[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: sketch-1574849444192.png (1.74 MB, 1440x1440)
1.74 MB
1.74 MB PNG
I miss when this was just a good movie
It didn't need a sequel
>>
lol the raped
>>
>>217105358
No art only profit
>>
You can easily pretend that Joker 2 doesn't exist. It made no impact whatsoever. I only ever see this board mention its existence.
>>
>>217105358
If Todd Phillips is the joker, the previous versions of heist masterminds are still canon + fleck is a Trojan horse to fleece DCU + shit on audiences. Philips is ahead of the curve by 2 big paychecks, but reviled just like the joker by normal civilians who had been robbed of time + money
>>
Treating Hollywood movie jobs as a cynical grift is why no tears are shed when they go in the dustbin of history
>>
>>217105405
If I pull that off, will you die?
It would be extremely painful.
You're a big guy!
For you!
>>
>>217105431
You can't discuss Joker 1 without people talking about how bad the sequel was
>>
>>217105358
They were both shit.
>>
>>217105358
the sequel was a legitimately good, creative arthouse film
the first was just a 7/10 taxi driver ripoff using intellectual property
>>
>>217105607
End your life.
>>
>>217105770
Get your rags off.
>>
>>217105770
No, I’m busy creating one
>>
>>217105431
the clown cannot be unraped.

It was...Irreversible.
>>
>>217105845
You are not. End your life.
>>217105807
End your life.
>>
>>217105358
The sequel was better and Kojima-approved.
>>
>>217105358
That garbage was not a good movie, it was not even a movie. It was an ad
Kill yourself Jew
>>
>>217105358
Explain to me how /tv/ latched on to this Arthur Fleck character as "literally me"' when there is NOTHING in common with the average /tv/ user and this guy besides being a man and being lonely and having some mental afflictions. He had no real politics or thoughts about the world and was a total beta pushover and never one with right wing views or some balls. I can't relate to this feminized Jew who worships Hollywood and got fucked like Kevin Nash in the Summer of 1992.
>>
>>217105470
>makes a movie about cycles of violence
>he was le shitting on audiences!!1
Sometimes the director just wants to tell a story.
>>
>>217105935
An ad for what?
>>
>>217105913
Jackie, aren't you going to buy me a drink first?
>>
>>217105956
you answered your own question. there was nothing but surface level self insertion but no one actually liked this character or cared about him. they just projected their own selves onto him and his epic joker persona. it did not matter that they weren't actually similar to him in any way.
>>
>>217105358
it still is a great movie. Dont let the people who intentionally made a meta self aware sequel that was designed to ruin the first movie win. Its no different than Caddyshack 2 to Caddyshack 1 or Alien 3 to Aliens. You simply ignore the follow up inferior sequels and only count the good ones as canon.
>>
I need to cum inside Lady Gaga.
>>
>>217106342
>it still is a great movie
No, it was always SHIT and was never a movie
>sequel that was designed to ruin the first movie win.
What the fuck are you talking about? They are exactly the same.
>>
>>217105431
This. I've never seen it and would forgotten it exists if it wasn't for the spam here
>>
>>217105405
lol the clownfucker
>>
>>217105358
Sequal is more original and better. A masterpiece. While first one is a movie you have seen many many times! Stereotypical. Immature snowflakes hate the sequel which is able to stand on its own.
>>
>>217105358
It's a cape movie
>>
I still havent seen the sequel so the joker is unraped as far as im concerned
>>
>>217105913
“No!”
>>
>>217105581
If I pull off those rags, joker, will your ass be bare?
It would be a fun rape
You're a famous antagonist
For you
>>
>>217105358
The sequel was made because the wrong kind of people liked the first one, so it had to be destroyed. Joker was "good" because it was accidentally made too open to interpretation.
>>
>>217105358
Then just ignore it? It's what I do for Gladiator 2 and Blade Runner 2.
>>
>aaaaah
>Hellpp uss
>we were raped too
>all of us were
>Nobody bought us any drinks!
>AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAA
>>
>>217107278
You can't just ignore it. Movies exist as a social experience and Joker 2 did its job of completely destroying the original social experience of Joker.
>>
>>217107316
Get a life
>>
>>217105607
You simply lack the intelligence to understand film
>>
>>217105956
>explain to me how he's relatable without mentioning these very relatable things.

>>217106025
you might actually be on the spectrum or have a touch of sociopathy.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.