrive unfettered
>>217064021We've all known this was coming for a while now. Hollywood is out of ideas and has nothing but nostalgia for better times. Using AI to make new stories with proven IPs was the logical next step. AI generated characters don't age or demand salaries. They can work unlimited hours without stopping. Why would Hollywood ever go back to humans?
>>217064021i was so ready for bale to punch anniston in the face
>>217064021>2026 and we already have jeets telling us AI is definitely going to take over everything THIS time
>>217064317AI can't do correct Starfleet ranks.
Who gives a fuck?The faster Hollywood dies out the better
>>217064021because AI and worthless dumb humans are identical. Humans are also just trained AI. There is no difference, half the people in this soulless world full of soulless people literally don't even have conscious thoughts going on in their brains, they are more like donkeys or monkeys. To then complain about how AI is soulless is like a joke. Humans are psychopathic and soulless too. We get some actually good, soulful content every few years whether there is AI or not.
>>217064579Fuck you dad it's not our fault you married such a giant bitch
>>217064322Do not mocke me with your Indian racism. You are being offered ascenion into Godhood and yet you joke? Be proud of the luddite that you am, and remain in the past, enslaved to things like time skill constrants and copyright and paying peasants, saving so much money for the Creators.
>>217064591>Hollywood is out of ideas and has nothing but nostalgia for better times. >Using AI to make new stories with proven IPs
>>217064298you think it's "hollywood vs AI" like it's a sport, when they're both tech giants and hollywood are owned by the same investors and giant asset managers like blackrock, vanguard, etc. the game is rigged, my man.
>>217064591>hollywood is shit because they.... uhhhh... THEYRE OUT OF IDEAS AND NOSTALGIABAITING OKAY?????>so like, we need AI because we can be better and uhhhh we can USE THE IPS FROM HOLLYWOOD TO MAKE SOMETHING HERE LOOK AT THIS PICTURE OF AI SCOOBY DOO AND STAR TREK MAN!!!
>>217064061>People who have sex regularly are hylics trapped in a cycle of rebirth who don’t care about what’s real or fakeSounds about right.
>>217064021Get over it, your Patreon isnt worth supporting even before AI
>>217064021>movies are when all the characters from my favorite franchises are togetheryou are like a child playing with action figures
>>217064671If Gupreet could read this he would be very upset
This people are performative conservatives, eventually all big studios will use tons of ai shortcuts but they will find ways to rationalize it in order to keep consooming
>>217064591Is this post and the attached image a joke?
>>217064532Just 10 trillion more dollars and another few terawatts bro and we'll generate 30-second videos for free!
>>217064021It's been over for a long time, man. No one cares.
>>217064021They will only let people use cucked versions of AI. Did that bit not cross your mind yet? Not everyone is a basement dweller who knows how to get around the blocks and make AI porn or whatever. It probably wont even let you make a movie with a white cast only, only the elite and the ultra determined perverts will be able to create whatever they want.
>>217064021only indians with 10IQ and retarded 3rd world monkeys would engage with this dogshit
>>217064579Instead of seething about your supposedly superior iq, please tell all the plebs how these feature length movies will be generated for each of the 8 billion people on earth and all for free?
>the people who are too dumb and lazy to make their own edits in paint or gimp are going to make their own feature length films using grok
>>217064615Oh but you're different, right? Lmao.
>>217064835You don't get it, bro. Literally anybody can be Steven Spielberg now.
>>217064812I don't know if that guy was even arguing your point, and it's obviously not going to be free, but for 5 bucks a Chinese company will be right happy to give you a version of Fight Club where everyone is a woman with double Ds.
Some bigwig at Meta recently made news by saying that since AI has gotten so good, that authenticity is going to be what really sets creators apart. This is obviously very true. People get tired of AI slop and want to see something real. If you think about it, it's been this way with TV and film for al long time. Hollywood tentpoles still make big numbers, but the indie scene has been where it's at since at least the 80s. The lowest common denominator stuff will still rake in the most cash, but at the end of the day, only plebs really give a shit about and take seriously that kind of cultural riff-raff.
my normie friends are unironically sharing AI "comedy skits" in the group chat. they legit don't care.
>>217064021I don’t care, because the rate at which the work film-making gets handed over to AI is directly, inversely proportional to the rate at which I stop watching film in favor of reading books and finding contentment in simple existence within / as a part of nature. Speaking of which, I’ve got gardening to do and there are hawks singing outside.
Just gotta wait for the current generation of AI haters to die out.Unfortunately, we're part of that generation but once the new generation grows up with AI content, AI will be fully accepted and integrated with a few hold outs, of course.
>>217064532>other countriesIndia>1 or maybe 3 agentsPajeets
>>217064941>normie friends>group chatGrr! This is a no friends zone.
>>217064021>Why aren't people having existential crisises about film and tv being 100% over now?Ai slop signals hope for every uncreative person that they'll one day be able to have their own personally-curated kinos in any genre/topic, free from the meddling of execs.After the past 10 years, everyone is completely numb to existential crises. Seriously. This is the age of apathy.Boomers hoard wealth. Anyone younger than 45 will never be able to retire comfortably. 99% of everyone not born to a wealthy household will never be able to afford a house.We're on the brink of ww3, nevermind however many civil wars and the destruction of democracy in general.And THEN you've got ai. And before you worry about the death of film/tv, you've got the death of humanity as a whole as the singularity rapidly approaches and we're just hoping that whoever hits that threshhold first designs a benevolent ai because we're unironically at risk of a literal skynet wiping out everyone (and a lot of the billionaires in control are unironically so arrogant that they think they could design a superintelligence skynet that they could control who would only exterminate their enemies).Only after all that is the fear of ai slop ruining media a concern for the average person. And like I said, most people consider it a fun novelty that might one day let them make cool stuff out of boredom with minimal effort.
>>217064947AI should hurry up and ruin the internet too so we can all be free of this shitposting curse>>217064996Making something more intelligent than ourselves is so obviously the great filter of the fermi paradox at this point
>>217064950AI is definitely the moment where millennials became decoupled from youth culture
>the star wars we were deniedhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_Ugr_O0-8k
because when AI finally hits a level where generation of content is trivial, hollywood would've been dead for at least 20 years. as everything hollywood has done since 2007 has been a performance to create the false impression, in the minds of stockholders, since the companies are all publicly traded, that their business model, selling access to individual pieces of static media, wasn't completely obsolete for a dozen reasons. not least of which is the undeniable fact there's basically zero competent filmmakers working in hollywood.
>>217064021Only jeets actually like AI slop
>>217065153the "millennial generation" itself is split directly in half between people who grew up with ubiquitous internet and people who didn't.
Why netflix team has a bunch of non-named squid games goons in their team and Paramount is full of IP main guys? this is cleary a fraudulent game, Netflix rigged his way to the finals by bribery
>>217065197this maymay is based in chatgpt usage by country. read: its mostly jeets using it to cheat for various reasons.
>>217064021>IndiaThis is the most Indian thing I've seen today.
>>217065346 Einstein & a Indian sitting next to each other on a long flight...Einstein says:"Let's play a game...I will ask you a question,if you don't know the answer,you pay me only $5andif I don't know the answer,I will pay you $500..."Einstein asks the first question:What's the distance from the Earth to the Moon...?Indian doesn't say a word,Reaches his pocket,Pulls out a $5...Now...It's the indian turn...He asks Einstein:What goes up a hill with 3 legsandcomes down on 4 legs..?Einstein searches the net and asks all his smart friends...After an hour he gives Indian $500...Einstein going nuts and asks:Well...so what goes up a hill with three legs and comes down with four..?Indian reaches his pocket and gives Einstein $5...Einstein fainted.....
>>217065153For me it was Tik Tok
>>217065570Tons of millennials loved Vine and that was the same thing
But we can stop it if we act mad and post stuff like “hire real artists!” every time a studio gets caught using AI
>>217065647you're confusing browns with millennials.
>>217064444Quad quads of fucking TRVKE
>>217064021Because IP law in the US is a fucking joke and companies have been horrific stewards of IP for the past decade. I would absolutely rather watch some warhammer autist’s AI prompt over the absolute trash slop being made today. You’ll see a slew of top tier prompt film makers come out of the crucible and we’ll get kino again. It’s basically how late night is dead and everyone watches asmongold or ishowspeed
>>217064401
>>217065836"prompting" is only a "skill" because of the fledgling nature of the technology.
>>217064553Right now is the shittiest AI will ever be. We’ve come a long way in 2 years from Will Smith eating spaghetti
>>217065555>What goes up a hill with 3 legs>and>comes down on 4 legs..?Me after edging for 3 hours on top of that hill
>>217064021Decades of cgslop made everyone apathetic.
>>217064401>all those blue checkmarksImagine paying to use Twitter.
>>217064807Foreign countries and home computers exist. You can already run LLMs from personal computers
>>217065836why do you think normie retards getting access to AI will give us tons of great flicks instead of even more retarded garbage
>>217065929Any kind of specific output is going to require some kind of input from the creator. A lot of people don’t know what they want so someone with good taste is going to create better bespoke content. My biggest immediate concern with AI is it coukd cause the information death of humanity. Automated processes coild easily drown out human voices on the internet. Truth and opinions drowned out by noise, disinformation, etc. Some real Butlerian Jihad type shit
>>217066078No one will watch the normie garbage, but there will certainly be some cream that rises to the top. It could spawn a new type of auteur
>>217064401Jesus wept.I sometimes used ChatGPT to fix grammar and make pics for trolling, but “AI ''artists”" are supposedly hard-working? Paying for ten fucking AIs?What the fuck is wrong with these subhumans?P.S.The pics AI makes are inferior to memes 4channers who know how to use Photoshop or Paint make. I just can’t draw.
>>217066138anon. no one is going to pay you to prompt for them.
>>217064021>>217064079>>217064110>>217064133>>217064163SAAAAAAAAR
>>217064021It's over for Hollywood because I'd pay tickets for this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhttpyuQhA4
>>217064686he said its better for hollywood, not that is better for youlearn some reading comprehension, geez, its like you are incapable abstract thought
>>217064021>just a bunch of characters from different franchises standing around, doing nothing>WAAAOOW THIS IS SO MINDBLOWING, HOLLYWOOD IS FINISHED
>>217066240This is the same shit as those Harry Potter/Batman/Matrix.. Balenciaga videos that were popular that one week two years ago. Character staring blankly at camera for a couple of seconds, then cut before AI completely shits itself. Sure it looks better now, but AI had clearly reached it's limit.
How strict will the laws be for AI movies?Let’s say hypothetically I create a feature length lesbian prison rape movie using all the hottest women from cinema and my personal life will I inevitably be arrested?
>>217066078People said the same shit when digital cameras came out. Lo and behold lowering the barrier to entry allows more people to give it a try
>>217066227No one pays to watch asmongold either yet he’s paid millions. Funny that
>>217064298>>217064444>>217064532>>217064590>>217064591SAAAAAAAAR
>>217064021Link to the original? I wanna hear this with the audio.
>>217064021Someone needs to make a parody of this with /tv/ meme characters like CIA guy, Emma Myers, etc
that was the brownest webm i’ve ever seen
>>217066840The IP laws around this are fascinating. This shit is pulling data from IP across the board including people’s personal shit. IP owners bitch and moan while simultaneously using the tech. A real argument coild be made this shit should be nationalized or treated like a utility.
>>217064021What the fuck are you talking about? It's been over for 11 years. Woke shit killed it long before AI got a chance to.
>>217066899I hate this so fucking much
>>217066899I (>>217064590) was defending authors going back to personal projects, not AI dumbass
>>217064687sex is more real than any media, AI or not.
>>217064021Like others have said, only Indians and other low-IQ people like tiny babies and very old elderly people enjoy AI slop.It's just 3 minute songs and youtube shorts & facebook reels or whatever their short format is called, and it's all it'll ever be.There's no way you could make a fully AI movie and if it did it would cost way more than just shooting it with actors in front of a green screen and a human director etc like any other 250+ million dollar movie is being done these days. nevermind small budget movies just shot on location in the real world.And then even if producing a single AI movie doesn't completely bankrupt and ruin the planet, what if the movie is just surprisingly average medciore capeslop and it flops at the box office? As movies do.
>>217065999What do you mean when you say foreign countries exist? Using a VPN to download a non cucked AI programme? Or a privellage for people who dont live in authoritarian shitholes like the UK like me? Genuinely curious.
>>217066899Stay mad you will never create KINOhttps://ifunny.co/video/tiktok-green-screen-video-joelferns-230-helping-my-brothers-out-FTOo0iIQ8
>>217064950>>217064708>>217065183>>217065258>>217065952SAAAAAAAAAR
>>217067187See how you are wrong?https://youtu.be/eDu_tD4MAMw
>>217064021>>217048691If it's such a done deal then why are you trying so hard to convince people?
>>217064021the sad thing is how the industry became such slop long before AI was introduced. in that light, i don't understand the desperate guarding. it would have been a battle worth fighting if it hadn't already become a cesspool of laziness and incompetence.
>>217064021>nowSlop was already the norm long before genAI.
>you dont understand, this ai stuff is the future bro, look at this!!! >links shortform content
>>217067252what is the purpose of having 2/3rds of the video being the two characters just sitting there doing an idle animation? seriously.
>>217064021>Why aren't people having existential crisises about film and tv being 100% over now?Because its not. I like playing around with generative AI, and its not replacing anything. Sure, you can stitch together a bunch of random 10 second clips of people slowly walking towards the camera, but try to do something more complex than that, or longer than that, and it just turns into a mess. And the only way to get a longer video is to just stitch together those 10 second clips, using the end frame as the start frame for the next generation and then just hope it manages to be consistent with the last 10 second clip (it wont).
>>217067252You expect that slop to take over traditional human movies?Didn't watch it, btw. The thumbnail and title alone tells me all I need to know - it's a pale imitation of real human slop.That's all AI is.
>>217067553>try to do something more complex than that, or longer than that, and it just turns into a messJust like how it can't make hands with the proper amount of fingers, right? Every time AI makes a huge leap in an incredibly short period of time, it's alwas>okay, but it couldn't possibly improve past this so don't worryAnd then a few months later whatever nitpicks they had are non existent. You're lying to yourself to feel better, anon. It's okay tp admit it.
>>217066891you realize, of course, ecelebs will be the first to completely die when AI starts going mainstream, right? the only "people" consuming eceleb regurgitation are third worlders and progressively smaller children.
>>217067553>its not replacing anything.between it and onlyfans, porn stars have completely ceased to exist. the girls left doing "professional" pornography are absolute fucking hounds or clearly fetish cases like bonnie blue
>>217067767Even the most modern models still make hotdog fingers and bad anatomy. You also have a hard ceiling when it comes to training new models. You've already scraped the entire internet and human history for training data, any new data sets are polluted with AI slop, which is bad to use as input because using synthetic data just makes the model more incestuous and self pruning.
>>217067767AI videos have always been in short segment format. They might get the number of fingers right and look much more realistic in genreral, but it's been over two years and video length limitation is still there.
>>217067942anon. there is no "hard ceiling." current models are being trained off ai generated content, with the artifacts and flaws being labeled as bad, undesirable, whatever, and those flaws being negative prompted.not only is this currently happening, its been happening for over two years. because unlike you, the people working on model training aren't retarded and don't chime in on subjects they have zero understanding of
>>217067145but not more meaningful
>>217064061fpbp
>>217068034the "video length limitation" is a question of what can be efficiently generated with consumer hardware, due to error rates being what they are and prompt refining being a process of generate, adjust prompt, generate, adjust prompt, etc, etc.
>>217064021I think Netflix is a bigger threat than AI because AI still hasn't solved the editing/length problem, no one has the patience to generate serious media that isn't just porn/shit post. Browse I threads, no one has an actual project that's interesting, just a toy. meanwhile Netflix has a real chance of breaking Hollywood's back with streaming
>>217067210The point is there is no way they’re going to be able to restrict this technology once it’s scaled down enough. People already have LLMs that can show you how to cook meth and make bombs (not something I’ve ever done before a glowie on here gets excited). If it can be done someone will figure out a way, especially if there’s an incentive to do it even if it’s something as simple as clout
>>217067711Ah I see your err... "artwork" is your argument? Very good sir very good haha
>>217064021If I was concerned, I'd be concerned. I'm not. AI is some machine dream bullshit. Just look at it real carefully. If you like it, good for you. All I see is a machine imagining machine things.
>>217067553I’m convinced these are 12 year olds making posts like this. They cannot conceive of continued innovation despite demonstrable breakneck advances in this specific thing and offer no technical explanation for why such future innovations are impossible.
This shit is so cringe
>>217068136don't even start on how much ai "loli/shota" is being generated. and practically none of it is the plausible deniability of "ackshually im a hebophile" stuff, its all clearly prepubescents. but that's probably just people trying to manufacture a justification for getting ai generation banned entirely... for everyone else.
>>217068186people with iqs under 80 really can't even comprehend a hypothetical and people with iqs under 110 can barely map a concept. and that's the majority of people.
>>217067786Soon.
>>217064079This obviously has some rough edges and little quirks all over it but anyone that watches this and does not see the potential to disrupt the entire film industry within the next decade is bullshitting you to your face.
>>217068157no, my argument is my argument. the wojaks is just for fun
Just 2 more weeks :)
>>217064021YET THEY ARE STILL HOLDING BACK PORNJUST LET ME MAKE MY NICHE FETISH PORN, I'LL THROW AS MUCH MONEY AS YOU WANT AT THE AII TRY 100 VARIATIONS OF THE AI PROMPT AND IT NEVER FOLLOWS MY INSTRUCTIONS AND THEN I RUN OUT OF CREDITS WITH BLUE BALLSI JUST WANT THE WOMAN TO WALK UP TO ME, SMILE, AND THEN START GROWING TO 12 FEET TALL, HOW FUCKING HARD IS THAT
>>217068283is what all the deniers have.>it'll cap>it'll plateau>training efficiency will decrease>power requirements will become prohibitiveetc, etc, in just two more weeks.
>>217068186Anon, I am a person who actually uses generative AI for fun, and who keeps mildly informed in the actual research done on it, and with a passing knowledge of how it actually works. You don't get better models without more data, and if you've already used all the data then there's not another well to draw from. You're poisoned by tech bro nonsense in thinking that the line will keep going up, and the reality is that the technology is going to plateau.
>>217067786kek it's the exact opposite. the independent creators with low overhead that you disparage as "ecelebs" are going to be just fine because you can't fake authenticity and personality with AI. it's the corporate entertainers who will be made irrelevant.
>>217068288>not locally generating
>>217068368>you can't fake authenticity and personalityanon. that's not what the "people" who consume eceleb vomit are consuming eceleb vomit for. as evidenced by how eceleb is, unto itself, a personality.
>>217068288Yeah I can usually generate any image I want, but I am just never sure how to prompt for video. It can't really follow a narrative. I'd say try to focus on the person growing in size relative to the surroundings. AI doesn't know what an inch, or centimeter, or a foot is, so its best to just describe size relative to other characters, objects, or just using generic "giant/normal/small/tiny" terms.
>>217064021Good morning sir!
>>217068367You’re a partially informed hobbyist by your own admission. Why do you assume the only way to innovate a technology is to do more of the same? Has that been true for literallt any major tech advance ever?
>>217068411>that's not what the "people" who consume eceleb vomit are consuming eceleb vomit for.yeah it is. your argument makes no sense and is disconnected from reality.>as evidenced by how eceleb is, unto itself, a personality.buddy, have you watched a hollywood press tour?
>>217068288the main issue is most training is in effort to avoid artifacts like that. so you need to use an extremely specific and completely unmistakable term for it in your prompt, also include an indication for when that prompt should happen. no clue if non-local generators allow for the python level code prompts.
>>217068367>tech broopinion discarded
>>217068367Those are buzzwords that don't really relate to the issue you provided which is the time limit. That's just due to limits of current algorithms and has nothing to do with what they are inspired by.
>>217068498anon. only an eceleb could be this deluded. parasocialization isn't going to remain a one-sided phenomenon.
>>217068496>You’re a partially informed hobbyist by your own admission.Vs you. Uninformed Samesh from Bangladesh. No gen, no opinion.
>>217064021people born after 1980 are people of the perpetual crisis and existential void.what will come will be as shitty or even worse,as always.deal with it and move on.
>>217068367>You don't get better models without more data, and if you've already used all the data then there's not another well to draw from.i know if only there was a way to... generate... more data...
>>217064021>be a human>perform some action>wtf why did my action create consequent occurrences?Modern humans are essentially breeding out intelligence and individual capability for large scale "swarm" species traits.
>>217064021I would have made Superman shrug off the rope restraints easily however at that moment Hermione Granger sits on his lap. Is that a good edit?
>>217067145But if I personally don't have sex, how is it any more real than the goings-on inside the television or on the movie screen?If all I ever experience of sex is second-hand, then what makes it real to me, experientially and by extension, existentially.
>>217068644>generate... more data...Anon, they've taken all of the images and video they could get from the collected works of humanity that they could get their hands on.Any "New" data sets are a drop in the bucket, and they're tainted with AI output. Which as I mentioned, isn't great training data either because it just makes your model self prune and look more like a generic AI generated image. I'm not saying it wont get better, I'm saying that people are going to be able to prompt a coherent movie that wouldn't feel like a schizophrenic nightmare is a long long way off. It would also require so much babysitting and fine tuning that its just cheaper, easier to just shoot a movie. The ways you can use AI in production aren't going to be the ways that retarded indians and tech bros hyping a bubble claim it is.
>>217064021well I'm interested in art, not "content", so this doesn't really affect me.
>>217068804>and they're tainted with AI outputanon just re-read >>217068062. you are just stupid as fuck. there isn't going to be a "data crash" or "content taint" or whatever you fantasize is going to happen to put an end to the dreaded AI menace. the "hands" problem was fixed by generating fuckloads of "AI hands," labeling it "ai hands," and then negative prompting "ai hands."
