Was he a good king?
>>217079094Yes.
in that he had a lasting influence and greatly improved his country's standing during his reign absolutely
>>217079094IRL he was very effectual which in the Middle Ages meant he was a good king. It’s not like today where a tyrannical king or a king who commits massacres of the people he is waging war against is considered to be a bad king because muh morality. Being ineffectual and weak was about the worst thing you could be as a Medieval king.
>>217079094'A man does good business when he rids himself of a turd'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjFzHXj_U3k
>>217079094damn right
The media of his day savaged him due to his homophobia.
>>217079094King Edward expelled the jewsBASED
>>217079094He was a based king.
>>217079094the best
>>217079094no he was a jew
>>217079753jews are still there. so he failed or more likely lied about doing such
>>217081006>jews are still there.they keep being allowed back1 0 9
>>217081033allowed is an exaggeration I'm guessing, nobody sane would allow it. they keep importing themselves
>>217079094He threw a fag out thru the window. That's based in my book.
>>217079094>wanted to unite the nation>stop the scots from entering civil war>founded parliamentary democracy>introduced laws to make peasant lives better>kicked out the jews
>>217079094One of the penultimate Medieval Kings of all time, especially out of all English Kings
>>217081006>jews were allowed back 500 years later so tat's his fault
>>217079720interestingly after his death, edward the 2nd was murdered by his wife and lover with a red hot poker up the rectum. Edward the 3rd was more like his grandfather, just sayin
