>We've made a few... changes!
Would modern day Simpsons even trysomething this risqué? It's mild by today's standards but there's cleavage.
>>217166855You're not wrong. They wouldn't sexualize women, for a start. The man would be scrutinized further as well.
Christian fundamentalists (fundies) got very offended by this gag.
>>217166882I guess
I love it
>>217166818I dont get it
>>217167037It wasn't even about them
>>217166855That's modern day Simpsons too
>>217167037Don't they hate catholicism
>>217168926how very jewish of them
>>217166882It's making fun of oversexualized Super Bowl ads though. But still, you're not wrong. These days they wouldn't even do parody sexism to make fun of real sexism.
>>217166855>>217166882They wouldn't even do this in the early Simpsons. This show gets horny out of no where around S10.OP's one is from S10, too. Compare it to the outrage Marge had about the belly dancer from S2-3.
